D-I-TASSER Q5VVS0-D1

D-I-TASSER results for Q5VVS0-D1

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q5VVS0 (124 residues)
MTQNSSSLGDRIITPYTPPRSQPMNKHLFVSLSTLFQTTELDFANKKSCFLCLPLRADGF
PEMPHSPAQTERMQKLAKDPPHARSEDVPDHLFFVDTAGLREIVCFCGVLSLRTSEGLMR
KETA

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 \| \| \| \| \| \| MTQNSSSLGDRIITPYTPPRSQPMNKHLFVSLSTLFQTTELDFANKKSCFLCLPLRADGFPEMPHSPAQTERMQKLAKDPPHARSEDVPDHLFFVDTAGLREIVCFCGVLSLRTSEGLMRKETA
Prediction	CCCCCCCCCCSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSCCCCSSSSSSSSSSSSSCCCCHHHCCCC
Confidence	9766666677255337999887554210100767552034433567633686432257887789983667899998608975445689982688724553345544445554414341220269
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 \| \| \| \| \| \| MTQNSSSLGDRIITPYTPPRSQPMNKHLFVSLSTLFQTTELDFANKKSCFLCLPLRADGFPEMPHSPAQTERMQKLAKDPPHARSEDVPDHLFFVDTAGLREIVCFCGVLSLRTSEGLMRKETA
Prediction	7455455324310322334565424430122023114344252344430100011336424624544453741552374345345762342011022331330011011121435533345668
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCCCCCCSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSCCCCSSSSSSSSSSSSSCCCCHHHCCCC
MTQNSSSLGDRIITPYTPPRSQPMNKHLFVSLSTLFQTTELDFANKKSCFLCLPLRADGFPEMPHSPAQTERMQKLAKDPPHARSEDVPDHLFFVDTAGLREIVCFCGVLSLRTSEGLMRKETA

6hzkA2

0.09

0.06

2.50

0.57

CEthreader

--------------------------VIRVMPTQL----IPNDTERKVLRVQLIQREGRDGFEPAYLFDEGSTIQWTPCGRKLTCSYPGIRLAYGPDGHEVSVLEVDGQFENLEEMIYVEGHLS

5fswA1

0.10

3.60

0.58

EigenThreader

SLTQLDVFRGKSFPERPSSKTGPLFLLDMKPLRFDEGCRLTRRFGPDRFLEVLVPS--PTALNAPSILKDGGVIRWLTEKPHSLVGRQWQAFYTKDKATFKERVHFFAERGHDFRPAPLRRTEI

5aj1A

0.12

0.08

2.85

0.31

FFAS-3D

MMALSKTFGQK-------PVKEDDGEFYMIGVGNYLRMFRGSLYKR-------------YPSLWRRLATVEERKKIVANTKDHGYTTLATSVTLLKASEVEEIL--------------------

6tj0A1

0.19

0.16

5.19

0.54

SPARKS-K

-----RSDEKRILSNVAVAPPLSEHWQLFNNNEVLFNEAR----TAQAATVVFSLQ------------QNAQIEPLARSIHTLRRQRGSAKILVRENASLRRLLLACGANVIPWNAPLSRCLTI

3lifA

0.11

0.06

2.31

0.56

CNFpred

-----------ITGPIQSRTSGVWVFVVSRRLETTD--------GKFFGVVVATIES---------EYFSTFYKTFDLGP--------GGSISLLHSD-GRLLIQWP-----------------

1e6vB

0.10

0.08

2.99

0.83

DEthreader

IDITVAVDNVASML------VGYALRNIMHIVAATRK---NT----MQAVCLAAQQAMDHGYQGVAGLVAAVMQGVSASFSHGGGGPG----IFHGTRHSGAIVAMADAGSPEVTS-LI-----

2pffB

0.03

1.84

0.79

MapAlign

GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG-GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGTIVDGKLKTEKI---

5h64A

0.15

4.90

0.45

MUSTER

LVRISSMEGERLREEMEEITQQQLVHDKYCKDLMGFGTKPRHITPFTSFQAVQPQQSNALVGLLGYSSHQGLMGFGTSPSPAKSTLVESRCCRDLMEEKFDQ-VCQW-VLKCRNSNSLIQMTIL

2pffB

0.19

5.98

0.53

HHsearch

MLSISNLTQEVQKTNSHLPAGKQVEISLVNGAKNLVRKAKIPFSERKLKFSNRFLPVSPFHSHLLVPASDLINKDLVKNSFNAKDIQIPV----YDTFDGSDLRVLSGSISERIVDCIIRLPVK

6fhtA3

0.11

0.10

3.75

0.52

CEthreader

--FRQSLREHHARVALAAAHSLSPHDTLSDPALDLLGLMR--------AGGLILRFEGRWQTLPPAPAVDALLAWLETQPGALPAPSAAGLLAISVGEGWSECLVWLRPELRLEKRGYAEPWHP

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.546

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	2sliA	0.49	4.25	0.039	0.815	model1_2sliA.pdb.gz
2	2vk7A	0.49	4.17	0.038	0.815	model1_2vk7A.pdb.gz
3	3qdeA	0.48	4.43	0.034	0.823	model1_3qdeA.pdb.gz
4	2cqtA	0.47	4.84	0.051	0.863	model1_2cqtA.pdb.gz
5	1kitA3	0.41	3.67	0.038	0.629	model1_1kitA3.pdb.gz
6	1v7vA	0.40	4.85	0.044	0.750	model1_1v7vA.pdb.gz
7	1wueA2	0.39	4.48	0.047	0.645	model1_1wueA2.pdb.gz
8	2agsA1	0.39	4.13	0.034	0.621	model1_2agsA1.pdb.gz
9	2w5nA	0.38	4.18	0.089	0.629	model1_2w5nA.pdb.gz
10	2jkbA1	0.37	5.12	0.019	0.694	model1_2jkbA1.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0016997	0.56	alpha-sialidase activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044238	0.31	primary metabolic process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0016020	0.80	membrane
GO:0043231	0.60	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0005737	0.60	cytoplasm
GO:0005576	0.60	extracellular region

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1nyqB	0.443	4.52	0.017	0.806	6.1.1.3	113
2	0.060	1sliA	0.486	4.08	0.065	0.806	4.2.2.15 3.2.1.18	NA
3	0.060	1sllA	0.492	3.94	0.066	0.790	4.2.2.15	NA
4	0.060	1y4wA	0.445	4.61	0.086	0.798	3.2.1.80	71
5	0.060	1wopA	0.442	5.00	0.089	0.831	2.1.2.10	56

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.01	1kmnA	0.443	4.57	0.059	0.831	0.12	ATP	complex1.pdb.gz	11,13,15
2	0.01	1pj7A	0.453	4.74	0.035	0.806	0.11	FFO	complex2.pdb.gz	34,106,108
3	0.01	3mf1A	0.453	4.47	0.060	0.815	0.14	G5A	complex3.pdb.gz	13,99,101,103
4	0.01	3mf2B	0.455	4.50	0.060	0.815	0.14	AMP	complex4.pdb.gz	11,39,106,107,108,109
5	0.01	3meyA	0.455	4.50	0.060	0.815	0.14	ATP	complex5.pdb.gz	42,109,111
6	0.01	1b76B	0.450	4.78	0.066	0.831	0.18	ATP	complex6.pdb.gz	43,107,108,109,121
7	0.01	1httD	0.440	4.77	0.050	0.839	0.11	UUU	complex7.pdb.gz	3,10,11,12,57,59,60
8	0.01	2el9A	0.438	4.48	0.034	0.806	0.12	HSS	complex8.pdb.gz	37,101,104,108
9	0.01	1ggmB	0.449	4.84	0.065	0.839	0.11	GAP	complex9.pdb.gz	16,43,109,111,112,113
10	0.01	3meyB	0.447	4.55	0.043	0.806	0.19	ATP	complex10.pdb.gz	51,82,84,92,105

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.