D-I-TASSER P42681-D2

D-I-TASSER results for P42681-D2

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>P42681 (277 residues)
SCLPATAGFSYEKWEIDPSELAFIKEIGSGQFGVVHLGEWRSHIQVAIKAINEGSMSEED
FIEEAKVMMKLSHSKLVQLYGVCIQRKPLYIVTEFMENGCLLNYLRENKGKLRKEMLLSV
CQDICEGMEYLERNGYIHRDLAARNCLVSSTCIVKISDFGMTRYVLDDEYVSSFGAKFPI
KWSPPEVFLFNKYSSKSDVWSFGVLMWEVFTEGKMPFENKSNLQVVEAISEGFRLYRPHL
APMSIYEVMYSCWHEKPEGRPTFAELLRAVTEIAETW

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| SCLPATAGFSYEKWEIDPSELAFIKEIGSGQFGVVHLGEWRSHIQVAIKAINEGSMSEEDFIEEAKVMMKLSHSKLVQLYGVCIQRKPLYIVTEFMENGCLLNYLRENKGKLRKEMLLSVCQDICEGMEYLERNGYIHRDLAARNCLVSSTCIVKISDFGMTRYVLDDEYVSSFGAKFPIKWSPPEVFLFNKYSSKSDVWSFGVLMWEVFTEGKMPFENKSNLQVVEAISEGFRLYRPHLAPMSIYEVMYSCWHEKPEGRPTFAELLRAVTEIAETW
Prediction	CCCCCCCCCCCCCCSCCHHHSSSSSSSCCCCCCSSSSSSSCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCSCSSSSSSCCCCCCSSSSSCCCCCCHHHHHHHCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCHHHHHHSSSCCCCSSSSCCCCCCSSCCCCSSSSCCCCSSSSSCCCHHHHHHCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCHHHCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHC
Confidence	9989988878554223645558988853677966999996698258999738999999999999999974899877129999918995099984799993799998649999999999999999999999998397131121676244699869992677641457772797279625431289888863997624555676778999982599999999999999999719989999999999999999991478556959899999999999719
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| SCLPATAGFSYEKWEIDPSELAFIKEIGSGQFGVVHLGEWRSHIQVAIKAINEGSMSEEDFIEEAKVMMKLSHSKLVQLYGVCIQRKPLYIVTEFMENGCLLNYLRENKGKLRKEMLLSVCQDICEGMEYLERNGYIHRDLAARNCLVSSTCIVKISDFGMTRYVLDDEYVSSFGAKFPIKWSPPEVFLFNKYSSKSDVWSFGVLMWEVFTEGKMPFENKSNLQVVEAISEGFRLYRPHLAPMSIYEVMYSCWHEKPEGRPTFAELLRAVTEIAETW
Prediction	8343445615366110447404035303432203012030566140000003672544630250041046061510010000005641000000006412035104646760425300300200040031027450000000000000247200000001001314575134466130002500000033440113010400100000010204301571425401520573230531750254015003501554175113164025204501765
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180                 200                 220                 240                 260

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCSCCHHHSSSSSSSCCCCCCSSSSSSSCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCSCSSSSSSCCCCCCSSSSSCCCCCCHHHHHHHCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCHHHHHHSSSCCCCSSSSCCCCCCSSCCCCSSSSCCCCSSSSSCCCHHHHHHCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCHHHCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHC
SCLPATAGFSYEKWEIDPSELAFIKEIGSGQFGVVHLGEWRSHIQVAIKAINEGSMSEEDFIEEAKVMMKLSHSKLVQLYGVCIQRKPLYIVTEFMENGCLLNYLRENKGKLRKEMLLSVCQDICEGMEYLERNGYIHRDLAARNCLVSSTCIVKISDFGMTRYVLDDEYVSSFGAKFPIKWSPPEVFLFNKYSSKSDVWSFGVLMWEVFTEGKMPFENKSNLQVVEAISEGFRLYRPHLAPMSIYEVMYSCWHEKPEGRPTFAELLRAVTEIAETW

3bkbA

0.41

0.39

11.59

1.50

DEthreader

---------PKDKWVLNHEDLVLGEQIGRGNFGEVFSGRLRDNTLVAVKSCRELPDLKAKFLQEARILKQYSHPNIVRLIGVCTQKQPIYIVMELVQGGDFLTFLRTEGARLRVKTLLQMVGDAAAGMEYLESKCCIHRDLAARNCLVTEKNVLKISDFGMSREEADGVYAASGLRQVPVKWTAPEALNYGRYSSESDVWSFGILLWETFSLGASPYPNLSNQQTREFVEKGGRLPCPELCPDAVFRLMEQCWAYEPGQRPSFSTIYQELQSIRKRH

3genA

0.60

0.57

16.45

1.82

SPARKS-K

----------YGSWEIDPKDLTFLKELG---FGVVKYGKWRGQYDVAIKMIKEGSMSEDEFIEEAKVMMNLSHEKLVQLYGVCTKQRPIFIITEYMANGCLLNYLREMRHRFQTQQLLEMCKDVCEAMEYLESKQFLHRDLAARNCLVNDQGVVKVSDFGLSRYVLDDEYTSSVGSKFPVRWSPPEVLMYSKFSSKSDIWAFGVLMWEIYSLGKMPYERFTNSETAEHIAQGLRLYRPHLASEKVYTIMYSCWHEKADERPTFKILLSNILDVMDEE

3bkbA

0.41

0.39

11.38

0.42

MapAlign

-------------WVLNHEDLVLGEQIGRGNFGEVFSGRLRANTLVAVKSCRETLDLKAKFLQEARILKQYSHPNIVRLIGVCTQKQPIYIVMELVQGGDFLTFLRTEGARLRVKTLLQMVGDAAAGMEYLESKCCIHRDLAARNCLVTEKNVLKISDFGMSREEADGVYAAGGLRQVPVKWTAPEALNYGRYSSESDVWSFGILLWETFSLGASPYPNLSNQQTREFVEKGGRLPCPELCPDAVFRLMEQCWAYEPGQRPSFSTIYQELQSIRKRH

3bkbA

0.40

11.82

0.30

CEthreader

SGVVLHRAVPKDKWVLNHEDLVLGEQIGRGNFGEVFSGRLRANTLVAVKSCRETLPLKAKFLQEARILKQYSHPNIVRLIGVCTQKQPIYIVMELVQGGDFLTFLRTEGARLRVKTLLQMVGDAAAGMEYLESKCCIHRDLAARNCLVTEKNVLKISDFGMSREEADGVYAASGGLQVPVKWTAPEALNYGRYSSESDVWSFGILLWETFSLGASPYPNLSNQQTREFVEKGGRLPCPELCPDAVFRLMEQCWAYEPGQRPSFSTIYQELQSIRKRH

4xi2A

0.59

16.98

1.65

MUSTER

KNAPSTAGLGYGSWEIDPKDLTFLKELGTGQFGVVKYGKWRGQYDVAIKMIREGSMSEDEFIEEAKVMMNLSHEKLVQLYGVCTKQRPIFIITEYMANGCLLNYLREMRHRFQTQQLLEMCKDVCEAMEYLESKQFLHRDLAARNCLVNDQGVVKVSDFGLSRYVLDDEYTSSVGSKFPVRWSPPEVLMYSKFSSKSDIWAFGVLMWEIYSLGKMPYERFTNSETAEHIAQGLRLYRPHLASERVYTIMYSCWHEKADERPSFKILLSNILDVMDE-

4y93A

0.60

17.18

0.72

HHsearch

LCAPSTAGLGYGSWEIDPKDLTFLKELGTGQFGVVKYGKWRGQYDVAIKMIKEGSMSEDEFIEEAKVMMNLSHEKLVQLYGVCTKQRPIFIITEYMANGCLLNYLREMRHRFQTQQLLEMCKDVCEAMEYLESKQFLHRDLAARNCLVNDQGVVKVSDFGMTRYVLDDEYTSSTGSKFPVKWASPEVLMYSKFSSKSDIWAFGVLMWEIYSLGKMPYERFTNSETAEHIAQGLRLPRPHLASERVYAIMYSCWHEKADERPTFKILLSNILDVMDEE

3genA

0.59

0.56

16.06

3.26

FFAS-3D

----------YGSWEIDPKDL---TFLKELGFGVVKYGKWRGQYDVAIKMIKEGSMSEDEFIEEAKVMMNLSHEKLVQLYGVCTKQRPIFIITEYMANGCLLNYLREMRHRFQTQQLLEMCKDVCEAMEYLESKQFLHRDLAARNCLVNDQGVVKVSDFGLSRYVLDDEYTSSVGSKFPVRWSPPEVLMYSKFSSKSDIWAFGVLMWEIYSLGKMPYERFTNSETAEHIAQGLRLYRPHLASEKVYTIMYSCWHEKADERPTFKILLSNILDVMDE-

3bkbA

0.37

11.04

0.62

EigenThreader

TKKSGVVLHPKDKWVLNHEDLVLGEQIGRGNFGEVFSGRLRADNTLVAVKSCRETLPPDLKAQEARILKQYSHPNIVRLIGVCTQKQPIYIVMELVQGGDFLTFLRTEGARLRVKTLLQMVGDAAAGMEYLESKCCIHRDLAARNCLVTEKNVLKISDFGMSREEA-DGVYAASGGLVPVKWTAPEALNYGRYSSESDVWSFGILLWETFSLGASPYPNLSNQQTREFVEKGGRLPCPELCPDAVFRLMEQCWAYEPGQRPSFSTIYQELQSIRKRH

4ot5A

0.60

0.57

16.45

2.64

CNFpred

--------------EIDPKDLTFLKELGTGQFGVVKYGKWRGQYDVAIKMIKEGSMSEDEFIEEAKVMMNLSHEKLVQLYGVCTKQRPIFIITEYMANGCLLNYLREARHAFQTQQLLEMCKDVCEAMEYLESKQFLHRDLAARNCLVNDQGVVKVSDFGLSRYVLDDEYTSSVGSKFPVRWSPPEVLMYSKFSSKSDIWAFGVLMWEIYSLGKMPYERFTNSETAEHIAQGLRLYRPHLASAAVYTIMYSCWHEKADERPTFKILLSNILDVMDEE

3e62A

0.34

0.33

9.93

1.50

DEthreader

----------RDPTQFEERHLKFLQQLGKGNFGSVEMCRYDTGEVVAVKKLHSTEEHLRDFEREIEILKSLQHDNIVKYKGVCYSRRNLKLIMEYLPYGSLRDYLQKHKERIDHIKLLQYTSQICKGMEYLGTKRYIHRDLATRNILVENENRVKIGDFGLTKVLPQDKEKVKEPGESPIFWYAPESLTESKFSVASDVWSFGVVLYELFTYIKSPPAEMKIVHLIELLKNNGRLPRPDGCPDEIYMIMTECWNNNVNQRPSFRDLALRVDQIRDNM

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.8944

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	3bkbA	0.94	1.21	0.397	0.968	model1_3bkbA.pdb.gz
2	2x2kA	0.92	1.32	0.329	0.960	model1_2x2kA.pdb.gz
3	2fo0A	0.91	2.19	0.402	0.993	model1_2fo0A.pdb.gz
4	3eqrB	0.90	1.34	0.404	0.939	model1_3eqrB.pdb.gz
5	3e62A	0.90	1.96	0.341	0.964	model1_3e62A.pdb.gz
6	1xbcA	0.90	1.32	0.347	0.935	model1_1xbcA.pdb.gz
7	1k9aB	0.90	1.82	0.411	0.950	model1_1k9aB.pdb.gz
8	4y93A	0.89	1.99	0.536	0.950	model1_4y93A.pdb.gz
9	3eyhA	0.89	1.83	0.326	0.950	model1_3eyhA.pdb.gz
10	4xi2A	0.89	2.11	0.542	0.957	model1_4xi2A.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0003824	0.97	catalytic activity
GO:0016740	0.95	transferase activity
GO:0004672	0.94	protein kinase activity
GO:0004674	0.76	protein serine/threonine kinase activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0009987	0.92	cellular process
GO:0008152	0.85	metabolic process
GO:0071704	0.84	organic substance metabolic process
GO:0044237	0.84	cellular metabolic process
GO:0044238	0.83	primary metabolic process
GO:0065007	0.82	biological regulation
GO:0050789	0.81	regulation of biological process
GO:0044260	0.81	cellular macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0050794	0.79	regulation of cellular process
GO:0006796	0.74	phosphate-containing compound metabolic process
GO:0019538	0.73	protein metabolic process
GO:0006464	0.72	cellular protein modification process
GO:0006468	0.71	protein phosphorylation
GO:0007165	0.63	signal transduction
GO:0044699	0.55	single-organism process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	1.00	cell part
GO:0044424	0.91	intracellular part
GO:0043226	0.61	organelle
GO:0043229	0.60	intracellular organelle
GO:0043227	0.58	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0043231	0.57	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0005634	0.50	nucleus

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.430	3brbB	0.830	2.00	0.373	0.895	2.7.10.1	140,142,144,145
2	0.382	3lm0A	0.831	2.33	0.211	0.913	2.7.11.1	140,147,161
3	0.216	1sm2A	0.854	1.23	0.629	0.884	2.7.10.2	NA
4	0.215	3e62A	0.906	1.83	0.341	0.964	2.7.10.2	NA
5	0.214	1k2pA	0.876	1.75	0.601	0.931	2.7.10.2	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.71	3bkbA	0.944	1.21	0.397	0.968	1.51	STU	complex1.pdb.gz	27,28,29,35,47,49,93,94,95,96,99,144,147,157,158
2	0.70	1iepA	0.852	2.09	0.417	0.917	1.33	STI	complex2.pdb.gz	27,35,47,49,64,67,68,77,91,93,95,96,99,137,138,139,147,157,158
3	0.56	2g2fB	0.896	1.37	0.425	0.935	1.46	ATG	complex3.pdb.gz	27,35,47,94,95,96,99,100,144
4	0.53	3dk6B	0.874	1.31	0.437	0.910	1.12	SX7	complex4.pdb.gz	47,93,94,95,96,100,147,159
5	0.43	3qrkA	0.823	2.44	0.423	0.906	1.32	9DP	complex5.pdb.gz	47,48,49,60,64,68,71,77,91,93,138,157,158
6	0.26	2g1tA	0.871	1.97	0.431	0.931	1.30	III	complex6.pdb.gz	31,144,178,179,180,188,189,222,226
7	0.08	2ivs0	0.931	1.45	0.354	0.968	1.38	III	complex7.pdb.gz	51,55,56,57,88,89,175,176,177,178,179,180,182,183,189,222,223,226
8	0.08	3ms9A	0.839	2.05	0.424	0.899	0.88	MS9	complex8.pdb.gz	113,117,118,206,209,210,245

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.