D-I-TASSER P0DMW2

D-I-TASSER results for P0DMW2

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: P0DMW2
Protein Name: NLR family pyrin domain-containing protein 2B
Gene Name: NLRP2B

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>P0DMW2 (45 residues)
MVSSAQLDFNLQALLGQLSQDDLCKFKSLIRTVSLGNELQKIPQT

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	P0DMW2-D1	1-45	45		MVSSAQLDFNLQALLGQLSQDDLCKFKSLIRTVSLGNELQKIPQT

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.5828

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	5hygA	0.70	2.30	0.044	0.933	model1_5hygA.pdb.gz
2	6h3wA	0.69	2.72	0.111	0.956	model1_6h3wA.pdb.gz
3	1di1A	0.68	2.24	0.200	0.956	model1_1di1A.pdb.gz
4	1oquC	0.66	2.40	0.156	0.933	model1_1oquC.pdb.gz
5	5wtjA	0.66	2.15	0.089	0.933	model1_5wtjA.pdb.gz
6	4bmoA	0.66	2.20	0.133	0.911	model1_4bmoA.pdb.gz
7	6gp2A	0.66	2.49	0.178	0.933	model1_6gp2A.pdb.gz
8	1uzrB	0.66	2.07	0.133	0.911	model1_1uzrB.pdb.gz
9	2jcdA	0.63	2.66	0.044	0.978	model1_2jcdA.pdb.gz
10	4n83A	0.62	2.37	0.156	0.911	model1_4n83A.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0032090	0.51	Pyrin domain binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0080090	1.00	regulation of primary metabolic process
GO:0065009	1.00	regulation of molecular function
GO:0060255	1.00	regulation of macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0050706	1.00	regulation of interleukin-1 beta secretion
GO:0031323	1.00	regulation of cellular metabolic process
GO:1900226	0.71	negative regulation of NLRP3 inflammasome complex assembly
GO:0050713	0.71	negative regulation of interleukin-1 beta secretion
GO:0032088	0.71	negative regulation of NF-kappaB transcription factor activity
GO:0031347	0.71	regulation of defense response
GO:0010804	0.71	negative regulation of tumor necrosis factor-mediated signaling pathway
GO:0043065	0.68	positive regulation of apoptotic process
GO:0032268	0.68	regulation of cellular protein metabolic process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0043231	1.00	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0005737	1.00	cytoplasm
GO:0005634	0.55	nucleus

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	2vz9B	0.593	2.36	0.070	0.933	2.3.1.85	NA
2	0.060	1m7sD	0.607	2.34	0.070	0.933	1.11.1.6	NA
3	0.060	1e93A	0.603	2.64	0.140	0.933	1.11.1.6	NA
4	0.060	2oa6D	0.614	2.65	0.178	0.956	4.2.3.9	NA
5	0.060	1cf9A	0.642	2.45	0.093	0.933	1.11.1.6	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

No Binding sites was predicted

Click to view	Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.