D-I-TASSER P40818

D-I-TASSER results for P40818

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: P40818
Protein Name: Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 8
Gene Name: USP8

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>P40818 (1118 residues)
MPAVASVPKELYLSSSLKDLNKKTEVKPEKISTKSYVHSALKIFKTAEECRLDRDEERAY
VLYMKYVTVYNLIKKRPDFKQQQDYFHSILGPGNIKKAVEEAERLSESLKLRYEEAEVRK
KLEEKDRQEEAQRLQQKRQETGREDGGTLAKGSLENVLDSKDKTQKSNGEKNEKCETKEK
GAITAKELYTMMTDKNISLIIMDARRMQDYQDSCILHSLSVPEEAISPGVTASWIEAHLP
DDSKDTWKKRGNVEYVVLLDWFSSAKDLQIGTTLRSLKDALFKWESKTVLRNEPLVLEGG
YENWLLCYPQYTTNAKVTPPPRRQNEEVSISLDFTYPSLEESIPSKPAAQTPPASIEVDE
NIELISGQNERMGPLNISTPVEPVAASKSDVSPIIQPVPSIKNVPQIDRTKKPAVKLPEE
HRIKSESTNHEQQSPQSGKVIPDRSTKPVVFSPTLMLTDEEKARIHAETALLMEKNKQEK
ELRERQQEEQKEKLRKEEQEQKAKKKQEAEENEITEKQQKAKEEMEKKESEQAKKEDKET
SAKRGKEITGVKRQSKSEHETSDAKKSVEDRGKRCPTPEIQKKSTGDVPHTSVTGDSGSG
KPFKIKGQPESGILRTGTFREDTDDTERNKAQREPLTRARSEEMGRIVPGLPSGWAKFLD
PITGTFRYYHSPTNTVHMYPPEMAPSSAPPSTPPTHKAKPQIPAERDREPSKLKRSYSSP
DITQAIQEEEKRKPTVTPTVNRENKPTCYPKAEISRLSASQIRNLNPVFGGSGPALTGLR
NLGNTCYMNSILQCLCNAPHLADYFNRNCYQDDINRSNLLGHKGEVAEEFGIIMKALWTG
QYRYISPKDFKITIGKINDQFAGYSQQDSQELLLFLMDGLHEDLNKADNRKRYKEENNDH
LDDFKAAEHAWQKHKQLNESIIVALFQGQFKSTVQCLTCHKKSRTFEAFMYLSLPLASTS
KCTLQDCLRLFSKEEKLTDNNRFYCSHCRARRDSLKKIEIWKLPPVLLVHLKRFSYDGRW
KQKLQTSVDFPLENLDLSQYVIGPKNNLKKYNLFSVSNHYGGLDGGHYTAYCKNAARQRW
FKFDDHEVSDISVSSVKSSAAYILFYTSLGPRVTDVAT

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	P40818-D1	1-1118	1118		MPAVASVPKELYLSSSLKDLNKKTEVKPEKISTKSYVHSALKIFKTAEECRLDRDEERAYVLYMKYVTVYNLIKKRPDFKQQQDYFHSILGPGNIKKAVEEAERLSESLKLRYEEAEVRKKLEEKDRQEEAQRLQQKRQETGREDGGTLAKGSLENVLDSKDKTQKSNGEKNEKCETKEKGAITAKELYTMMTDKNISLIIMDARRMQDYQDSCILHSLSVPEEAISPGVTASWIEAHLPDDSKDTWKKRGNVEYVVLLDWFSSAKDLQIGTTLRSLKDALFKWESKTVLRNEPLVLEGGYENWLLCYPQYTTNAKVTPPPRRQNEEVSISLDFTYPSLEESIPSKPAAQTPPASIEVDENIELISGQNERMGPLNISTPVEPVAASKSDVSPIIQPVPSIKNVPQIDRTKKPAVKLPEEHRIKSESTNHEQQSPQSGKVIPDRSTKPVVFSPTLMLTDEEKARIHAETALLMEKNKQEKELRERQQEEQKEKLRKEEQEQKAKKKQEAEENEITEKQQKAKEEMEKKESEQAKKEDKETSAKRGKEITGVKRQSKSEHETSDAKKSVEDRGKRCPTPEIQKKSTGDVPHTSVTGDSGSGKPFKIKGQPESGILRTGTFREDTDDTERNKAQREPLTRARSEEMGRIVPGLPSGWAKFLDPITGTFRYYHSPTNTVHMYPPEMAPSSAPPSTPPTHKAKPQIPAERDREPSKLKRSYSSPDITQAIQEEEKRKPTVTPTVNRENKPTCYPKAEISRLSASQIRNLNPVFGGSGPALTGLRNLGNTCYMNSILQCLCNAPHLADYFNRNCYQDDINRSNLLGHKGEVAEEFGIIMKALWTGQYRYISPKDFKITIGKINDQFAGYSQQDSQELLLFLMDGLHEDLNKADNRKRYKEENNDHLDDFKAAEHAWQKHKQLNESIIVALFQGQFKSTVQCLTCHKKSRTFEAFMYLSLPLASTSKCTLQDCLRLFSKEEKLTDNNRFYCSHCRARRDSLKKIEIWKLPPVLLVHLKRFSYDGRWKQKLQTSVDFPLENLDLSQYVIGPKNNLKKYNLFSVSNHYGGLDGGHYTAYCKNAARQRWFKFDDHEVSDISVSSVKSSAAYILFYTSLGPRVTDVAT

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.5918

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	7alpU	0.27	9.97	0.027	0.447	model1_7alpU.pdb.gz
2	6vr4A	0.27	9.13	0.039	0.415	model1_6vr4A.pdb.gz
3	6eqoA	0.26	9.70	0.034	0.426	model1_6eqoA.pdb.gz
4	5d06A	0.26	9.69	0.033	0.419	model1_5d06A.pdb.gz
5	7cpxA	0.26	9.61	0.041	0.419	model1_7cpxA.pdb.gz
6	5a22A	0.26	9.74	0.043	0.422	model1_5a22A.pdb.gz
7	6ar6A	0.26	9.21	0.063	0.398	model1_6ar6A.pdb.gz
8	4bedB	0.25	9.44	0.032	0.400	model1_4bedB.pdb.gz
9	6r9tA	0.25	9.56	0.019	0.397	model1_6r9tA.pdb.gz
10	6uebA	0.25	9.68	0.052	0.399	model1_6uebA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0003824	0.96	catalytic activity
GO:0070011	0.95	peptidase activity, acting on L-amino acid peptides
GO:0008234	0.94	cysteine-type peptidase activity
GO:0019783	0.92	ubiquitin-like protein-specific protease activity
GO:0036459	0.91	thiol-dependent ubiquitinyl hydrolase activity
GO:0004843	0.90	thiol-dependent ubiquitin-specific protease activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0009987	0.98	cellular process
GO:0044238	0.88	primary metabolic process
GO:0044237	0.88	cellular metabolic process
GO:0043170	0.88	macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0044260	0.87	cellular macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0019538	0.83	protein metabolic process
GO:0006508	0.81	proteolysis
GO:0044267	0.76	cellular protein metabolic process
GO:0006464	0.75	cellular protein modification process
GO:0070647	0.74	protein modification by small protein conjugation or removal
GO:0070646	0.73	protein modification by small protein removal
GO:0016579	0.72	protein deubiquitination
GO:0065007	0.71	biological regulation
GO:0050794	0.70	regulation of cellular process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	1.00	intracellular part
GO:0043226	0.71	organelle
GO:0043229	0.70	intracellular organelle
GO:0043227	0.68	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0043231	0.66	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0044444	0.65	cytoplasmic part
GO:0044422	0.61	organelle part
GO:0044446	0.60	intracellular organelle part
GO:0005634	0.50	nucleus

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	2hg4C	0.211	8.89	0.040	0.318	2.3.1.94	NA
2	0.060	3b9jJ	0.104	6.70	0.031	0.136	1.17.1.4 1.17.3.2	781,862
3	0.060	1kc7A	0.209	8.94	0.026	0.318	2.7.9.1	NA
4	0.060	2ibiA	0.212	5.45	0.269	0.254	3.4.19.12	1014
5	0.060	1pj6A	0.210	8.42	0.027	0.306	1.5.3.10	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.01	2vdcA	0.241	8.87	0.018	0.361	0.16	FMN	complex1.pdb.gz	774,775,776,1062,1097,1098
2	0.01	3cmvB	0.200	9.26	0.028	0.312	0.19	ANP	complex2.pdb.gz	770,771,773,774,776,838
3	0.01	2qkiA	0.164	8.38	0.049	0.242	0.11	III	complex3.pdb.gz	779,781,782,783,855,856
4	0.01	2qkiD	0.161	8.66	0.030	0.242	0.13	III	complex4.pdb.gz	854,856,859,863,865,866
5	0.01	1lm1A	0.243	8.87	0.024	0.364	0.11	FMN	complex5.pdb.gz	774,775,837,1066,1090,1096
6	0.01	3buiA	0.230	8.65	0.043	0.344	0.13	TRS	complex6.pdb.gz	780,783,1013
7	0.01	1llzA	0.242	9.04	0.030	0.366	0.15	FMN	complex7.pdb.gz	844,1061,1062,1084
8	0.01	1llwA	0.242	8.95	0.027	0.365	0.13	FMN	complex8.pdb.gz	773,778,852,853
9	0.01	1ea0B	0.239	8.87	0.033	0.357	0.22	OMT	complex9.pdb.gz	779,780,781
10	0.01	3cmtD	0.231	9.43	0.039	0.361	0.13	ALF	complex10.pdb.gz	778,779,782

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.