D-I-TASSER Q53H82

D-I-TASSER results for Q53H82

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q53H82
Protein Name: Endoribonuclease LACTB2
Gene Name: LACTB2

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q53H82 (288 residues)
MAAVLQRVERLSNRVVRVLGCNPGPMTLQGTNTYLVGTGPRRILIDTGEPAIPEYISCLK
QALTEFNTAIQEIVVTHWHRDHSGGIGDICKSINNDTTYCIKKLPRNPQREEIIGNGEQQ
YVYLKDGDVIKTEGATLRVLYTPGHTDDHMALLLEEENAIFSGDCILGEGTTVFEDLYDY
MNSLKELLKIKADIIYPGHGPVIHNAEAKIQQYISHRNIREQQILTLFRENFEKSFTVME
LVKIIYKNTPENLHEMAKHNLLLHLKKLEKEGKIFSNTDPDKKWKAHL

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q53H82-D1	1-204	204		MAAVLQRVERLSNRVVRVLGCNPGPMTLQGTNTYLVGTGPRRILIDTGEPAIPEYISCLKQALTEFNTAIQEIVVTHWHRDHSGGIGDICKSINNDTTYCIKKLPRNPQREEIIGNGEQQYVYLKDGDVIKTEGATLRVLYTPGHTDDHMALLLEEENAIFSGDCILGEGTTVFEDLYDYMNSLKELLKIKADIIYPGHGPVIH
2	Q53H82-D2	205-288	84		NAEAKIQQYISHRNIREQQILTLFRENFEKSFTVMELVKIIYKNTPENLHEMAKHNLLLHLKKLEKEGKIFSNTDPDKKWKAHL

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.88

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	4ad9A	0.99	0.48	1.000	1.000	model1_4ad9A.pdb.gz
2	5i0pA	0.81	3.04	0.207	0.941	model1_5i0pA.pdb.gz
3	2zo4A	0.74	3.57	0.239	0.892	model1_2zo4A.pdb.gz
4	6uxuA	0.74	3.39	0.132	0.878	model1_6uxuA.pdb.gz
5	2cg2A	0.73	3.55	0.121	0.882	model1_2cg2A.pdb.gz
6	2yheA1	0.73	3.68	0.143	0.885	model1_2yheA1.pdb.gz
7	4nurA1	0.73	3.57	0.132	0.882	model1_4nurA1.pdb.gz
8	6h0cA	0.72	3.71	0.096	0.875	model1_6h0cA.pdb.gz
9	6zk8A	0.72	3.66	0.179	0.878	model1_6zk8A.pdb.gz
10	2ohiA	0.72	3.63	0.174	0.872	model1_2ohiA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0003824	0.93	catalytic activity
GO:0046872	0.88	metal ion binding
GO:0016787	0.85	hydrolase activity
GO:0046914	0.80	transition metal ion binding
GO:1901363	0.78	heterocyclic compound binding
GO:0097159	0.78	organic cyclic compound binding
GO:0003676	0.77	nucleic acid binding
GO:0016788	0.74	hydrolase activity, acting on ester bonds
GO:0008270	0.73	zinc ion binding
GO:0004521	0.63	endoribonuclease activity
GO:0003727	0.63	single-stranded RNA binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0008152	0.99	metabolic process
GO:0009987	0.95	cellular process
GO:0044237	0.94	cellular metabolic process
GO:0071704	0.92	organic substance metabolic process
GO:1901360	0.85	organic cyclic compound metabolic process
GO:0034641	0.85	cellular nitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:0006725	0.84	cellular aromatic compound metabolic process
GO:0044238	0.82	primary metabolic process
GO:0043170	0.82	macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0046483	0.81	heterocycle metabolic process
GO:0044260	0.81	cellular macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0090304	0.80	nucleic acid metabolic process
GO:0016070	0.79	RNA metabolic process
GO:0009058	0.67	biosynthetic process
GO:1901576	0.63	organic substance biosynthetic process
GO:0044249	0.63	cellular biosynthetic process
GO:1901362	0.62	organic cyclic compound biosynthetic process
GO:0019438	0.62	aromatic compound biosynthetic process
GO:0044271	0.58	cellular nitrogen compound biosynthetic process
GO:0034645	0.58	cellular macromolecule biosynthetic process
GO:0006351	0.57	transcription, DNA-templated
GO:0090502	0.50	RNA phosphodiester bond hydrolysis, endonucleolytic

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	1.00	cell part
GO:0044424	0.99	intracellular part
GO:0044444	0.94	cytoplasmic part
GO:0043226	0.86	organelle
GO:0043227	0.85	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0043229	0.84	intracellular organelle
GO:0043231	0.83	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0044446	0.78	intracellular organelle part
GO:0005634	0.72	nucleus
GO:0005759	0.71	mitochondrial matrix

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.388	2ohhA	0.723	3.56	0.174	0.872	1.-.-.-	81
2	0.276	1ko2A	0.627	2.92	0.163	0.722	3.5.2.6	81
3	0.268	1znbB	0.642	2.92	0.172	0.740	3.5.2.6	78,84,199
4	0.153	1qh5A	0.593	2.86	0.156	0.684	3.1.2.6	143,174
5	0.153	2qedA	0.579	3.31	0.188	0.691	3.1.2.6	143,175

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.55	2zo4A	0.741	3.57	0.239	0.892	1.03	ZN	complex1.pdb.gz	81,82,164,199
2	0.48	1ychA	0.713	3.52	0.156	0.861	1.17	FEO	complex2.pdb.gz	77,79,81,82,145,164,199
3	0.24	1kr3B	0.641	2.82	0.168	0.733	0.98	113	complex3.pdb.gz	145,164,167,171,199
4	0.22	1znbA	0.643	2.95	0.174	0.740	0.93	NA	complex4.pdb.gz	31,32,46,47,81,82
5	0.22	3q6xA	0.627	3.29	0.194	0.733	0.89	ZZ7	complex5.pdb.gz	22,49,79,80,81,145,164,167,172,173,199
6	0.20	1a8tA	0.641	2.79	0.168	0.733	0.84	061	complex6.pdb.gz	31,145,164,168,199,200,201

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.