D-I-TASSER P20719

D-I-TASSER results for P20719

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: P20719
Protein Name: Homeobox protein Hox-A5
Gene Name: HOXA5

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>P20719 (270 residues)
MSSYFVNSFCGRYPNGPDYQLHNYGDHSSVSEQFRDSASMHSGRYGYGYNGMDLSVGRSG
SGHFGSGERARSYAASASAAPAEPRYSQPATSTHSPQPDPLPCSAVAPSPGSDSHHGGKN
SLSNSSGASADAGSTHISSREGVGTASGAEEDAPASSEQASAQSEPSPAPPAQPQIYPWM
RKLHISHDNIGGPEGKRARTAYTRYQTLELEKEFHFNRYLTRRRRIEIAHALCLSERQIK
IWFQNRRMKWKKDNKLKSMSMAAAGGAFRP

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	P20719-D1	1-270	270		MSSYFVNSFCGRYPNGPDYQLHNYGDHSSVSEQFRDSASMHSGRYGYGYNGMDLSVGRSGSGHFGSGERARSYAASASAAPAEPRYSQPATSTHSPQPDPLPCSAVAPSPGSDSHHGGKNSLSNSSGASADAGSTHISSREGVGTASGAEEDAPASSEQASAQSEPSPAPPAQPQIYPWMRKLHISHDNIGGPEGKRARTAYTRYQTLELEKEFHFNRYLTRRRRIEIAHALCLSERQIKIWFQNRRMKWKKDNKLKSMSMAAAGGAFRP

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

SpinHigh qualityWhite background

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.4247

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

SpinHigh qualityWhite background

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	3eh2A	0.45	6.41	0.047	0.793	model1_3eh2A.pdb.gz
2	1bxrA	0.44	6.09	0.035	0.744	model1_1bxrA.pdb.gz
3	5xf9A	0.44	5.87	0.016	0.733	model1_5xf9A.pdb.gz
4	4aahA	0.44	6.33	0.041	0.778	model1_4aahA.pdb.gz
5	4maeA	0.44	6.26	0.048	0.767	model1_4maeA.pdb.gz
6	6mvgA	0.44	5.63	0.026	0.696	model1_6mvgA.pdb.gz
7	2d0vA	0.44	6.66	0.037	0.781	model1_2d0vA.pdb.gz
8	3cmgA	0.44	5.55	0.052	0.685	model1_3cmgA.pdb.gz
9	6rc9A1	0.44	6.63	0.054	0.789	model1_6rc9A1.pdb.gz
10	6vkzA	0.44	5.41	0.035	0.663	model1_6vkzA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:1901363	0.79	heterocyclic compound binding
GO:0097159	0.79	organic cyclic compound binding
GO:0003676	0.78	nucleic acid binding
GO:0003677	0.76	DNA binding
GO:0003700	0.75	transcription factor activity, sequence-specific DNA binding
GO:0043565	0.62	sequence-specific DNA binding
GO:0044212	0.57	transcription regulatory region DNA binding
GO:0003690	0.52	double-stranded DNA binding
GO:0000976	0.51	transcription regulatory region sequence-specific DNA binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044699	0.85	single-organism process
GO:0065007	0.83	biological regulation
GO:0050789	0.82	regulation of biological process
GO:0032502	0.81	developmental process
GO:0050794	0.79	regulation of cellular process
GO:0044767	0.71	single-organism developmental process
GO:0019222	0.71	regulation of metabolic process
GO:0080090	0.70	regulation of primary metabolic process
GO:0060255	0.70	regulation of macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0031323	0.70	regulation of cellular metabolic process
GO:0010468	0.69	regulation of gene expression
GO:0009987	0.69	cellular process
GO:0006355	0.67	regulation of transcription, DNA-templated
GO:0048856	0.62	anatomical structure development
GO:0044763	0.54	single-organism cellular process
GO:0006357	0.53	regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	1.00	intracellular part
GO:0043229	0.92	intracellular organelle
GO:0043227	0.92	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0005634	0.91	nucleus

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

SpinHigh qualityWhite background

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	3ilvA	0.399	6.52	0.096	0.726	6.3.5.1	187
2	0.060	2d4wA	0.400	6.62	0.029	0.722	2.7.1.30	NA
3	0.060	3flcX	0.422	6.55	0.047	0.756	2.7.1.30	NA
4	0.060	1kb0A	0.398	6.17	0.032	0.704	1.1.99.-	26
5	0.060	1xc6A	0.340	6.69	0.042	0.622	3.2.1.23	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

/jmol//j2s/core/package.js

-- required by ClazzNode ajax=false async=true

/jmol//j2s/core/core.z.js

-- required by ClazzNode ajax=false async=true

JSmol exec jmolApplet0 start applet null

Jmol JavaScript applet jmolApplet0__534321926059874__ initializing

Jmol getValue debug null

Jmol getValue logLevel null

Jmol getValue allowjavascript null

AppletRegistry.checkIn(jmolApplet0__534321926059874__)

vwrOptions:

{ "name":"jmolApplet0","applet":true,"documentBase":"https://zhanglab.comp.nus.edu.sg/HPmod/data/P20719/","platform":"J.awtjs2d.Platform","fullName":"jmolApplet0__534321926059874__","codePath":"https:/jmol//j2s/","display":"jmolApplet0_canvas2d","signedApplet":"true","appletReadyCallback":"Jmol._readyCallback","statusListener":"[J.appletjs.Jmol object]","syncId":"534321926059874","bgcolor":"#000000" }

setting document base to "https://zhanglab.comp.nus.edu.sg/HPmod/data/P20719/"

Jmol Version: 14.2.13_2015.03.07 2015-03-07 10:45

java.vendor: Java2Script (HTML5)

java.version: 2015-03-01 07:13:29 (JSmol/j2s)

os.name: Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)

Access: ALL

memory: 0.0/0.0

processors available: 1

useCommandThread: false

appletId:jmolApplet0 (signed)

/jmol//j2s/core/corescript.z.js

-- required by ClazzNode ajax=true async=false

Jmol getValue emulate null

defaults = "Jmol"

Jmol getValue boxbgcolor null

Jmol getValue bgcolor #000000

backgroundColor = "#000000"

Jmol getValue ANIMFRAMECallback null

Jmol getValue APPLETREADYCallback Jmol._readyCallback

APPLETREADYCallback = "Jmol._readyCallback"

callback set for APPLETREADYCallback Jmol._readyCallback APPLETREADY

Jmol getValue ATOMMOVEDCallback null

Jmol getValue CLICKCallback null

Jmol getValue DRAGDROPCallback null

Jmol getValue ECHOCallback null

Jmol getValue ERRORCallback null

Jmol getValue EVALCallback null

Jmol getValue HOVERCallback null

Jmol getValue IMAGECallback null

Jmol getValue LOADSTRUCTCallback null

Jmol getValue MEASURECallback null

Jmol getValue MESSAGECallback null

Jmol getValue MINIMIZATIONCallback null

Jmol getValue SERVICECallback null

Jmol getValue PICKCallback null

Jmol getValue RESIZECallback null

Jmol getValue SCRIPTCallback null

Jmol getValue SYNCCallback null

Jmol getValue STRUCTUREMODIFIEDCallback null

Jmol getValue doTranslate null

language=en_US

Jmol getValue popupMenu null

Jmol getValue script null

Jmol getValue loadInline null

Jmol getValue load null

Jmol applet jmolApplet0__534321926059874__ ready

SpinHigh qualityWhite background

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.01	1jdbH	0.425	5.97	0.050	0.704	0.35	GLN	complex1.pdb.gz	176,248,249
2	0.01	1a9x0	0.411	6.37	0.054	0.711	0.21	III	complex2.pdb.gz	189,190,197,198,199
3	0.01	1ce8G	0.426	6.03	0.062	0.719	0.11	IMP	complex3.pdb.gz	192,196,248
4	0.01	1a9x1	0.411	6.37	0.054	0.711	0.29	III	complex4.pdb.gz	190,193,194,195
5	0.01	1a9xA	0.411	6.37	0.054	0.711	0.13	PO4	complex5.pdb.gz	192,194,197
6	0.01	1a9x3	0.426	5.86	0.063	0.700	0.19	III	complex6.pdb.gz	189,192,195,196,197,198,201
7	0.01	1jdbB	0.410	6.41	0.050	0.715	0.15	GLN	complex7.pdb.gz	196,238,244,245

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.