D-I-TASSER Q15788

D-I-TASSER results for Q15788

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q15788
Protein Name: Nuclear receptor coactivator 1
Gene Name: NCOA1

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q15788 (1441 residues)
MSGLGDSSSDPANPDSHKRKGSPCDTLASSTEKRRREQENKYLEELAELLSANISDIDSL
SVKPDKCKILKKTVDQIQLMKRMEQEKSTTDDDVQKSDISSSSQGVIEKESLGPLLLEAL
DGFFFVVNCEGRIVFVSENVTSYLGYNQEELMNTSVYSILHVGDHAEFVKNLLPKSLVNG
VPWPQEATRRNSHTFNCRMLIHPPDEPGTENQEACQRYEVMQCFTVSQPKSIQEDGEDFQ
SCLICIARRLPRPPAITGVESFMTKQDTTGKIISIDTSSLRAAGRTGWEDLVRKCIYAFF
QPQGREPSYARQLFQEVMTRGTASSPSYRFILNDGTMLSAHTKCKLCYPQSPDMQPFIMG
IHIIDREHSGLSPQDDTNSGMSIPRVNPSVNPSISPAHGVARSSTLPPSNSNMVSTRINR
QQSSDLHSSSHSNSSNSQGSFGCSPGSQIVANVALNQGQASSQSSNPSLNLNNSPMEGTG
ISLAQFMSPRRQVTSGLATRPRMPNNSFPPNISTLSSPVGMTSSACNNNNRSYSNIPVTS
LQGMNEGPNNSVGFSASSPVLRQMSSQNSPSRLNIQPAKAESKDNKEIASILNEMIQSDN
SSSDGKPLDSGLLHNNDRLSDGDSKYSQTSHKLVQLLTTTAEQQLRHADIDTSCKDVLSC
TGTSNSASANSSGGSCPSSHSSLTERHKILHRLLQEGSPSDITTLSVEPDKKDSASTSVS
VTGQVQGNSSIKLELDASKKKESKDHQLLRYLLDKDEKDLRSTPNLSLDDVKVKVEKKEQ
MDPCNTNPTPMTKPTPEEIKLEAQSQFTADLDQFDQLLPTLEKAAQLPGLCETDRMDGAV
TSVTIKSEILPASLQSATARPTSRLNRLPELELEAIDNQFGQPGTGDQIPWTNNTVTAIN
QSKSEDQCISSQLDELLCPPTTVEGRNDEKALLEQLVSFLSGKDETELAELDRALGIDKL
VQGGGLDVLSERFPPQQATPPLIMEERPNLYSQPYSSPSPTANLPSPFQGMVRQKPSLGT
MPVQVTPPRGAFSPGMGMQPRQTLNRPPAAPNQLRLQLQQRLQGQQQLIHQNRQAILNQF
AATAPVGINMRSGMQQQITPQPPLNAQMLAQRQRELYSQQHRQRQLIQQQRAMLMRQQSF
GNNLPPSSGLPVQMGNPRLPQGAPQQFPYPPNYGTNPGTPPASTSPFSQLAANPEASLAN
RNSMVSRGMTGNIGGQFGTGINPQMQQNVFQYPGAGMVPQGEANFAPSLSPGSSMVPMPI
PPPQSSLLQQTPPASGYQSPDMKAWQQGAIGNNNVFSQAVQNQPTPAQPGVYNNMSITVS
MAGGNTNVQNMNPMMAQMQMSSLQMPGMNTVCPEQINDPALRHTGLYCNQLSSTDLLKTE
ADGTQQVQQVQVFADVQCTVNLVGGDPYLNQPGPLGTQKPTSGPQTPQAQQKSLLQQLLT
E

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q15788-D1	1-358	358		MSGLGDSSSDPANPDSHKRKGSPCDTLASSTEKRRREQENKYLEELAELLSANISDIDSLSVKPDKCKILKKTVDQIQLMKRMEQEKSTTDDDVQKSDISSSSQGVIEKESLGPLLLEALDGFFFVVNCEGRIVFVSENVTSYLGYNQEELMNTSVYSILHVGDHAEFVKNLLPKSLVNGVPWPQEATRRNSHTFNCRMLIHPPDEPGTENQEACQRYEVMQCFTVSQPKSIQEDGEDFQSCLICIARRLPRPPAITGVESFMTKQDTTGKIISIDTSSLRAAGRTGWEDLVRKCIYAFFQPQGREPSYARQLFQEVMTRGTASSPSYRFILNDGTMLSAHTKCKLCYPQSPDMQPFI
2	Q15788-D2	359-1062	704		MGIHIIDREHSGLSPQDDTNSGMSIPRVNPSVNPSISPAHGVARSSTLPPSNSNMVSTRINRQQSSDLHSSSHSNSSNSQGSFGCSPGSQIVANVALNQGQASSQSSNPSLNLNNSPMEGTGISLAQFMSPRRQVTSGLATRPRMPNNSFPPNISTLSSPVGMTSSACNNNNRSYSNIPVTSLQGMNEGPNNSVGFSASSPVLRQMSSQNSPSRLNIQPAKAESKDNKEIASILNEMIQSDNSSSDGKPLDSGLLHNNDRLSDGDSKYSQTSHKLVQLLTTTAEQQLRHADIDTSCKDVLSCTGTSNSASANSSGGSCPSSHSSLTERHKILHRLLQEGSPSDITTLSVEPDKKDSASTSVSVTGQVQGNSSIKLELDASKKKESKDHQLLRYLLDKDEKDLRSTPNLSLDDVKVKVEKKEQMDPCNTNPTPMTKPTPEEIKLEAQSQFTADLDQFDQLLPTLEKAAQLPGLCETDRMDGAVTSVTIKSEILPASLQSATARPTSRLNRLPELELEAIDNQFGQPGTGDQIPWTNNTVTAINQSKSEDQCISSQLDELLCPPTTVEGRNDEKALLEQLVSFLSGKDETELAELDRALGIDKLVQGGGLDVLSERFPPQQATPPLIMEERPNLYSQPYSSPSPTANLPSPFQGMVRQKPSLGTMPVQVTPPRGAFSPGMGMQPRQTLNRPPAAPNQLRLQLQQRL
3	Q15788-D3	1063-1309	247		QGQQQLIHQNRQAILNQFAATAPVGINMRSGMQQQITPQPPLNAQMLAQRQRELYSQQHRQRQLIQQQRAMLMRQQSFGNNLPPSSGLPVQMGNPRLPQGAPQQFPYPPNYGTNPGTPPASTSPFSQLAANPEASLANRNSMVSRGMTGNIGGQFGTGINPQMQQNVFQYPGAGMVPQGEANFAPSLSPGSSMVPMPIPPPQSSLLQQTPPASGYQSPDMKAWQQGAIGNNNVFSQAVQNQPTPAQP
4	Q15788-D4	1310-1441	132		GVYNNMSITVSMAGGNTNVQNMNPMMAQMQMSSLQMPGMNTVCPEQINDPALRHTGLYCNQLSSTDLLKTEADGTQQVQQVQVFADVQCTVNLVGGDPYLNQPGPLGTQKPTSGPQTPQAQQKSLLQQLLTE

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.36

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	6zz6D	0.47	2.75	0.055	0.489	model1_6zz6D.pdb.gz
2	6yufD	0.43	4.51	0.060	0.484	model1_6yufD.pdb.gz
3	6wg3E	0.42	4.58	0.040	0.474	model1_6wg3E.pdb.gz
4	5t8vA	0.39	5.81	0.055	0.471	model1_5t8vA.pdb.gz
5	3s4wB	0.32	8.43	0.054	0.446	model1_3s4wB.pdb.gz
6	6qj3A	0.32	6.38	0.050	0.391	model1_6qj3A.pdb.gz
7	6yvuD	0.32	5.96	0.056	0.378	model1_6yvuD.pdb.gz
8	5me3A	0.32	6.77	0.040	0.396	model1_5me3A.pdb.gz
9	3s4wA	0.30	8.72	0.046	0.427	model1_3s4wA.pdb.gz
10	5f0oA	0.30	7.12	0.049	0.386	model1_5f0oA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0005102	0.66	receptor binding
GO:0000989	0.59	transcription factor activity, transcription factor binding
GO:0035257	0.57	nuclear hormone receptor binding
GO:0003712	0.57	transcription cofactor activity
GO:0003713	0.55	transcription coactivator activity
GO:0016922	0.54	ligand-dependent nuclear receptor binding
GO:0030374	0.53	ligand-dependent nuclear receptor transcription coactivator activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0065007	0.95	biological regulation
GO:0050789	0.95	regulation of biological process
GO:0050794	0.94	regulation of cellular process
GO:0006355	0.92	regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
GO:0048522	0.83	positive regulation of cellular process
GO:0009893	0.83	positive regulation of metabolic process
GO:1902680	0.82	positive regulation of RNA biosynthetic process
GO:0010628	0.82	positive regulation of gene expression
GO:0050896	0.81	response to stimulus
GO:0045893	0.81	positive regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
GO:0006357	0.79	regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter
GO:0009987	0.77	cellular process
GO:0042221	0.72	response to chemical
GO:0045944	0.71	positive regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter
GO:0010033	0.65	response to organic substance
GO:0051716	0.57	cellular response to stimulus
GO:0070887	0.55	cellular response to chemical stimulus
GO:0007165	0.54	signal transduction
GO:0071310	0.52	cellular response to organic substance
GO:0009719	0.51	response to endogenous stimulus
GO:0032870	0.50	cellular response to hormone stimulus

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	1.00	intracellular part
GO:0043229	0.81	intracellular organelle
GO:0043231	0.80	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0005634	0.79	nucleus
GO:0044422	0.56	organelle part
GO:0044446	0.55	intracellular organelle part
GO:0032991	0.52	macromolecular complex

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1t3tA	0.226	9.54	0.039	0.336	6.3.5.3	NA
2	0.060	2dqmA	0.226	8.59	0.043	0.319	3.4.11.2	NA
3	0.060	2vumA	0.243	10.15	0.037	0.378	2.7.7.6	NA
4	0.060	2vz8A	0.216	10.46	0.019	0.341	2.3.1.85	NA
5	0.060	2vkzG	0.233	9.92	0.036	0.355	2.3.1.38 3.1.2.14	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

No Binding sites was predicted

Click to view	Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.