D-I-TASSER Q6JVE6

D-I-TASSER results for Q6JVE6

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q6JVE6
Protein Name: Epididymal-specific lipocalin-10
Gene Name: LCN10

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q6JVE6 (187 residues)
MRQGLLVLALVLVLVLVLAAGSQVQEWYPRESHALNWNKFSGFWYILATATDAQGFLPAR
DKRKLGASVVKVNKVGQLRVLLAFRRGQGCGRAQPRHPGTSGHLWASLSVKGVKAFHVLS
TDYSYGLVYLRLGRATQNYKNLLLFHRQNVSSFQSLKEFMDACDILGLSKAAVILPKDAS
RTHTILP

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q6JVE6-D1	1-187	187		MRQGLLVLALVLVLVLVLAAGSQVQEWYPRESHALNWNKFSGFWYILATATDAQGFLPARDKRKLGASVVKVNKVGQLRVLLAFRRGQGCGRAQPRHPGTSGHLWASLSVKGVKAFHVLSTDYSYGLVYLRLGRATQNYKNLLLFHRQNVSSFQSLKEFMDACDILGLSKAAVILPKDASRTHTILP

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.7146

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	2l5pA	0.78	2.34	0.168	0.877	model1_2l5pA.pdb.gz
2	3qkgA	0.77	1.84	0.133	0.845	model1_3qkgA.pdb.gz
3	2qosC	0.77	2.00	0.156	0.845	model1_2qosC.pdb.gz
4	1epbB	0.75	2.14	0.197	0.840	model1_1epbB.pdb.gz
5	1gm6A	0.74	2.36	0.154	0.829	model1_1gm6A.pdb.gz
6	3zq3A	0.73	2.62	0.165	0.834	model1_3zq3A.pdb.gz
7	1ew3A	0.73	2.59	0.159	0.834	model1_1ew3A.pdb.gz
8	2xstA	0.72	1.79	0.230	0.791	model1_2xstA.pdb.gz
9	1df3A	0.72	2.65	0.174	0.829	model1_1df3A.pdb.gz
10	2hzqA	0.71	2.38	0.123	0.813	model1_2hzqA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0043167	0.73	ion binding
GO:0008289	0.71	lipid binding
GO:0046914	0.64	transition metal ion binding
GO:0005506	0.55	iron ion binding
GO:0036094	0.52	small molecule binding
GO:0005501	0.50	retinoid binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044699	0.95	single-organism process
GO:0050896	0.92	response to stimulus
GO:0009987	0.92	cellular process
GO:0044763	0.87	single-organism cellular process
GO:0065007	0.85	biological regulation
GO:0006950	0.84	response to stress
GO:0008152	0.79	metabolic process
GO:0006952	0.78	defense response
GO:0044710	0.75	single-organism metabolic process
GO:0050789	0.74	regulation of biological process
GO:0065008	0.73	regulation of biological quality
GO:0042592	0.72	homeostatic process
GO:0048878	0.71	chemical homeostasis
GO:0042221	0.71	response to chemical
GO:0002376	0.71	immune system process
GO:0044767	0.70	single-organism developmental process
GO:0071704	0.69	organic substance metabolic process
GO:0044237	0.69	cellular metabolic process
GO:0006810	0.69	transport
GO:0045087	0.68	innate immune response
GO:0044238	0.68	primary metabolic process
GO:0050794	0.67	regulation of cellular process
GO:0051716	0.66	cellular response to stimulus
GO:0048523	0.64	negative regulation of cellular process
GO:0044765	0.64	single-organism transport
GO:0032501	0.63	multicellular organismal process
GO:0006629	0.63	lipid metabolic process
GO:0010033	0.59	response to organic substance
GO:0051239	0.57	regulation of multicellular organismal process
GO:0070887	0.56	cellular response to chemical stimulus
GO:0033993	0.56	response to lipid
GO:0048518	0.55	positive regulation of biological process
GO:0015891	0.55	siderophore transport
GO:0006879	0.55	cellular iron ion homeostasis
GO:1901700	0.54	response to oxygen-containing compound
GO:0071310	0.54	cellular response to organic substance
GO:0048522	0.54	positive regulation of cellular process
GO:0071396	0.53	cellular response to lipid
GO:0048513	0.53	animal organ development
GO:0044255	0.52	cellular lipid metabolic process
GO:0042493	0.51	response to drug

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0005576	1.00	extracellular region
GO:0044421	0.95	extracellular region part
GO:0005615	0.94	extracellular space
GO:0044464	0.84	cell part
GO:0043227	0.79	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0044424	0.78	intracellular part
GO:0044444	0.68	cytoplasmic part
GO:0043231	0.65	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1ui7A	0.450	4.55	0.062	0.684	1.4.3.21	140,162,168
2	0.060	3gm8A	0.427	5.32	0.046	0.733	3.2.1.-	40
3	0.060	1e9iD	0.421	5.41	0.076	0.733	4.2.1.11	NA
4	0.060	2x4mA	0.441	4.91	0.021	0.679	3.4.23.48	98
5	0.060	3hi7A	0.449	4.55	0.062	0.684	1.4.3.22	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.08	1epbA	0.726	2.45	0.194	0.829	1.06	REA	complex1.pdb.gz	37,40,44,68,70,80,114,116,118,126,128,130,143,145
2	0.04	1epa0	0.727	2.43	0.194	0.829	1.06	III	complex2.pdb.gz	149,152,154,156,157,160,170,171
3	0.04	2qosC	0.767	2.00	0.156	0.845	0.86	III	complex3.pdb.gz	46,55,56,82,84,91,93,94,114,130,141,143,176
4	0.03	1gkaA	0.682	3.23	0.138	0.845	0.74	AXT	complex4.pdb.gz	100,103,107,113,114,115,116

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.