D-I-TASSER Q05655-D3

D-I-TASSER results for Q05655-D3

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q05655 (333 residues)
CNINNFIFHKVLGKGSFGKVLLGELKGRGEYFAIKALKKDVVLIDDDVECTMVEKRVLTL
AAENPFLTHLICTFQTKDHLFFVMEFLNGGDLMYHIQDKGRFELYRATFYAAEIMCGLQF
LHSKGIIYRDLKLDNVLLDRDGHIKIADFGMCKENIFGESRASTFCGTPDYIAPEILQGL
KYTFSVDWWSFGVLLYEMLIGQSPFHGDDEDELFESIRVDTPHYPRWITKESKDILEKLF
EREPTKRLGVTGNIKIHPFFKTINWTLLEKRRLEPPFRPKVKSPRDYSNFDQEFLNEKAR
LSYSDKNLIDSMDQSAFAGFSFVNPKFEHLLED

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| CNINNFIFHKVLGKGSFGKVLLGELKGRGEYFAIKALKKDVVLIDDDVECTMVEKRVLTLAAENPFLTHLICTFQTKDHLFFVMEFLNGGDLMYHIQDKGRFELYRATFYAAEIMCGLQFLHSKGIIYRDLKLDNVLLDRDGHIKIADFGMCKENIFGESRASTFCGTPDYIAPEILQGLKYTFSVDWWSFGVLLYEMLIGQSPFHGDDEDELFESIRVDTPHYPRWITKESKDILEKLFEREPTKRLGVTGNIKIHPFFKTINWTLLEKRRLEPPFRPKVKSPRDYSNFDQEFLNEKARLSYSDKNLIDSMDQSAFAGFSFVNPKFEHLLED
Prediction	CCHHHCSSSSSSSSCCCCSSSSSSSCCCCCSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCSCCSSSSSSCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCSCCCCCHHHSSSCCCCCSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSCCCCHHHCCHHHHCCCCCCCSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCHHHCCCCCHHHHCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHCCHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHCCCCCSSCHCHHHHHCC
Confidence	983674367777517871699999918995899998638998754279999999999997058981721478872699589998367873799999861899828989999999999999997294435798466365699978981367652698999837634788455238898189999512168789999999738999999999999999980999999999999999999980069666489818987096547899999984699999778689953221157154149987899986556610110139983438116654239
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| CNINNFIFHKVLGKGSFGKVLLGELKGRGEYFAIKALKKDVVLIDDDVECTMVEKRVLTLAAENPFLTHLICTFQTKDHLFFVMEFLNGGDLMYHIQDKGRFELYRATFYAAEIMCGLQFLHSKGIIYRDLKLDNVLLDRDGHIKIADFGMCKENIFGESRASTFCGTPDYIAPEILQGLKYTFSVDWWSFGVLLYEMLIGQSPFHGDDEDELFESIRVDTPHYPRWITKESKDILEKLFEREPTKRLGVTGNIKIHPFFKTINWTLLEKRRLEPPFRPKVKSPRDYSNFDQEFLNEKARLSYSDKNLIDSMDQSAFAGFSFVNPKFEHLLED
Prediction	752720400100131020102002227553000000021640165531510320140044316100001010001066200000001101000110353640526301000000000021017340000002020000035000000000000440467630200001110000000374614200000000000000000200032733540053027550510540164023004400642165013337203614004702473036361613030406466104102640373525233456432564347305412111441442378
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180                 200                 220                 240                 260                 280                 300                 320

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCHHHCSSSSSSSSCCCCSSSSSSSCCCCCSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCSCCSSSSSSCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCSCCCCCHHHSSSCCCCCSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSCCCCHHHCCHHHHCCCCCCCSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCHHHCCCCCHHHHCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHCCHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHCCCCCSSCHCHHHHHCC
CNINNFIFHKVLGKGSFGKVLLGELKGRGEYFAIKALKKDVVLIDDDVECTMVEKRVLTLAAENPFLTHLICTFQTKDHLFFVMEFLNGGDLMYHIQDKGRFELYRATFYAAEIMCGLQFLHSKGIIYRDLKLDNVLLDRDGHIKIADFGMCKENIFGESRASTFCGTPDYIAPEILQGLKYTFSVDWWSFGVLLYEMLIGQSPFHGDDEDELFESIRVDTPHYPRWITKESKDILEKLFEREPTKRLGVTGNIKIHPFFKTINWTLLEKRRLEPPFRPKVKSPRDYSNFDQEFLNEKARLSYSDKNLIDSMDQSAFAGFSFVNPKFEHLLED

2jedA

0.72

0.65

18.32

1.33

DEthreader

LKIEDFELHKMLGKGSFGKVFLAEFKKTNQFFAIKALKKDVVLMDDDVECTMVEKRVLSLAWEHPFLTHMFCTFQTKENLFFVMEYLNGGDLMYHIQSCHKFDLSRATFYAAEIILGLQFLHSKGIVYRDLKLDNILLDKDGHIKIADFGMCKENMLGDAKTNEFCGTPDYIAPEILLGQKYNHSVDWWSFGVLLYEMLIGQSPFHGQDEEELFHSIRMDNPFYPRWLEKEAKDLLVKLFVREPEKRLGVRGDIRQHPLFREINWEELERKEIDPPFRPKVKSPFDCSNFDK--EFLNE----------------------------------

2jedA

0.71

0.69

19.70

2.13

SPARKS-K

LKIEDFELHKMLGKGSFGKVFLAEFKKTNQFFAIKALKKDVVLMDDDVECTMVEKRVLSLAWEHPFLTHMFCTFQTKENLFFVMEYLNGGDLMYHIQSCHKFDLSRATFYAAEIILGLQFLHSKGIVYRDLKLDNILLDKDGHIKIADFGMCKENMLGDAKTNEFCGTPDYIAPEILLGQKYNHSVDWWSFGVLLYEMLIGQSPFHGQDEEELFHSIRMDNPFYPRWLEKEAKDLLVKLFVREPEKRLGVRGDIRQHPLFREINWEELERKEIDPPFRPKVKSPFDCSNFDKEFLNEKPRLFAD-RALINSMDQNMFRNFFMNPG--------

3c4wB

0.36

0.34

10.02

0.50

MapAlign

MGEDWFLDFRVLGRGGFGEVFACQMKATGKLYACKKLNKKRLKKRKGYQGAMVEKKILAKVH-SRFIVSLAYAFETKTDLCLVMTIMNGGDIRYHIYNVPGFQEPRAIFYTAQIVSGLEHLHQRNIIYRDLKPENVLLDDDGNVRISDLGLAVELKAGQTKTKGYAGTPGFMAPELLLGEEYDFSVDYFALGVTLYEMIAARGPFRV-ENKELKQRVLEQAVTYPDKFSPASKDFCEALLQKDPEKRLGFCDGLRTHPLFRDISWRQLEAGMLTPPFVPDS----RTVYAKDTEFFQEFASGTCPIPWQEEMIETGV----------------

3d0eA

0.44

0.41

12.14

0.38

CEthreader

VTMNDFDYLKLLGKGTFGKVILVREKATGRYYAMKILRKEVIIAKDEVAHTVTESRVLQNT-RHPFLTALKYAFQTHDRLCFVMEYANGGELFFHLSRERVFTEERARFYGAEIVSALEYLHSRDVVYRDIKLENLMLDKDGHIKITDFGLCKEGISDGATM-KFCGTPEYLAPEVLEDNDYGRAVDWWGLGVVMYEMMCGRLPFYNQDHERLFELILMEEIRFPRTLSPEAKSLLAGLLKKDPKQRLGGAKEVMEHRFFLSINWQDVVQKKLLPPFKPQVTSEVDTRYFDDEFTAQSITIPPDQRTHFPQFDYSASIR--------------

2jedA

0.72

0.70

19.78

1.88

MUSTER

LKIEDFELHKMLGKGSFGKVFLAEFKKTNQFFAIKALKKDVVLMDDDVECTMVEKRVLSLAWEHPFLTHMFCTFQTKENLFFVMEYLNGGDLMYHIQSCHKFDLSRATFYAAEIILGLQFLHSKGIVYRDLKLDNILLDKDGHIKIADFGMCKENMLGDAKTNEFCGTPDYIAPEILLGQKYNHSVDWWSFGVLLYEMLIGQSPFHGQDEEELFHSIRMDNPFYPRWLEKEAKDLLVKLFVREPEKRLGVRGDIRQHPLFREINWEELERKEIDPPFRPKVKSPFDCSNFDKEFLNEKPRLFA-DRALINSMDQNMFRNFFMNPG--------

3pfqA

0.57

0.56

16.14

0.88

HHsearch

PPLTDFNFLMVLGKGSFGKVMLSERKGTDELYAVKILKKDVVIQDDDVECTMVEKRVLALPGKPPFLTQLHSCFQTMDRLYFVMEYVNGGDLMYHIQQVGRFKEPHAVFYAAEIAIGLFFLQSKGIIYRDLKLDNVMLDSEGHIKIADFGMCKENIW-DGVTTKFCGTPDYIAPEIIAYQPYGKSVDWWAFGVLLYEMLAGQAPFEGEDEDELFQSIMEHNVAYPKSMSKEAVAICKGLMTKHPGKRLGCERDIKEHAFFRYIDWEKLERKEIQPPYKPKASGR-NAENFDRFFTRHPPVLPPDQE-VIRNIDQSEFEGFFV-NSEFLKP---

2jedA

0.72

0.69

19.69

3.61

FFAS-3D

LKIEDFELHKMLGKGSFGKVFLAEFKKTNQFFAIKALKKDVVLMDDDVECTMVEKRVLSLAWEHPFLTHMFCTFQTKENLFFVMEYLNGGDLMYHIQSCHKFDLSRATFYAAEIILGLQFLHSKGIVYRDLKLDNILLDKDGHIKIADFGMCKENMLGDAKTNEFCGTPDYIAPEILLGQKYNHSVDWWSFGVLLYEMLIGQSPFHGQDEEELFHSIRMDNPFYPRWLEKEAKDLLVKLFVREPEKRLGVRGDIRQHPLFREINWEELERKEIDPPFRPKVKSPFDCSNFDKEFLNEKPRLFAD-RALINSMDQNMFRNFFM-----------

4fr4A

0.28

0.27

8.35

0.75

EigenThreader

VNFDHFEILRAIGKGSFGKVCIVQKNDTKKMYAMKYMNKQKCVERNEVRNVFKELQIMQGLE-HPFLVNLWYSFQDEEDMFMVVDLLLGGDLRYHLQQNVHFKEETVKLFICELVMALDYLQNQRIIHRDMKPDNILLDEHGHVHITDFNIAAMLPRETQITTMAGT-KPYMAPEMFSGAGYSFAVDWWSLGVTAYELLRGRRPYHSTSSKEIVHTFETTVVTYPSAWSQEMVSLLKKLLEPNPDQRFSQLSDVQNFPYMNDINWDAVFQKRLIPGFIPNKGRLN--CDPTF------ELEEMILESKPKEKDMQKEFIIFN-REKVNRDFNK

5f9eA

0.71

20.22

3.38

CNFpred

LKIEDFELHKMLGKGSFGKVFLAEFKKTNQFFAIKALKKDVVLMDDDVECTMVEKRVLSLAWEHPFLTHMFCTFQTKENLFFVMEYLNGGDLMYHIQSCHKFDLSRATFYAAEIILGLQFLHSKGIVYRDLKLDNILLDKDGHIKIADFGMCKENMLGDAKTNEFCGTPDYIAPEILLGQKYNHSVDWWSFGVLLYEMLIGQSPFHGQDEEELFHSIRMDNPFYPRWLEKEAKDLLVKLFVREPEKRLGVRGDIRQHPLFREINWEELERKEIDPPFRPKVKSPFDCSNFDKEFLNEKPRLMFADRALINSMDQNMFRNFMFMNPGMERLISH

6pjxA

0.36

0.32

9.57

1.33

DEthreader

VTKNTFRQYRVLGKGGFGEVCACQVRATGKMYACKRLEKKRIKKRKGESMALNEKQILEKV-NSQFVVNLAYAYETKDALCLVLTIMNGGDLKFHIYMGPGFEEERALFYAAEILCGLEDLHHENTVYRDLKPENILLDDYGHIRISDLGLAVKIPEG-DLIRGRVGTVGYMAPEVLNNQRYGLSPDYWGLGCLIYEMIEGQSPFRGVKREEVDRRVLETEEVYSHKFSEEAKSICKMLLTKDAKQRLGEAAEVKRHPFFRNMNFKRLEAGMLDPPFVPDPR---A-VYCKD--VLDI--EQ--FS--TV-KG--------------------

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.9284

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	2jedA	0.96	1.01	0.725	0.973	model1_2jedA.pdb.gz
2	4crsA	0.92	1.28	0.483	0.949	model1_4crsA.pdb.gz
3	3d0eA	0.92	1.37	0.435	0.952	model1_3d0eA.pdb.gz
4	3pfqA	0.92	1.87	0.558	0.961	model1_3pfqA.pdb.gz
5	6pjxA	0.91	2.35	0.335	0.970	model1_6pjxA.pdb.gz
6	3iw4C	0.90	1.64	0.546	0.940	model1_3iw4C.pdb.gz
7	4yhjA	0.90	2.49	0.360	0.976	model1_4yhjA.pdb.gz
8	3c4wB	0.89	2.25	0.365	0.955	model1_3c4wB.pdb.gz
9	1cdkA	0.89	1.55	0.398	0.928	model1_1cdkA.pdb.gz
10	6c0tA	0.88	1.61	0.369	0.928	model1_6c0tA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0016301	0.97	kinase activity
GO:0004672	0.96	protein kinase activity
GO:0004674	0.87	protein serine/threonine kinase activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0009987	0.91	cellular process
GO:0065007	0.86	biological regulation
GO:0050789	0.85	regulation of biological process
GO:0050794	0.84	regulation of cellular process
GO:0008152	0.84	metabolic process
GO:0071704	0.83	organic substance metabolic process
GO:0044238	0.82	primary metabolic process
GO:0044237	0.82	cellular metabolic process
GO:0043170	0.82	macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0044260	0.81	cellular macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0016310	0.75	phosphorylation
GO:0006464	0.75	cellular protein modification process
GO:0006468	0.74	protein phosphorylation
GO:0007165	0.67	signal transduction
GO:0035556	0.51	intracellular signal transduction

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	1.00	cell part
GO:0044424	0.90	intracellular part
GO:0043226	0.62	organelle
GO:0043229	0.60	intracellular organelle
GO:0043227	0.58	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0043231	0.56	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0005634	0.51	nucleus
GO:0005737	0.50	cytoplasm

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.508	2jedA	0.963	1.02	0.727	0.979	2.7.11.13	NA
2	0.452	2np8A	0.732	1.57	0.282	0.766	2.7.11.1	130,132,137
3	0.439	3efwB	0.688	1.62	0.287	0.721	2.7.11.1	130,132,137,147,149,186
4	0.398	2bfyB	0.734	2.26	0.294	0.799	2.7.11.1	12,14,35,90,137
5	0.333	3d0eA	0.927	1.39	0.436	0.958	2.7.11.1	91

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.70	2jedA	0.963	1.02	0.727	0.979	1.81	LG8	complex1.pdb.gz	12,13,17,20,33,35,54,68,85,86,87,91,134,137,147,148,290
2	0.54	3ocbB	0.923	1.02	0.449	0.943	1.64	XM1	complex2.pdb.gz	15,18,19,20,33,35,84,85,87,134,135,137,147,148,290
3	0.53	2uw8A	0.891	1.45	0.395	0.928	1.52	GVQ	complex3.pdb.gz	12,13,14,18,19,20,33,91,134,135,147,290
4	0.51	3mvjA	0.885	1.57	0.395	0.928	1.47	XFE	complex4.pdb.gz	12,20,33,85,87,91,137,147,290
5	0.49	3aglB	0.892	1.45	0.395	0.928	1.47	A03	complex5.pdb.gz	14,15,16,17,18,20,33,37,68,85,86,87,91,93,97,133,134,137,147,151,170,197,290
6	0.40	3ocbA	0.909	1.09	0.455	0.931	1.54	III	complex6.pdb.gz	91,93,130,132,133,134,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,197,203,206
7	0.39	3nx8A	0.890	1.52	0.395	0.928	1.04	IPH	complex7.pdb.gz	13,14,20,91,134,135,147
8	0.39	3c4xB	0.860	2.04	0.373	0.919	1.36	ATP	complex8.pdb.gz	12,13,15,16,20,33,35,85,87,137,148
9	0.37	3e8eI	0.888	1.52	0.392	0.928	1.47	III	complex9.pdb.gz	16,47,50,91,93,97,132,133,134,151,164,165,167,168,169,170,197,201,202,203,206,207,214,223
10	0.35	1szmB	0.795	2.52	0.352	0.880	1.36	BI4	complex10.pdb.gz	12,14,20,33,35,84,85,86,87,88,90

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.