D-I-TASSER Q5T2S8

D-I-TASSER results for Q5T2S8

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q5T2S8
Protein Name: Armadillo repeat-containing protein 4
Gene Name: ARMC4

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q5T2S8 (1044 residues)
MGVALRKLTQWTAAGHGTGILEITPLNEAILKEIIVFVESFIYKHPQEAKFVFVEPLEWN
TSLAPSAFESGYVVSETTVKSEEVDKNGQPLLFLSVPQIKIRSFGQLSRLLLIAKTGKLK
EAQACVEANRDPIVKILGSDYNTMKENSIALNILGKITRDDDPESEIKMKIAMLLKQLDL
HLLNHSLKHISLEISLSPMTVKKDIELLKRFSGKGNQTVLESIEYTSDYEFSNGCRAPPW
RQIRGEICYVLVKPHDGETLCITCSAGGVFLNGGKTDDEGDVNYERKGSIYKNLVTFLRE
KSPKFSENMSKLGISFSEDQQKEKDQLGKAPKKEEAAALRKDISGSDKRSLEKNQINFWR
NQMTKRWEPSLNWKTTVNYKGKGSAKEIQEDKHTGKLEKPRPSVSHGRAQLLRKSAEKIE
ETVSDSSSESEEDEEPPDHRQEASADLPSEYWQIQKLVKYLKGGNQTATVIALCSMRDFS
LAQETCQLAIRDVGGLEVLINLLETDEVKCKIGSLKILKEISHNPQIRQNIVDLGGLPIM
VNILDSPHKSLKCLAAETIANVAKFKRARRVVRQHGGITKLVALLDCAHDSTKPAQSSLY
EARDVEVARCGALALWSCSKSHTNKEAIRKAGGIPLLARLLKTSHENMLIPVVGTLQECA
SEENYRAAIKAERIIENLVKNLNSENEQLQEHCAMAIYQCAEDKETRDLVRLHGGLKPLA
SLLNNTDNKERLAAVTGAIWKCSISKENVTKFREYKAIETLVGLLTDQPEEVLVNVVGAL
GECCQERENRVIVRKCGGIQPLVNLLVGINQALLVNVTKAVGACAVEPESMMIIDRLDGV
RLLWSLLKNPHPDVKASAAWALCPCIKNAKDAGEMVRSFVGGLELIVNLLKSDNKEVLAS
VCAAITNIAKDQENLAVITDHGVVPLLSKLANTNNNKLRHHLAEAISRCCMWGRNRVAFG
EHKAVAPLVRYLKSNDTNVHRATAQALYQLSEDADNCITMHENGAVKLLLDMVGSPDQDL
QEAAAGCISNIRRLALATEKARYT

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q5T2S8-D1	1-952	952		MGVALRKLTQWTAAGHGTGILEITPLNEAILKEIIVFVESFIYKHPQEAKFVFVEPLEWNTSLAPSAFESGYVVSETTVKSEEVDKNGQPLLFLSVPQIKIRSFGQLSRLLLIAKTGKLKEAQACVEANRDPIVKILGSDYNTMKENSIALNILGKITRDDDPESEIKMKIAMLLKQLDLHLLNHSLKHISLEISLSPMTVKKDIELLKRFSGKGNQTVLESIEYTSDYEFSNGCRAPPWRQIRGEICYVLVKPHDGETLCITCSAGGVFLNGGKTDDEGDVNYERKGSIYKNLVTFLREKSPKFSENMSKLGISFSEDQQKEKDQLGKAPKKEEAAALRKDISGSDKRSLEKNQINFWRNQMTKRWEPSLNWKTTVNYKGKGSAKEIQEDKHTGKLEKPRPSVSHGRAQLLRKSAEKIEETVSDSSSESEEDEEPPDHRQEASADLPSEYWQIQKLVKYLKGGNQTATVIALCSMRDFSLAQETCQLAIRDVGGLEVLINLLETDEVKCKIGSLKILKEISHNPQIRQNIVDLGGLPIMVNILDSPHKSLKCLAAETIANVAKFKRARRVVRQHGGITKLVALLDCAHDSTKPAQSSLYEARDVEVARCGALALWSCSKSHTNKEAIRKAGGIPLLARLLKTSHENMLIPVVGTLQECASEENYRAAIKAERIIENLVKNLNSENEQLQEHCAMAIYQCAEDKETRDLVRLHGGLKPLASLLNNTDNKERLAAVTGAIWKCSISKENVTKFREYKAIETLVGLLTDQPEEVLVNVVGALGECCQERENRVIVRKCGGIQPLVNLLVGINQALLVNVTKAVGACAVEPESMMIIDRLDGVRLLWSLLKNPHPDVKASAAWALCPCIKNAKDAGEMVRSFVGGLELIVNLLKSDNKEVLASVCAAITNIAKDQENLAVITDHGVVPLLSKLANTNNNKLRHHLAEAISRCCMW
2	Q5T2S8-D2	953-1044	92		GRNRVAFGEHKAVAPLVRYLKSNDTNVHRATAQALYQLSEDADNCITMHENGAVKLLLDMVGSPDQDLQEAAAGCISNIRRLALATEKARYT

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.75

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	4i2wA	0.77	2.12	0.118	0.802	model1_4i2wA.pdb.gz
2	3nowA	0.64	3.21	0.124	0.693	model1_3nowA.pdb.gz
3	6mu1A	0.51	7.32	0.058	0.703	model1_6mu1A.pdb.gz
4	5yz0A	0.45	7.55	0.042	0.614	model1_5yz0A.pdb.gz
5	6yejA	0.44	7.98	0.052	0.632	model1_6yejA.pdb.gz
6	2z6gA	0.43	3.67	0.172	0.470	model1_2z6gA.pdb.gz
7	4kf7A	0.42	7.69	0.075	0.589	model1_4kf7A.pdb.gz
8	5ijoJ	0.42	6.97	0.053	0.549	model1_5ijoJ.pdb.gz
9	5hb4B	0.42	6.98	0.072	0.547	model1_5hb4B.pdb.gz
10	5oqrA	0.42	6.73	0.075	0.548	model1_5oqrA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0022892	0.49	substrate-specific transporter activity
GO:0008565	0.48	protein transporter activity
GO:0008139	0.48	nuclear localization sequence binding
GO:0097159	0.47	organic cyclic compound binding
GO:1901363	0.46	heterocyclic compound binding
GO:0019899	0.42	enzyme binding
GO:0036094	0.39	small molecule binding
GO:0032555	0.38	purine ribonucleotide binding
GO:0032550	0.38	purine ribonucleoside binding
GO:0035639	0.35	purine ribonucleoside triphosphate binding
GO:0003824	0.33	catalytic activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044699	0.97	single-organism process
GO:0009987	0.71	cellular process
GO:0044763	0.58	single-organism cellular process
GO:0051179	0.55	localization
GO:0065007	0.52	biological regulation
GO:0051234	0.50	establishment of localization
GO:0050789	0.50	regulation of biological process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	1.00	intracellular part
GO:0043226	0.93	organelle
GO:0043231	0.92	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0005634	0.91	nucleus
GO:0005737	0.89	cytoplasm

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	2a4zA	0.285	8.14	0.034	0.414	2.7.1.153	456,534,562
2	0.060	2dqmA	0.323	8.68	0.061	0.493	3.4.11.2	NA
3	0.060	2vdcA	0.310	9.00	0.042	0.477	1.4.1.13	NA
4	0.060	2vz8A	0.288	9.70	0.047	0.478	2.3.1.85	NA
5	0.060	2rd0A	0.294	8.51	0.043	0.440	2.7.1.153	536,538

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.02	1jpwB	0.420	3.47	0.183	0.459	0.69	III	complex1.pdb.gz	470,471,474,477,478,513,516
2	0.02	1ee4A	0.332	2.57	0.173	0.350	0.65	III	complex2.pdb.gz	513,516,520,523,557,561
3	0.01	1f59A	0.259	6.17	0.083	0.328	0.70	III	complex3.pdb.gz	493,496,497,500,501,535,536
4	0.01	1o6pA	0.262	6.10	0.080	0.331	0.61	III	complex4.pdb.gz	493,496,497,534,535

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.