D-I-TASSER Q16531

D-I-TASSER results for Q16531

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q16531
Protein Name: DNA damage-binding protein 1
Gene Name: DDB1

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q16531 (1140 residues)
MSYNYVVTAQKPTAVNGCVTGHFTSAEDLNLLIAKNTRLEIYVVTAEGLRPVKEVGMYGK
IAVMELFRPKGESKDLLFILTAKYNACILEYKQSGESIDIITRAHGNVQDRIGRPSETGI
IGIIDPECRMIGLRLYDGLFKVIPLDRDNKELKAFNIRLEELHVIDVKFLYGCQAPTICF
VYQDPQGRHVKTYEVSLREKEFNKGPWKQENVEAEASMVIAVPEPFGGAIIIGQESITYH
NGDKYLAIAPPIIKQSTIVCHNRVDPNGSRYLLGDMEGRLFMLLLEKEEQMDGTVTLKDL
RVELLGETSIAECLTYLDNGVVFVGSRLGDSQLVKLNVDSNEQGSYVVAMETFTNLGPIV
DMCVVDLERQGQGQLVTCSGAFKEGSLRIIRNGIGIHEHASIDLPGIKGLWPLRSDPNRE
TDDTLVLSFVGQTRVLMLNGEEVEETELMGFVDDQQTFFCGNVAHQQLIQITSASVRLVS
QEPKALVSEWKEPQAKNISVASCNSSQVVVAVGRALYYLQIHPQELRQISHTEMEHEVAC
LDITPLGDSNGLSPLCAIGLWTDISARILKLPSFELLHKEMLGGEIIPRSILMTTFESSH
YLLCALGDGALFYFGLNIETGLLSDRKKVTLGTQPTVLRTFRSLSTTNVFACSDRPTVIY
SSNHKLVFSNVNLKEVNYMCPLNSDGYPDSLALANNSTLTIGTIDEIQKLHIRTVPLYES
PRKICYQEVSQCFGVLSSRIEVQDTSGGTTALRPSASTQALSSSVSSSKLFSSSTAPHET
SFGEEVEVHNLLIIDQHTFEVLHAHQFLQNEYALSLVSCKLGKDPNTYFIVGTAMVYPEE
AEPKQGRIVVFQYSDGKLQTVAEKEVKGAVYSMVEFNGKLLASINSTVRLYEWTTEKELR
TECNHYNNIMALYLKTKGDFILVGDLMRSVLLLAYKPMEGNFEEIARDFNPNWMSAVEIL
DDDNFLGAENAFNLFVCQKDSAATTDEERQHLQEVGLFHLGEFVNVFCHGSLVMQNLGET
STPTQGSVLFGTVNGMIGLVTSLSESWYNLLLDMQNRLNKVIKSVGKIEHSFWRSFHTER
KTEPATGFIDGDLIESFLDISRPKMQEVVANLQYDDGSGMKREATADDLIKVVEELTRIH

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q16531-D1	1-108,311-719,1002-1140	656		MSYNYVVTAQKPTAVNGCVTGHFTSAEDLNLLIAKNTRLEIYVVTAEGLRPVKEVGMYGKIAVMELFRPKGESKDLLFILTAKYNACILEYKQSGESIDIITRAHGNVAECLTYLDNGVVFVGSRLGDSQLVKLNVDSNEQGSYVVAMETFTNLGPIVDMCVVDLERQGQGQLVTCSGAFKEGSLRIIRNGIGIHEHASIDLPGIKGLWPLRSDPNRETDDTLVLSFVGQTRVLMLNGEEVEETELMGFVDDQQTFFCGNVAHQQLIQITSASVRLVSQEPKALVSEWKEPQAKNISVASCNSSQVVVAVGRALYYLQIHPQELRQISHTEMEHEVACLDITPLGDSNGLSPLCAIGLWTDISARILKLPSFELLHKEMLGGEIIPRSILMTTFESSHYLLCALGDGALFYFGLNIETGLLSDRKKVTLGTQPTVLRTFRSLSTTNVFACSDRPTVIYSSNHKLVFSNVNLKEVNYMCPLNSDGYPDSLALANNSTLTIGTIDEIQKLHIRTVPLYEEFVNVFCHGSLVMQNLGETSTPTQGSVLFGTVNGMIGLVTSLSESWYNLLLDMQNRLNKVIKSVGKIEHSFWRSFHTERKTEPATGFIDGDLIESFLDISRPKMQEVVANLQYDDGSGMKREATADDLIKVVEELTRIH
2	Q16531-D2	109-310	202		QDRIGRPSETGIIGIIDPECRMIGLRLYDGLFKVIPLDRDNKELKAFNIRLEELHVIDVKFLYGCQAPTICFVYQDPQGRHVKTYEVSLREKEFNKGPWKQENVEAEASMVIAVPEPFGGAIIIGQESITYHNGDKYLAIAPPIIKQSTIVCHNRVDPNGSRYLLGDMEGRLFMLLLEKEEQMDGTVTLKDLRVELLGETSI
3	Q16531-D3	720-910	191		SPRKICYQEVSQCFGVLSSRIEVQDTSGGTTALRPSASTQALSSSVSSSKLFSSSTAPHETSFGEEVEVHNLLIIDQHTFEVLHAHQFLQNEYALSLVSCKLGKDPNTYFIVGTAMVYPEEAEPKQGRIVVFQYSDGKLQTVAEKEVKGAVYSMVEFNGKLLASINSTVRLYEWTTEKELRTECNHYNNIM
4	Q16531-D4	911-1001	91		ALYLKTKGDFILVGDLMRSVLLLAYKPMEGNFEEIARDFNPNWMSAVEILDDDNFLGAENAFNLFVCQKDSAATTDEERQHLQEVGLFHLG

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.74

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	3ei2A	0.96	1.35	0.988	0.966	model1_3ei2A.pdb.gz
2	6bllA	0.84	3.87	0.192	0.928	model1_6bllA.pdb.gz
3	6eojA	0.83	4.09	0.147	0.924	model1_6eojA.pdb.gz
4	5hy7A	0.80	5.14	0.171	0.925	model1_5hy7A.pdb.gz
5	7abiE	0.80	5.24	0.184	0.925	model1_7abiE.pdb.gz
6	5lqwX	0.75	5.15	0.112	0.876	model1_5lqwX.pdb.gz
7	5nrlP	0.74	5.39	0.146	0.873	model1_5nrlP.pdb.gz
8	6jp6A	0.46	4.55	0.095	0.528	model1_6jp6A.pdb.gz
9	6p2kA	0.44	5.30	0.057	0.523	model1_6p2kA.pdb.gz
10	4lgnA	0.43	5.43	0.057	0.515	model1_4lgnA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0003676	1.00	nucleic acid binding
GO:0003677	0.71	DNA binding
GO:0003684	0.68	damaged DNA binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0009987	0.98	cellular process
GO:0044260	0.97	cellular macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0044238	0.97	primary metabolic process
GO:0090304	0.92	nucleic acid metabolic process
GO:0019538	0.68	protein metabolic process
GO:0006508	0.66	proteolysis
GO:0006511	0.65	ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process
GO:0043161	0.64	proteasome-mediated ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process
GO:0050896	0.63	response to stimulus
GO:0006950	0.62	response to stress
GO:0006974	0.61	cellular response to DNA damage stimulus
GO:0006259	0.61	DNA metabolic process
GO:0006289	0.60	nucleotide-excision repair

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	1.00	intracellular part
GO:0043231	0.96	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0005634	0.95	nucleus
GO:0032991	0.82	macromolecular complex
GO:0043234	0.78	protein complex
GO:1990234	0.71	transferase complex
GO:0031461	0.69	cullin-RING ubiquitin ligase complex

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1s0kA	0.233	5.60	0.066	0.281	3.2.1.18	NA
2	0.060	1ea0A	0.264	9.96	0.037	0.432	1.4.1.13	NA
3	0.060	1kb0A	0.284	5.37	0.064	0.339	1.1.99.-	NA
4	0.060	1e5tA	0.297	7.56	0.051	0.405	3.4.21.26	NA
5	0.060	1xc6A	0.265	9.08	0.033	0.406	3.2.1.23	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.01	1n6fA	0.350	7.30	0.045	0.468	0.19	DKT	complex1.pdb.gz	324,325,326,327,385,386,718
2	0.01	3dduA	0.329	6.71	0.041	0.421	0.14	552	complex2.pdb.gz	9,12,34,356
3	0.01	3eq8A	0.294	7.54	0.043	0.403	0.12	X98	complex3.pdb.gz	36,275,276,326
4	0.01	2oaeA	0.322	7.07	0.058	0.425	0.20	AIL	complex4.pdb.gz	325,329,356
5	0.01	1n6dA	0.350	7.27	0.043	0.468	0.18	III	complex5.pdb.gz	326,327,328,385,386,387,718
6	0.01	2ebsA	0.400	5.83	0.060	0.490	0.11	UUU	complex6.pdb.gz	39,312,313,326,379,380

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.