D-I-TASSER P0CF74

D-I-TASSER results for P0CF74

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: P0CF74
Protein Name: Immunoglobulin lambda constant 6
Gene Name: IGLC6

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>P0CF74 (106 residues)
GQPKAAPSVTLFPPSSEELQANKATLVCLISDFYPGAVKVAWKADGSPVNTGVETTTPSK
QSNNKYAASSYLSLTPEQWKSHRSYSCQVTHEGSTVEKTVAPAECS

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	P0CF74-D1	1-106	106		GQPKAAPSVTLFPPSSEELQANKATLVCLISDFYPGAVKVAWKADGSPVNTGVETTTPSKQSNNKYAASSYLSLTPEQWKSHRSYSCQVTHEGSTVEKTVAPAECS

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.8843

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	1a8jL2	0.94	1.28	0.934	1.000	model1_1a8jL2.pdb.gz
2	5ocyL	0.94	1.12	0.721	0.981	model1_5ocyL.pdb.gz
3	6qn7L	0.94	1.18	0.752	0.991	model1_6qn7L.pdb.gz
4	1nc4C	0.93	1.52	0.736	0.991	model1_1nc4C.pdb.gz
5	6mtsL	0.93	0.82	0.942	0.972	model1_6mtsL.pdb.gz
6	2rcjT	0.93	1.42	0.915	0.991	model1_2rcjT.pdb.gz
7	7cr5L	0.93	0.74	0.961	0.962	model1_7cr5L.pdb.gz
8	7jkbA	0.93	0.83	0.942	0.972	model1_7jkbA.pdb.gz
9	3to4D	0.93	1.22	0.333	0.991	model1_3to4D.pdb.gz
10	4ynyB	0.93	0.63	0.673	0.953	model1_4ynyB.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0003823	0.87	antigen binding
GO:0005102	0.68	receptor binding
GO:0034987	0.63	immunoglobulin receptor binding
GO:0022857	0.51	transmembrane transporter activity
GO:0015269	0.50	calcium-activated potassium channel activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0002376	0.96	immune system process
GO:0065007	0.84	biological regulation
GO:0050789	0.84	regulation of biological process
GO:0050896	0.82	response to stimulus
GO:0050794	0.81	regulation of cellular process
GO:0048518	0.81	positive regulation of biological process
GO:0048522	0.79	positive regulation of cellular process
GO:0006955	0.78	immune response
GO:0002682	0.77	regulation of immune system process
GO:0009987	0.74	cellular process
GO:0016043	0.72	cellular component organization
GO:0002694	0.72	regulation of leukocyte activation
GO:0002684	0.72	positive regulation of immune system process
GO:0051249	0.69	regulation of lymphocyte activation
GO:0048584	0.69	positive regulation of response to stimulus
GO:0002696	0.69	positive regulation of leukocyte activation
GO:0050778	0.67	positive regulation of immune response
GO:0051251	0.66	positive regulation of lymphocyte activation
GO:0006959	0.64	humoral immune response
GO:0006952	0.64	defense response
GO:0002253	0.64	activation of immune response
GO:0002252	0.64	immune effector process
GO:0043207	0.63	response to external biotic stimulus
GO:0007166	0.63	cell surface receptor signaling pathway
GO:0051707	0.62	response to other organism
GO:0050851	0.62	antigen receptor-mediated signaling pathway
GO:0009617	0.61	response to bacterium
GO:0045087	0.59	innate immune response
GO:0044699	0.58	single-organism process
GO:0042742	0.58	defense response to bacterium
GO:0008037	0.57	cell recognition
GO:0006958	0.57	complement activation, classical pathway
GO:0050871	0.56	positive regulation of B cell activation
GO:0050853	0.56	B cell receptor signaling pathway
GO:0006911	0.56	phagocytosis, engulfment
GO:0006910	0.56	phagocytosis, recognition

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	0.95	cell part
GO:0044425	0.82	membrane part
GO:0044459	0.80	plasma membrane part
GO:0043234	0.78	protein complex
GO:0044421	0.73	extracellular region part
GO:0009897	0.66	external side of plasma membrane
GO:0042571	0.58	immunoglobulin complex, circulating
GO:0072562	0.57	blood microparticle
GO:0044424	0.51	intracellular part
GO:0043226	0.51	organelle

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.084	2wwmD	0.648	2.73	0.167	0.840	2.7.11.1	NA
2	0.067	2gg1A	0.544	2.62	0.098	0.736	2.7.7.48 3.4.21.91	NA
3	0.067	1tnnA	0.568	3.14	0.163	0.774	2.7.11.1	97
4	0.067	2rq8A	0.573	2.92	0.071	0.802	2.7.11.1	NA
5	0.067	2djmA	0.554	3.09	0.077	0.830	3.2.1.3	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.51	8fab0	0.926	0.78	0.951	0.962	0.96	III	complex1.pdb.gz	12,17,18,25,29,54,56,57,68,71,73
2	0.45	2h3n0	0.921	0.82	0.843	0.962	1.85	III	complex2.pdb.gz	10,12,13,23,25,27,29,54,56,57,59,61,69,71
3	0.13	1mco1	0.815	2.37	0.875	0.972	0.78	III	complex3.pdb.gz	8,10,11,12,14,15,17,27,28,29,30,31,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,67,68,69,70,71

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.