D-I-TASSER Q01628

D-I-TASSER results for Q01628

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: Q01628
Protein Name: Interferon-induced transmembrane protein 3
Gene Name: IFITM3

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>Q01628 (133 residues)
MNHTVQTFFSPVNSGQPPNYEMLKEEHEVAVLGAPHNPAPPTSTVIHIRSETSVPDHVVW
SLFNTLFMNPCCLGFIAFAYSVKSRDRKMVGDVTGAQAYASTAKCLNIWALILGILMTIL
LIVIPVLIFQAYG

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	Q01628-D1	1-133	133		MNHTVQTFFSPVNSGQPPNYEMLKEEHEVAVLGAPHNPAPPTSTVIHIRSETSVPDHVVWSLFNTLFMNPCCLGFIAFAYSVKSRDRKMVGDVTGAQAYASTAKCLNIWALILGILMTILLIVIPVLIFQAYG

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.6187

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	6rjwA	0.62	3.38	0.081	0.827	model1_6rjwA.pdb.gz
2	1w27A	0.60	4.05	0.083	0.872	model1_1w27A.pdb.gz
3	3nz4A	0.59	3.91	0.106	0.895	model1_3nz4A.pdb.gz
4	6at7B	0.58	4.07	0.091	0.872	model1_6at7B.pdb.gz
5	2dgjA	0.58	3.03	0.019	0.782	model1_2dgjA.pdb.gz
6	3ayfA	0.57	4.59	0.031	0.902	model1_3ayfA.pdb.gz
7	1y2mB1	0.57	3.96	0.097	0.842	model1_1y2mB1.pdb.gz
8	2rjsB2	0.52	3.48	0.048	0.744	model1_2rjsB2.pdb.gz
9	3mk7A	0.46	3.18	0.083	0.609	model1_3mk7A.pdb.gz
10	1gkmA2	0.45	2.25	0.100	0.556	model1_1gkmA2.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0004871	0.43	signal transducer activity
GO:1901363	0.41	heterocyclic compound binding
GO:0097159	0.41	organic cyclic compound binding
GO:0005057	0.41	receptor signaling protein activity
GO:0003824	0.34	catalytic activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0065007	0.81	biological regulation
GO:0050789	0.80	regulation of biological process
GO:0050794	0.79	regulation of cellular process
GO:0009987	0.77	cellular process
GO:0050896	0.67	response to stimulus
GO:0007165	0.65	signal transduction
GO:0016032	0.64	viral process
GO:0010033	0.64	response to organic substance
GO:0048523	0.63	negative regulation of cellular process
GO:0043207	0.63	response to external biotic stimulus
GO:0034097	0.63	response to cytokine
GO:0007166	0.63	cell surface receptor signaling pathway
GO:0035455	0.62	response to interferon-alpha
GO:0019221	0.62	cytokine-mediated signaling pathway
GO:0009615	0.62	response to virus
GO:0046597	0.61	negative regulation of viral entry into host cell
GO:0045071	0.61	negative regulation of viral genome replication
GO:0035456	0.61	response to interferon-beta
GO:0034341	0.61	response to interferon-gamma
GO:0002376	0.56	immune system process
GO:0060337	0.55	type I interferon signaling pathway

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	0.99	cell part
GO:0016020	0.95	membrane
GO:0005886	0.87	plasma membrane
GO:0044424	0.74	intracellular part
GO:0043226	0.54	organelle
GO:0044444	0.53	cytoplasmic part
GO:0043227	0.52	membrane-bounded organelle

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1jswB	0.516	3.48	0.038	0.707	4.3.1.1	NA
2	0.060	1q5nA	0.506	3.57	0.065	0.737	5.5.1.2	NA
3	0.060	1qdbA	0.501	3.89	0.063	0.714	1.7.2.2	91
4	0.060	2r0nA	0.500	3.94	0.030	0.722	1.3.99.7	112
5	0.060	2z1qB	0.488	3.82	0.015	0.714	1.3.99.3	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.01	1ivhB	0.509	3.73	0.061	0.714	0.17	COS	complex1.pdb.gz	74,75,78,81
2	0.01	2ix5B	0.519	3.62	0.031	0.707	0.25	FAD	complex2.pdb.gz	78,111,112,115
3	0.01	1ivhC	0.508	3.74	0.061	0.714	0.17	COS	complex3.pdb.gz	106,107,110,113,116,117
4	0.01	3ddlB	0.505	3.76	0.056	0.714	0.18	SXN	complex4.pdb.gz	72,75,76,79,82,85,86
5	0.01	2o7eD	0.540	4.14	0.069	0.804	0.22	PMI	complex5.pdb.gz	60,74,111
6	0.01	2dvlA	0.512	3.89	0.045	0.722	0.11	FAD	complex6.pdb.gz	55,57,85
7	0.01	2ix5D	0.518	3.62	0.023	0.707	0.23	CAA	complex7.pdb.gz	73,74,97,99
8	0.01	3nz4A	0.585	4.48	0.060	0.947	0.23	TCA	complex8.pdb.gz	59,60,104
9	0.01	1zww0	0.424	2.99	0.053	0.564	0.34	III	complex9.pdb.gz	72,75,76,79,82,96,97,98,101,102,109
10	0.01	2j91A	0.500	3.24	0.063	0.684	0.24	AMP	complex10.pdb.gz	111,114,115,118

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.