D-I-TASSER Q2VPA4-D4

D-I-TASSER results for Q2VPA4-D4

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q2VPA4 (64 residues)
KSCDDFLGQLPNGHVLFPLNLQLGAKVDFVCDEGFQLKGSSASYCVLAGMESLWNSSVPV
CERK

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 \| \| \| KSCDDFLGQLPNGHVLFPLNLQLGAKVDFVCDEGFQLKGSSASYCVLAGMESLWNSSVPVCERK
Prediction	CCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCSSSCCCCSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
Confidence	9889999899995798089850472999995799179279911999669857248999713229
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 \| \| \| KSCDDFLGQLPNGHVLFPLNLQLGAKVDFVCDEGFQLKGSSASYCVLAGMESLWNSSVPVCERK
Prediction	8665753662440414257514242404044354142434633303144764514764255568
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60

                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCSSSCCCCSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
KSCDDFLGQLPNGHVLFPLNLQLGAKVDFVCDEGFQLKGSSASYCVLAGMESLWNSSVPVCERK

1ojyC2

0.24

0.23

7.30

1.33

DEthreader

IYCPAPP-QIDNGIIQERDHYGYRQSVTYACNKGFTMIGEHSIYCTVNNDEGEWSGPPPECRG-

3o8eB3

0.29

0.28

8.56

2.40

SPARKS-K

-TCPYI-RDPLNGQAVPANTYEFGYQMHFICNEGYYLIGEEILYCELKGSVAIWSGKPPICEKV

2q7zA

0.30

9.02

0.68

MapAlign

RKSCGPPPEPFNGMVHINTDTQFGSTVNYSCNEGFRLIGSPSTTCLVSGNNVTWDKKAPICENG

1ojyC

0.32

0.31

9.42

0.48

CEthreader

KSCPNPGE-IRNGQIDVPGGILFGATISFSCNTGYKLFGSTSSFCLISGSSVQWSDPLPECREI

1ntjA2

0.74

0.72

20.38

2.22

MUSTER

KSCGAFLGELPNGHVFVPQNLQLGAKVTFVCNTGYQLKGNSSSHCVLDGVESIWNSSVPVCE--

3t5oA2

0.23

0.22

6.84

1.08

HHsearch

SGCPQPVP-PENGFIRNKQLYLVGEDVEISCLTGFETVGYQYFRCLPDG---TWRQGDVECQRT

1ntjA2

0.74

0.72

20.38

1.00

FFAS-3D

KSCGAFLGELPNGHVFVPQNLQLGAKVTFVCNTGYQLKGNSSSHCVLDGVESIWNSSVPVCE--

2yraA

0.30

0.28

8.53

0.60

EigenThreader

SGCSDLP-EIQNGWKTTHTELVRGARITYQCDPGYDIVGSDTLTCQWD---LSWSSDPPFCEKT

2xrbA

0.30

9.00

1.88

CNFpred

KQCETPL-DPQNGIVHVNTDIRFGSSITYTCNEGYRLIGSSSAMCIISDQSVAWDAEAPICESI

1ojyC

0.24

0.23

7.30

1.33

DEthreader

IYCPAPP-QIDNGIIQERDHYGYRQSVTYACNKGFTMIGEHSIYCTVNNDEGEWSGPPPECRG-

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.7673

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	3o8eB	0.92	0.75	0.286	0.984	model1_3o8eB.pdb.gz
2	1ojyC	0.90	0.95	0.317	0.984	model1_1ojyC.pdb.gz
3	2o39C	0.89	0.94	0.286	0.984	model1_2o39C.pdb.gz
4	1ghqC1	0.88	1.13	0.222	0.984	model1_1ghqC1.pdb.gz
5	2q7zA	0.87	1.35	0.813	1.000	model1_2q7zA.pdb.gz
6	1w2rA	0.85	1.38	0.206	0.984	model1_1w2rA.pdb.gz
7	2atyA	0.85	1.38	0.222	0.984	model1_2atyA.pdb.gz
8	2gsxA	0.84	1.53	0.222	0.969	model1_2gsxA.pdb.gz
9	4c16A	0.84	0.96	0.271	0.922	model1_4c16A.pdb.gz
10	2yraA	0.83	1.02	0.300	0.938	model1_2yraA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0004872	0.61	receptor activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0065007	0.89	biological regulation
GO:0050789	0.88	regulation of biological process
GO:0050794	0.77	regulation of cellular process
GO:0048583	0.77	regulation of response to stimulus
GO:0050776	0.73	regulation of immune response
GO:0019222	0.71	regulation of metabolic process
GO:0048523	0.70	negative regulation of cellular process
GO:0080090	0.69	regulation of primary metabolic process
GO:0060255	0.68	regulation of macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0050896	0.67	response to stimulus
GO:0048518	0.67	positive regulation of biological process
GO:0031323	0.64	regulation of cellular metabolic process
GO:0051246	0.63	regulation of protein metabolic process
GO:0010468	0.63	regulation of gene expression
GO:0032101	0.62	regulation of response to external stimulus
GO:0009892	0.62	negative regulation of metabolic process
GO:0080134	0.61	regulation of response to stress
GO:0002697	0.60	regulation of immune effector process
GO:0002376	0.60	immune system process
GO:0048585	0.58	negative regulation of response to stimulus
GO:0031324	0.58	negative regulation of cellular metabolic process
GO:0030449	0.58	regulation of complement activation
GO:0010629	0.58	negative regulation of gene expression
GO:0006955	0.58	immune response
GO:0032268	0.57	regulation of cellular protein metabolic process
GO:0008152	0.56	metabolic process
GO:0045916	0.52	negative regulation of complement activation
GO:0071704	0.51	organic substance metabolic process
GO:0044699	0.50	single-organism process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	0.93	cell part
GO:0044425	0.75	membrane part
GO:0044459	0.63	plasma membrane part
GO:0032991	0.50	macromolecular complex
GO:0043234	0.49	protein complex
GO:0016021	0.45	integral component of membrane
GO:0016020	0.45	membrane
GO:0043227	0.41	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0009986	0.41	cell surface
GO:0044421	0.36	extracellular region part
GO:0098797	0.34	plasma membrane protein complex
GO:0044424	0.33	intracellular part
GO:0005887	0.33	integral component of plasma membrane
GO:0005886	0.32	plasma membrane
GO:0005579	0.30	membrane attack complex

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1p3wA	0.508	3.27	0.000	0.891	2.8.1.7 4.4.1.-	NA
2	0.060	2fyfA	0.542	3.23	0.051	0.906	2.6.1.52	NA
3	0.060	1kmmC	0.509	3.35	0.066	0.938	6.1.1.21	NA
4	0.060	2vgrD	0.491	3.84	0.048	0.984	1.3.7.2	6
5	0.060	3ihjA	0.498	3.20	0.125	0.875	2.6.1.2	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.07	1h030	0.889	0.93	0.323	0.969	0.90	III	complex1.pdb.gz	36,38,39,48,53,54,55,57
2	0.06	1cklD	0.863	1.14	0.286	0.984	0.63	UUU	complex2.pdb.gz	12,34,35,36
3	0.05	1ridA	0.629	2.65	0.274	0.969	1.35	UUU	complex3.pdb.gz	30,31,32,33,34,35,36,63
4	0.05	1q3xB	0.724	1.30	0.273	0.859	0.74	NA	complex4.pdb.gz	28,39,40,43,57
5	0.04	1elvA	0.780	1.54	0.217	0.938	0.51	UUU	complex5.pdb.gz	10,12,14,39

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.