D-I-TASSER Q63HK3-D6

D-I-TASSER results for Q63HK3-D6

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q63HK3 (35 residues)
GEKPYRCGECGKCFSQSSSLIIHQRTHTGEKPYQC

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 \| GEKPYRCGECGKCFSQSSSLIIHQRTHTGEKPYQC
Prediction	CCCCCSCCCCCCSSCCCCCCHHHHCCCCCCCCCCC
Confidence	99984168888653232331110001168898589
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 \| GEKPYRCGECGKCFSQSSSLIIHQRTHTGEKPYQC
Prediction	87444517613431344241441323234544478
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20

                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCSCCCCCCSSCCCCCCHHHHCCCCCCCCCCC
GEKPYRCGECGKCFSQSSSLIIHQRTHTGEKPYQC

6j0dA

0.19

0.17

5.54

1.17

DEthreader

---KVFCYYCDREFDDEKILVQHQKAKFKKLSTFG

1x6eA2

0.62

0.60

17.17

3.44

SPARKS-K

GEKPYKCLECGKAFSQNSGLINHQRIHTSGPSSG-

2ep0A

0.60

17.20

1.86

MUSTER

GEKPYKCDVCHKSFRYGSSLTVHQRIHTGEKPSGP

2i13A

0.71

20.29

2.27

CNFpred

GEKPYKCPECGKSFSREDNLHTHQRTHTGEKPYKC

5hzdA

0.21

0.20

6.37

1.17

DEthreader

-VRLYSCDACPAVFTTHAALLAHAEEHADLPHTLV

5v3gD2

0.70

0.66

18.69

3.33

SPARKS-K

--KPYVCRECGRGFSWQSVLLRHQRTHTGEKPYVC

1tf6D1

0.42

0.37

10.91

0.55

MapAlign

-YKRYICSFCGAAYNKNWKLQAHLCKHTGEKP---

1tf6D

0.40

11.80

0.34

CEthreader

VYKRYICSFCGAAYNKNWKLQAHLCKHTGEKPFPC

2i13A

0.71

20.29

1.86

MUSTER

GEKPYKCPECGKSFSREDNLHTHQRTHTGEKPYKC

5v3jE

0.54

15.66

0.82

HHsearch

GDRPHKCKECGKAFIRRSELTHHERSHSGEKPYEC

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.4479

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	2i13A	0.77	1.61	0.657	0.971	model1_2i13A.pdb.gz
2	1a1fA	0.77	1.97	0.486	1.000	model1_1a1fA.pdb.gz
3	5t0uA	0.76	1.83	0.400	1.000	model1_5t0uA.pdb.gz
4	5egbA1	0.75	0.80	0.667	0.857	model1_5egbA1.pdb.gz
5	1llmC	0.75	1.95	0.500	0.971	model1_1llmC.pdb.gz
6	4gznC	0.75	1.91	0.371	0.971	model1_4gznC.pdb.gz
7	2kmkA	0.74	1.93	0.486	1.000	model1_2kmkA.pdb.gz
8	6ml2A2	0.73	0.81	0.367	0.829	model1_6ml2A2.pdb.gz
9	2jpaA	0.73	1.86	0.514	0.971	model1_2jpaA.pdb.gz
10	5v3gD	0.73	2.06	0.571	0.971	model1_5v3gD.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0003700	0.84	transcription factor activity, sequence-specific DNA binding
GO:1901363	0.65	heterocyclic compound binding
GO:0097159	0.65	organic cyclic compound binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0065007	0.98	biological regulation
GO:0050789	0.98	regulation of biological process
GO:0050794	0.97	regulation of cellular process
GO:0080090	0.93	regulation of primary metabolic process
GO:0031323	0.93	regulation of cellular metabolic process
GO:0010468	0.93	regulation of gene expression
GO:0006355	0.92	regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
GO:0009987	0.55	cellular process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	1.00	intracellular part
GO:0043226	0.98	organelle
GO:0043231	0.97	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0005634	0.96	nucleus

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1bwnA	0.607	1.25	0.057	0.829	2.7.10.2	NA
2	0.060	2ou2A	0.597	1.63	0.171	0.800	2.3.1.48	30
3	0.060	1tkyA	0.415	2.23	0.000	0.629	6.1.1.3	NA
4	0.060	1fx4A	0.583	2.45	0.000	0.914	4.6.1.1	NA
5	0.060	1v8cA	0.564	1.93	0.000	0.800	4.2.3.1	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.46	1meyF	0.711	2.23	0.743	1.000	0.76	UUU	complex1.pdb.gz	5,17,18
2	0.30	1f2iG	0.722	2.05	0.429	1.000	0.87	QNA	complex2.pdb.gz	3,14,16,19,22,23,26,31
3	0.08	1llmC	0.750	1.95	0.500	0.971	0.87	QNA	complex3.pdb.gz	12,14,15,16,19,23,26
4	0.08	2wbuA	0.761	1.54	0.486	0.971	0.82	QNA	complex4.pdb.gz	5,16,18,22
5	0.07	1f2i0	0.722	2.05	0.429	1.000	0.77	III	complex5.pdb.gz	4,5,8,15,16,20,21,24,28,30

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.