D-I-TASSER Q5JQF8-D1

D-I-TASSER results for Q5JQF8-D1

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q5JQF8 (78 residues)
MASLYVGDLHPEVTEAMLYEKFSPAGPILSIRICRDKITRRSLGYAYVNYQQPVDAKRAL
ETLNFDVIKGRPVRIMWS

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 \| \| \| MASLYVGDLHPEVTEAMLYEKFSPAGPILSIRICRDKITRRSLGYAYVNYQQPVDAKRALETLNFDVIKGRPVRIMWS
Prediction	CCSSSSCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHCCCCSSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCSSCCSSSSSSCC
Confidence	978997799998899999999872497679998863899983503899849999999999985993889976797469
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 \| \| \| MASLYVGDLHPEVTEAMLYEKFSPAGPILSIRICRDKITRRSLGYAYVNYQQPVDAKRALETLNFDVIKGRPVRIMWS
Prediction	723010140447243730461146225145040131473643401020316367205401761454405424031448
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60

                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCSSSSCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHCCCCSSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCSSCCSSSSSSCC
MASLYVGDLHPEVTEAMLYEKFSPAGPILSIRICRDKITRRSLGYAYVNYQQPVDAKRALETLNFDVIKGRPVRIMWS

3cw18

0.27

8.26

1.50

DEthreader

-KTLFVARVNYDTTESKLRREFEVYGPIKRIHMVYSKRSGKPRGYAFIEYEHERDMHSAYKHADGKKIDGRRVLVDVR

1cvjA1

0.88

0.87

24.53

2.09

SPARKS-K

-ASLYVGDLHPDVTEAMLYEKFSPAGPILSIRVCRDMITRRSLGYAYVNFQQPADAERALDTMNFDVIKGKPVRIMWS

5uz5A

0.31

9.31

0.47

MapAlign

YRTIFIGRLPYDLDEIELQKYFVKFGEIEKIRIVKDKITQKSKGYAFIVFKDPISSKMAFKEIGGIQIKDRICIVDIE

5uz5A

0.31

9.31

0.30

CEthreader

YRTIFIGRLPYDLDEIELQKYFVKFGEIEKIRIVKDKITQKSKGYAFIVFKDPISSKMAFKEIGGIQIKDRICIVDIE

1cvjA1

0.88

0.87

24.53

2.08

MUSTER

-ASLYVGDLHPDVTEAMLYEKFSPAGPILSIRVCRDMITRRSLGYAYVNFQQPADAERALDTMNFDVIKGKPVRIMWS

5uz5A

0.31

9.31

0.83

HHsearch

YRTIFIGRLPYDLDEIELQKYFVKFGEIEKIRIVKDKITQKSKGYAFIVFKDPISSKMAFKEIRGIQIKDRICIVDIE

1cvjA1

0.88

0.87

24.53

1.85

FFAS-3D

-ASLYVGDLHPDVTEAMLYEKFSPAGPILSIRVCRDMITRRSLGYAYVNFQQPADAERALDTMNFDVIKGKPVRIMWS

2myfA

0.31

9.31

0.55

EigenThreader

TDILFVGGIDETIDEKSLYDIFSSFGDIRNIEVPLNMTTKKNRGFAFVEYVEVDDAKHALYNMNNFELNGKRIHVNYS

6d0yA

0.33

10.00

1.73

CNFpred

SCTLYVGNLSFYTTEEQIYELFSKSGDIKKIIMGLDKMKKTACGFCFVEYYSRADAENAMRYINGTRLDDRIIRTDWD

1b7fA

0.32

9.65

1.50

DEthreader

NTNLIVNYLPQDMTDRELYALFRAIGPINTCRIMRDYKTGYSYGYAFVDFTSEMDSQRAIKVLNGITVRNKRLKVSYA

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.9417

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	1cvjA1	0.95	0.66	0.883	0.987	model1_1cvjA1.pdb.gz
2	1b7fA1	0.95	0.88	0.321	1.000	model1_1b7fA1.pdb.gz
3	2qfjB2	0.94	0.78	0.218	1.000	model1_2qfjB2.pdb.gz
4	3cw18	0.94	0.73	0.269	0.987	model1_3cw18.pdb.gz
5	6n7pF	0.94	0.81	0.295	1.000	model1_6n7pF.pdb.gz
6	5gm6V	0.94	0.87	0.321	1.000	model1_5gm6V.pdb.gz
7	4pkdB2	0.93	0.90	0.269	1.000	model1_4pkdB2.pdb.gz
8	5mmjv	0.93	0.92	0.269	1.000	model1_5mmjv.pdb.gz
9	4a8xA	0.93	1.01	0.282	1.000	model1_4a8xA.pdb.gz
10	2cq0A	0.93	0.91	0.282	1.000	model1_2cq0A.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:1901363	0.98	heterocyclic compound binding
GO:0097159	0.98	organic cyclic compound binding
GO:0003676	0.94	nucleic acid binding
GO:0003723	0.93	RNA binding
GO:0044822	0.59	poly(A) RNA binding
GO:0036094	0.56	small molecule binding
GO:0000166	0.55	nucleotide binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0009987	0.94	cellular process
GO:0044237	0.82	cellular metabolic process
GO:0044238	0.80	primary metabolic process
GO:0043170	0.80	macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0044260	0.79	cellular macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0034641	0.78	cellular nitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:1901360	0.75	organic cyclic compound metabolic process
GO:0016070	0.74	RNA metabolic process
GO:0016071	0.66	mRNA metabolic process
GO:0065007	0.60	biological regulation
GO:0050789	0.60	regulation of biological process
GO:0006396	0.60	RNA processing
GO:0006397	0.55	mRNA processing
GO:0050794	0.54	regulation of cellular process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	1.00	intracellular part
GO:0032991	0.78	macromolecular complex
GO:0044446	0.73	intracellular organelle part
GO:0044428	0.68	nuclear part
GO:0043226	0.58	organelle
GO:0030529	0.57	intracellular ribonucleoprotein complex
GO:0043229	0.56	intracellular organelle
GO:0044444	0.51	cytoplasmic part

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.329	2cqbA	0.888	1.21	0.333	1.000	5.2.1.8	5,28,31,33,74
2	0.227	2e5gA	0.743	1.93	0.222	0.923	2.7.7.52	3
3	0.189	2dnrA	0.703	2.07	0.188	0.885	3.1.3.36	25,31,60
4	0.120	2ko1A	0.608	2.67	0.086	0.897	2.7.6.5	14,31,67
5	0.081	3cnqP	0.570	2.48	0.159	0.808	3.4.21.62	66

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.64	1cvjG	0.947	0.67	0.883	0.987	0.90	QNA	complex1.pdb.gz	5,15,32,33,35,36,37,40,43,45,47,49,74,76,77,78
2	0.12	2kg0A	0.805	1.66	0.197	0.974	1.19	RQA	complex2.pdb.gz	7,8,9,11,41,42,64,65,71,72,73,74,76
3	0.10	2i2yA	0.809	1.48	0.301	0.936	0.99	RQA	complex3.pdb.gz	5,32,34,35,36,45,47,76,77,78
4	0.08	1h2v1	0.937	0.92	0.333	1.000	1.38	III	complex4.pdb.gz	12,15,16,17,19,20,21,24,51,61,62,64,66,67,69,70
5	0.07	1p272	0.924	1.00	0.321	1.000	1.21	III	complex5.pdb.gz	3,5,30,32,34,37,38,43,44,45,49,76,77
6	0.06	2x1aA	0.922	1.04	0.244	1.000	1.26	QNA	complex6.pdb.gz	8,9,10,11,44,71
7	0.06	1urnB	0.858	1.67	0.253	0.949	1.04	RQA	complex7.pdb.gz	5,7,8,11,32,34,36,44,45,47,71,76,77,78
8	0.06	1pgzA	0.900	1.10	0.260	0.987	0.95	UUU	complex8.pdb.gz	3,5,7,8,30,32,34,43,44,45,47,71,74,76,77,78
9	0.06	2f9j0	0.863	1.59	0.280	0.949	0.85	III	complex9.pdb.gz	2,3,15,18,29,30,31,32,33,45,47,52,53
10	0.06	1a9n1	0.860	1.67	0.227	0.949	1.25	III	complex10.pdb.gz	16,17,19,20,21,23,24,26,27,30,66,67,68,69,70

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.