D-I-TASSER Q2WGJ6

D-I-TASSER results for Q2WGJ6

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q2WGJ6
Protein Name: Kelch-like protein 38
Gene Name: KLHL38

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q2WGJ6 (581 residues)
MDEESLDGLLFKDHDFSSDLLRQLNSLRQSRILTDVSICAGAREIPCHRNVLASSSPYFR
AMFCSSFREKSEAKVQLKGIDPPTLDQIVSYVYTGEAHIATDNVLPVMEAASMLQFPKLF
EACSSYLQSQLAPSNCLGMIRLSEILSCETLKKKAREVALTSFPEVAASADLKELCALEL
RDYLGDDGLCGEEEKVFEALMVWIKHDLQARKRYMQELFKQVRLQYIHPAFFHHFIANDA
LLQSSPACQIILETAKRQMFSLCGTTVPDCKLLLHVPPRNSYQDFLILLGGRKDSQQTTR
DVLLYSKQTGQWQSLAKLPTRLYKASAITLHRSIYVLGGMAVSSGRSLVSHNVYIFSLKL
NQWRLGEPMLVARYSHRSTAHKNFIFSIGGIGEGQELMGSMERYDSICNVWESMASMPVG
VLHPAVAVKDQRLYLFGGEDIMQNPVRLIQVYHISRNSWFKMETRMIKNVCAPAVVLGER
IVIVGGYTRRILAYDPQSNKFVKCADMKDRRMHHGATVMGNKLYVTGGRRLTTDCNIEDS
ASFDCYDPETDTWTSQGQLPHKLFDHACLTLQCIPRTSGLP

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q2WGJ6-D1	1-279	279		MDEESLDGLLFKDHDFSSDLLRQLNSLRQSRILTDVSICAGAREIPCHRNVLASSSPYFRAMFCSSFREKSEAKVQLKGIDPPTLDQIVSYVYTGEAHIATDNVLPVMEAASMLQFPKLFEACSSYLQSQLAPSNCLGMIRLSEILSCETLKKKAREVALTSFPEVAASADLKELCALELRDYLGDDGLCGEEEKVFEALMVWIKHDLQARKRYMQELFKQVRLQYIHPAFFHHFIANDALLQSSPACQIILETAKRQMFSLCGTTVPDCKLLLHVPPR
2	Q2WGJ6-D2	280-581	302		NSYQDFLILLGGRKDSQQTTRDVLLYSKQTGQWQSLAKLPTRLYKASAITLHRSIYVLGGMAVSSGRSLVSHNVYIFSLKLNQWRLGEPMLVARYSHRSTAHKNFIFSIGGIGEGQELMGSMERYDSICNVWESMASMPVGVLHPAVAVKDQRLYLFGGEDIMQNPVRLIQVYHISRNSWFKMETRMIKNVCAPAVVLGERIVIVGGYTRRILAYDPQSNKFVKCADMKDRRMHHGATVMGNKLYVTGGRRLTTDCNIEDSASFDCYDPETDTWTSQGQLPHKLFDHACLTLQCIPRTSGLP

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.65

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	4yy8A	0.51	3.24	0.146	0.558	model1_4yy8A.pdb.gz
2	2dyhA	0.50	0.69	0.247	0.501	model1_2dyhA.pdb.gz
3	6hrlA	0.48	1.03	0.230	0.485	model1_6hrlA.pdb.gz
4	2vpjA	0.48	0.95	0.246	0.484	model1_2vpjA.pdb.gz
5	2xn4A	0.48	0.89	0.240	0.480	model1_2xn4A.pdb.gz
6	2wozA	0.47	2.57	0.157	0.499	model1_2wozA.pdb.gz
7	5a10A	0.43	2.69	0.168	0.465	model1_5a10A.pdb.gz
8	2uvkB	0.43	2.12	0.158	0.451	model1_2uvkB.pdb.gz
9	2zwaB2	0.42	2.50	0.112	0.446	model1_2zwaB2.pdb.gz
10	2eidA	0.40	4.46	0.103	0.482	model1_2eidA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0003824	0.97	catalytic activity
GO:0004842	0.96	ubiquitin-protein transferase activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0009987	0.98	cellular process
GO:0008152	0.87	metabolic process
GO:0044260	0.86	cellular macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0044238	0.86	primary metabolic process
GO:0019538	0.83	protein metabolic process
GO:0032446	0.82	protein modification by small protein conjugation
GO:0016567	0.65	protein ubiquitination
GO:0065007	0.52	biological regulation
GO:0042787	0.52	protein ubiquitination involved in ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process
GO:0050789	0.50	regulation of biological process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	1.00	intracellular part
GO:0043234	0.96	protein complex
GO:0031461	0.95	cullin-RING ubiquitin ligase complex
GO:0031463	0.94	Cul3-RING ubiquitin ligase complex

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1jofA	0.384	3.89	0.049	0.449	5.5.1.5	NA
2	0.060	1v04A	0.388	3.67	0.071	0.446	3.1.1.2 3.1.8.1	514
3	0.060	1eusA	0.400	3.38	0.076	0.451	3.2.1.18	NA
4	0.060	1ri6A	0.395	3.62	0.086	0.458	3.1.1.31	377
5	0.060	1k3iA	0.387	4.58	0.078	0.468	1.1.3.9	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.01	2f10A	0.400	3.30	0.059	0.448	0.35	BCZ	complex1.pdb.gz	291,293,324,390,422,423,438
2	0.01	2vdcB	0.457	7.19	0.050	0.699	0.23	FMN	complex2.pdb.gz	289,290,291,299,338,526,527
3	0.01	1llwA	0.409	7.57	0.055	0.652	0.20	FMN	complex3.pdb.gz	289,290,291,317
4	0.01	1ea0B	0.367	8.30	0.037	0.630	0.13	FMN	complex4.pdb.gz	335,336,337,338,387
5	0.01	2vdcA	0.447	7.26	0.043	0.689	0.16	FMN	complex5.pdb.gz	335,515,527,528
6	0.01	1ofdA	0.409	7.50	0.038	0.654	0.15	FMN	complex6.pdb.gz	289,290,291,336,528
7	0.01	1f59A	0.269	7.16	0.043	0.418	0.28	III	complex7.pdb.gz	337,338,401
8	0.01	1ofdA	0.409	7.50	0.038	0.654	0.27	F3S	complex8.pdb.gz	369,370,371,389,391,392
9	0.01	1o6pA	0.263	7.73	0.070	0.434	0.22	III	complex9.pdb.gz	337,338,388
10	0.01	2zw9B	0.415	3.52	0.077	0.461	0.11	SAM	complex10.pdb.gz	389,390,397

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.