D-I-TASSER P55061-D1

D-I-TASSER results for P55061-D1

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>P55061 (237 residues)
MNIFDRKINFDALLKFSHITPSTQQHLKKVYASFALCMFVAAAGAYVHMVTHFIQAGLLS
ALGSLILMIWLMATPHSHETEQKRLGLLAGFAFLTGVGLGPALEFCIAVNPSILPTAFMG
TAMIFTCFTLSALYARRRSYLFLGGILMSALSLLLLSSLGNVFFGSIWLFQANLYVGLVV
MCGFVLFDTQLIIEKAEHGDQDYIWHCIDLFLDFITVFRKLMMILAMNEKDKKKEKK

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MNIFDRKINFDALLKFSHITPSTQQHLKKVYASFALCMFVAAAGAYVHMVTHFIQAGLLSALGSLILMIWLMATPHSHETEQKRLGLLAGFAFLTGVGLGPALEFCIAVNPSILPTAFMGTAMIFTCFTLSALYARRRSYLFLGGILMSALSLLLLSSLGNVFFGSIWLFQANLYVGLVVMCGFVLFDTQLIIEKAEHGDQDYIWHCIDLFLDFITVFRKLMMILAMNEKDKKKEKK
Prediction	CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCC
Confidence	997888765210223112259999999999999999999999999999999888888999999999999999998765413046999999999999999999999996473999999999999999999999861302254678999999999999999999835279999999999999999999999999987631874699999999999999999999998123674110139
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MNIFDRKINFDALLKFSHITPSTQQHLKKVYASFALCMFVAAAGAYVHMVTHFIQAGLLSALGSLILMIWLMATPHSHETEQKRLGLLAGFAFLTGVGLGPALEFCIAVNPSILPTAFMGTAMIFTCFTLSALYARRRSYLFLGGILMSALSLLLLSSLGNVFFGSIWLFQANLYVGLVVMCGFVLFDTQLIIEKAEHGDQDYIWHCIDLFLDFITVFRKLMMILAMNEKDKKKEKK
Prediction	774233634472234244136303410330312213113312331232132333333333333333333311000212434422300011113312321110001002333310220031001002001200231434212311232232132333323223113333333032111112112000000120243153344200200100310333133320300133565555578
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180                 200                 220

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCC
MNIFDRKINFDALLKFSHITPSTQQHLKKVYASFALCMFVAAAGAYVHMVTHFIQAGLLSALGSLILMIWLMATPHSHETEQKRLGLLAGFAFLTGVGLGPALEFCIAVNPSILPTAFMGTAMIFTCFTLSALYARRRSYLFLGGILMSALSLLLLSSLGNVFFGSIWLFQANLYVGLVVMCGFVLFDTQLIIEKAEHGDQDYIWHCIDLFLDFITVFRKLMMILAMNEKDKKKEKK

4pgrA

0.19

0.15

4.89

1.00

DEthreader

-------------------HESKQSIMQRILTVFVFTLLIATVGLFIGQ-FVPVALML--L---------M---KA--V----GYAFVYTFAFVSGITLFPIVSHYASIAAYVVLEAFGSTFVIFAVLGTIGAKMKKD-LSFLWSFLLVAVLALAVVGIFNFSPLNSAAMMAYSVIGTIVFSLYILYDLNQIKHR-HITEDLIPVMALSLYLDFINLFINLLRFFGILSS-------

4pgrA

0.19

0.16

5.19

2.28

SPARKS-K

-------------------HESKQSIMQRILTVFVFTLLIATVGLFIGQ-FVPVALMLPLSILEVAMIILAFWMRRRKAVGY---AFVYTFAFVSGITLFPIVSHYASIAAYVVLEAFGSTFVIFAVLGTIGAKM-KKDLSFLWSFLLVAVLALAVVGIFNIFSLNSAAMMAYSVIGTIVFSLYILYDLNQIKHR-HITEDLIPVMALSLYLDFINLFINLLRFFGILSS-------

4pgrA

0.19

0.16

5.17

1.16

MapAlign

---------------------EKQSIMQRILTVFVFTLLIATVGLFIGQFVPVALMLSILEVAMIILAFWM-----RRRKA--VYAFVYTFAFVSGITLFPIVSHYASIAGAVVLEAFGSTFVIFAVLGTIGAKMKKD-LSFLWSFLLVAVLALAVVGIFNIFSPLSAAMMAYSVIGTIVFSLYILYDLNQIKHHI--TEDLIPVMALSLYLDFINLFINLLRFFGILSS-------

4pgrA

0.19

0.16

5.19

0.97

CEthreader

-------------------HESKQSIMQRILTVFVFTLLIATVGLFIGQFVP-VALMLPLSILEVAMIILAFWM---RRRKAVGYAFVYTFAFVSGITLFPIVSHYASIAAYVVLEAFGSTFVIFAVLGTIGAKM-KKDLSFLWSFLLVAVLALAVVGIFNIFSLNSAAMMAYSVIGTIVFSLYILYDLNQIKHRHI-TEDLIPVMALSLYLDFINLFINLLRFFGILSS-------

4pgrA

0.19

0.16

5.19

1.61

MUSTER

-------------------HESKQSIMQRILTVFVFTLLIATVGLFIGQFVP-VALMLPLSILEVAMIILAFWM---RRRKAVGYAFVYTFAFVSGITLFPIVSHYASIGAYVVLEAFGSTFVIFAVLGTIGAKM-KKDLSFLWSFLLVAVLALAVVGIFNIFSLNSAAMMAYSVIGTIVFSLYILYDLNQIKHR-HITEDLIPVMALSLYLDFINLFINLLRFFGILSS-------

4pgrA

0.19

0.16

5.19

5.44

HHsearch

-------------------HESKQSIMQRILTVFVFTLLIATVGLFIGQFVPVA-LMLPLSILEVAMIILAFWM---RRRKAVGYAFVYTFAFVSGITLFPIVSHYASAGAYVVLEAFGSTFVIFAVLGTIGAKM-KKDLSFLWSFLLVAVLALAVVGIFNIFSLNSAAMMAYSVIGTIVFSLYILYDLNQIKHR-HITEDLIPVMALSLYLDFINLFINLLRFFGILSS-------

4pgrA

0.19

0.16

5.19

2.48

FFAS-3D

--------------------ESKQSIMQRILTVFVFTLLIATVGLFIGQFVP----VALMLPLSILEVAMIILAFWMRRRKAVGYAFVYTFAFVSGITLFPIVSHYAIAGAYVVLEAFGSTFVIFAVLGTIGAK-MKKDLSFLWSFLLVAVLALAVVGIFNIFSPNSAAMMAYSVIGTIVFSLYILYDLNQIKHR-HITEDLIPVMALSLYLDFINLFINLLRFFGILSS-------

4pgrA

0.14

0.12

4.15

1.18

EigenThreader

-----------------HESKQSIMQRILT--VFVFTLLIATVGLFIGQMLPLSILEVAMIILAFWM-------RRRKAVG--YAFVYTFAFVSGITLFPIVSHYASIAGAYVVLEAFGSTFVIFAVLGTIGAKMKK-DLSFLWSFLLVAVLALAVVGIFNIFSLNSAAMMAYSVIGTIVFSLYILYDLNQIKHRHI-TEDLIPVMALSLYLDFINLFINLLRFFGILSS-------

4pgrA

0.19

0.16

5.17

1.31

CNFpred

---------------------SKQSIMQRILTVFVFTLLIATVGLFIGQFV-----MLPLSILEVAMIILAFWMRRR---KAVGYAFVYTFAFVSGITLFPIVSHYASIAAYVVLEAFGSTFVIFAVLGTIGAKMK-KDLSFLWSFLLVAVLALAVVGIFNIFSPNSAAMMAYSVIGTIVFSLYILYDLNQIKHRHI-TEDLIPVMALSLYLDFINLFINLLRFFGILSS-------

6rw3A

0.11

0.08

3.08

0.83

DEthreader

--------------F-STSFKYVLSACIASFIFGYQVSVLNTIKNFIVVEFECSNNTIQSSFLLASVFIGAVLGFSGYLSIINFFVLLSGFIF-VL-SNSNEL-YKEFLDSHLITILSVVMTAVNFLMTFPAIYIVEKLGRTLLLWGCVGVLVAYLPTAIAN--E-NFVKILSIVATFVMIISFAVSGPVLWIYLHEMKDAS--SL-NW--A---V--S---I--------------

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.7249

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	4pgrA	0.75	2.65	0.182	0.835	model1_4pgrA.pdb.gz
2	6m2lA	0.51	5.00	0.055	0.747	model1_6m2lA.pdb.gz
3	4gbyA	0.51	5.43	0.087	0.789	model1_4gbyA.pdb.gz
4	6h7dA	0.50	5.11	0.056	0.785	model1_6h7dA.pdb.gz
5	4a01A	0.50	5.69	0.086	0.827	model1_4a01A.pdb.gz
6	3j4aA	0.49	5.26	0.038	0.759	model1_3j4aA.pdb.gz
7	4ldsA	0.49	5.00	0.076	0.734	model1_4ldsA.pdb.gz
8	4j05A	0.46	5.84	0.078	0.764	model1_4j05A.pdb.gz
9	4q65A	0.40	6.15	0.054	0.713	model1_4q65A.pdb.gz
10	3wdoA	0.40	5.01	0.052	0.599	model1_3wdoA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0098772	0.74	molecular function regulator
GO:0060698	0.73	endoribonuclease inhibitor activity
GO:0019899	0.63	enzyme binding
GO:0031625	0.62	ubiquitin protein ligase binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0065007	0.87	biological regulation
GO:0050789	0.86	regulation of biological process
GO:0050794	0.82	regulation of cellular process
GO:0044699	0.74	single-organism process
GO:0048523	0.71	negative regulation of cellular process
GO:0010941	0.71	regulation of cell death
GO:0060548	0.70	negative regulation of cell death
GO:0009987	0.67	cellular process
GO:0043067	0.65	regulation of programmed cell death
GO:0048583	0.63	regulation of response to stimulus
GO:0043069	0.63	negative regulation of programmed cell death
GO:0050896	0.62	response to stimulus
GO:0009966	0.62	regulation of signal transduction
GO:0080090	0.57	regulation of primary metabolic process
GO:0060255	0.57	regulation of macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0042981	0.57	regulation of apoptotic process
GO:0043066	0.54	negative regulation of apoptotic process
GO:1902531	0.53	regulation of intracellular signal transduction
GO:0044763	0.52	single-organism cellular process
GO:0042221	0.52	response to chemical
GO:0031323	0.52	regulation of cellular metabolic process
GO:0080134	0.51	regulation of response to stress
GO:0065009	0.51	regulation of molecular function
GO:1901700	0.50	response to oxygen-containing compound
GO:0050790	0.50	regulation of catalytic activity
GO:0044092	0.50	negative regulation of molecular function
GO:0031324	0.50	negative regulation of cellular metabolic process
GO:0010605	0.50	negative regulation of macromolecule metabolic process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	0.98	cell part
GO:0044424	0.93	intracellular part
GO:0044444	0.88	cytoplasmic part
GO:0043226	0.79	organelle
GO:0044446	0.78	intracellular organelle part
GO:0043227	0.78	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0043229	0.75	intracellular organelle
GO:0043231	0.73	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0044425	0.69	membrane part
GO:0016020	0.69	membrane
GO:0031090	0.54	organelle membrane
GO:0044432	0.53	endoplasmic reticulum part
GO:0005783	0.53	endoplasmic reticulum
GO:0005737	0.53	cytoplasm

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	2pocB	0.425	5.19	0.050	0.662	2.6.1.16	NA
2	0.060	2cvpA	0.462	5.22	0.022	0.726	5.3.1.9	NA
3	0.060	1jqoA	0.424	5.38	0.023	0.658	4.1.1.31	NA
4	0.060	2iukA	0.343	6.12	0.063	0.548	1.13.11.12	NA
5	0.060	2pgiA	0.440	5.32	0.055	0.709	5.3.1.9	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.01	2dysC	0.429	4.18	0.049	0.591	0.45	CDL	complex1.pdb.gz	179,182,183,186,190,192
2	0.01	1v55C	0.430	4.17	0.049	0.591	0.55	CDL	complex2.pdb.gz	148,151,152,155,180,183,184,188
3	0.01	2einC	0.438	4.43	0.065	0.599	0.68	CDL	complex3.pdb.gz	177,181,184
4	0.01	3ablC	0.438	4.30	0.050	0.595	0.49	UUU	complex4.pdb.gz	145,149,152,178,182
5	0.01	1hu9A	0.450	4.86	0.036	0.675	0.42	4HM	complex5.pdb.gz	177,180,184,217,219
6	0.01	2h2sB	0.476	5.26	0.061	0.726	0.41	SEK	complex6.pdb.gz	179,180,181
7	0.01	3asoP	0.440	4.31	0.065	0.595	0.54	CDL	complex7.pdb.gz	178,181,182,185,189,214,217
8	0.01	1t10A	0.405	5.66	0.072	0.688	0.41	F6P	complex8.pdb.gz	155,158,179,180

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.