D-I-TASSER P23759-D2

D-I-TASSER results for P23759-D2

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>P23759 (125 residues)
VSHGCVSKILCRYQETGSIRPGAIGGSKPRQVATPDVEKKIEEYKRENPGMFSWEIRDRL
LKDGHCDRSTVPSGLVSSISRVLRIKFGKKEEEDEADKKEDDGEKKAKHSIDGILGDKGN
RLDEG

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 \| \| \| \| \| \| VSHGCVSKILCRYQETGSIRPGAIGGSKPRQVATPDVEKKIEEYKRENPGMFSWEIRDRLLKDGHCDRSTVPSGLVSSISRVLRIKFGKKEEEDEADKKEDDGEKKAKHSIDGILGDKGNRLDEG
Prediction	CCCCHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
Confidence	98414899987430246646886678888777888999999999983998667999999998378887779976412788987403455556676654445677788977352347999887789
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 \| \| \| \| \| \| VSHGCVSKILCRYQETGSIRPGAIGGSKPRQVATPDVEKKIEEYKRENPGMFSWEIRDRLLKDGHCDRSTVPSGLVSSISRVLRIKFGKKEEEDEADKKEDDGEKKAKHSIDGILGDKGNRLDEG
Prediction	76421112013333753414254344465553434502520450166354233440254127641156651336415303420445354566656555556576563512021011555565668
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
VSHGCVSKILCRYQETGSIRPGAIGGSKPRQVATPDVEKKIEEYKRENPGMFSWEIRDRLLKDGHCDRSTVPSGLVSSISRVLRIKFGKKEEEDEADKKEDDGEKKAKHSIDGILGDKGNRLDEG

2k27A

0.58

0.50

14.25

1.01

MUSTER

VSHGCVSKILGRYYETGSIRPGVIGGSKPKVA-TPKVVEKIGDYKRQNPTMFAWEIRDRLLAEGVCDNDTVPS--VSSINRIIRTKVQQPFNLPMDSGAPGGGSHHHHHH---------------

2k27A

0.60

0.51

14.68

1.46

HHsearch

VSHGCVSKILGRYYETGSIRPGVIGGSKPK-VATPKVVEKIGDYKRQNPTMFAWEIRDRLLAEGVCDNDTVPS--VSSINRIIRTKVQQPFNLPMDSGAPGGGSHHHHHH---------------

1mdmA

0.67

0.45

12.76

1.07

FFAS-3D

VSHGCVSKILGRYYETGSIKPGVIGGS-KPKVATPKVVEKIAEYKRQNPTMFAWEIRDRLLAERVCDNDT--VPSVSSINRIIRTK---------------------------------------

3psfA2

0.05

0.04

1.88

0.83

DEthreader

-----ER-YQELRA--GI---------EKISKLFKEAIGNAIKFITKEN-LEVPFIYYRRN-YISSRKDGFL-LTEDDLWDIVSLDIEFH--VAKTVRHKFMTKLD-Q-APFMHSPLEA-VLVEE

1mdmA

0.73

0.49

13.84

0.92

SPARKS-K

VSHGCVSKILGRYYETGSIKPGVIGGSKPK-VATPKVVEKIAEYKRQNPTMFAWEIRDRLLAERVCDNDTVPS--VSSINRIIRTK---------------------------------------

4zemA1

0.09

0.08

3.02

0.97

MapAlign

QSLEASIESLIFLLKRRQV--------TGDECA-GAIAQLLRQVVAKSDQL-LYRVQTAGAR--LARAAPHEPVIGNIVRRVLGLIR-----DEASDIASDAASDIQSKSMFNLLSVQPFSVHAL

1mdmA

0.73

0.49

13.84

0.62

CEthreader

VSHGCVSKILGRYYETGSIKPGVIGGSKPK-VATPKVVEKIAEYKRQNPTMFAWEIRDRLLAERVCDNDTVPS--VSSINRIIRTK---------------------------------------

1mdmA

0.72

0.48

13.62

0.94

MUSTER

VSHGCVSKILGRYYETGSIKPGVIGGSKPKV-ATPKVVEKIAEYKRQNPTMFAWEIRDRLLAERVCDNDTVPS--VSSINRIIRTK---------------------------------------

1pdnC

0.76

0.49

13.82

1.41

HHsearch

VSHGCVSKILNRYQETGSIRPGVIGGSKPR-IATPEIENRIEEYKRSSPGMFSWEIREKLIREGVCDRSTAPS--VSAISRLV------------------------------------------

1pdnC

0.69

0.44

12.52

0.99

FFAS-3D

VSHGCVSKILNRYQETGSIRPGV-IGGSKPRIATPEIENRIEEYKRSSPGMFSWEIREKLIREGVCDRSTAPS--VSAISRLV------------------------------------------

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.5509

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	2ixpB	0.50	4.34	0.090	0.832	model1_2ixpB.pdb.gz
2	5livA	0.50	4.32	0.052	0.824	model1_5livA.pdb.gz
3	3awmA	0.49	4.17	0.061	0.776	model1_3awmA.pdb.gz
4	3e6iA	0.49	4.46	0.050	0.808	model1_3e6iA.pdb.gz
5	1ddbA	0.49	4.03	0.054	0.784	model1_1ddbA.pdb.gz
6	3psfA2	0.48	4.49	0.099	0.824	model1_3psfA2.pdb.gz
7	2hi4A	0.47	4.60	0.041	0.808	model1_2hi4A.pdb.gz
8	2hv7A	0.47	4.51	0.036	0.816	model1_2hv7A.pdb.gz
9	2pg6A	0.45	4.81	0.096	0.816	model1_2pg6A.pdb.gz
10	1zo4B	0.43	4.45	0.053	0.760	model1_1zo4B.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:1901363	0.81	heterocyclic compound binding
GO:0097159	0.81	organic cyclic compound binding
GO:0003676	0.80	nucleic acid binding
GO:0003677	0.79	DNA binding
GO:0003700	0.75	transcription factor activity, sequence-specific DNA binding
GO:0043565	0.64	sequence-specific DNA binding
GO:0044212	0.56	transcription regulatory region DNA binding
GO:0003690	0.50	double-stranded DNA binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044699	0.92	single-organism process
GO:0032502	0.84	developmental process
GO:0048856	0.79	anatomical structure development
GO:0065007	0.74	biological regulation
GO:0050789	0.72	regulation of biological process
GO:0044767	0.72	single-organism developmental process
GO:0009987	0.71	cellular process
GO:0050794	0.70	regulation of cellular process
GO:0080090	0.61	regulation of primary metabolic process
GO:0031323	0.61	regulation of cellular metabolic process
GO:0060255	0.60	regulation of macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0044763	0.59	single-organism cellular process
GO:2001141	0.58	regulation of RNA biosynthetic process
GO:0006355	0.57	regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
GO:0048518	0.55	positive regulation of biological process
GO:0048522	0.54	positive regulation of cellular process
GO:0048513	0.53	animal organ development
GO:0048869	0.51	cellular developmental process
GO:0009893	0.51	positive regulation of metabolic process
GO:0031325	0.50	positive regulation of cellular metabolic process
GO:0010604	0.50	positive regulation of macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0009653	0.50	anatomical structure morphogenesis

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044446	1.00	intracellular organelle part
GO:0043231	1.00	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0005634	0.86	nucleus

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	2z3uA	0.433	4.74	0.044	0.816	1.-.-.-	NA
2	0.060	1hp4A	0.444	4.89	0.057	0.816	3.2.1.52	NA
3	0.060	3hhsB	0.466	4.71	0.054	0.840	1.14.18.1	NA
4	0.060	2wm4A	0.442	4.59	0.042	0.768	1.14.-.-	NA
5	0.060	3i3kA	0.380	4.27	0.060	0.648	1.14.13.70	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.05	2rocA	0.451	4.21	0.075	0.720	0.21	III	complex1.pdb.gz	13,24,28,31,75,78
2	0.04	2d0wA	0.469	4.03	0.097	0.744	0.35	HEM	complex2.pdb.gz	4,5,8,9,18,20,25,28,79
3	0.01	2hv7B	0.471	4.50	0.045	0.816	0.18	ADP	complex3.pdb.gz	22,23,24
4	0.01	1ue8A	0.455	4.71	0.033	0.792	0.10	HEM	complex4.pdb.gz	5,6,9,10,21,22,75,76
5	0.01	3t3zB	0.456	4.68	0.052	0.808	0.10	UUU	complex5.pdb.gz	20,25,84,85,88,91
6	0.01	2ixpD	0.486	4.42	0.071	0.832	0.30	III	complex6.pdb.gz	4,5,8,9,22,23
7	0.01	3kj0A	0.440	4.26	0.047	0.720	0.20	III	complex7.pdb.gz	5,9,23
8	0.01	2gc7L	0.477	3.81	0.055	0.728	0.33	HEM	complex8.pdb.gz	5,8,9,17,18,20,26
9	0.01	1mg2D	0.476	3.98	0.043	0.744	0.29	HEM	complex9.pdb.gz	6,11,12,25,28
10	0.01	2nlaA	0.441	4.27	0.048	0.728	0.20	III	complex10.pdb.gz	29,66,67,74,76,77

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.