D-I-TASSER O95721-D1

D-I-TASSER results for O95721-D1

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>O95721 (258 residues)
MSAYPKSYNPFDDDGEDEGARPAPWRDARDLPDGPDAPADRQQYLRQEVLRRAEATAAST
SRSLALMYESEKVGVASSEELARQRGVLERTEKMVDKMDQDLKISQKHINSIKSVFGGLV
NYFKSKPVETPPEQNGTLTSQPNNRLKEAISTSKEQEAKYQASHPNLRKLDDTDPVPRGA
GSAMSTDAYPKNPHLRAYHQKIDSNLDELSMGLGRLKDIALGMQTEIEEQDDILDRLTTK
VDKLDVNIKSTERKVRQL

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MSAYPKSYNPFDDDGEDEGARPAPWRDARDLPDGPDAPADRQQYLRQEVLRRAEATAASTSRSLALMYESEKVGVASSEELARQRGVLERTEKMVDKMDQDLKISQKHINSIKSVFGGLVNYFKSKPVETPPEQNGTLTSQPNNRLKEAISTSKEQEAKYQASHPNLRKLDDTDPVPRGAGSAMSTDAYPKNPHLRAYHQKIDSNLDELSMGLGRLKDIALGMQTEIEEQDDILDRLTTKVDKLDVNIKSTERKVRQL
Prediction	CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHHHCHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCC
Confidence	999998899987766665667888765555667777515899999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999899999999999999998888752124634355411111221101110001222221000110111122332211112345555555543221101334778999999986199999999999999999999999999999999998999999999999999729
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MSAYPKSYNPFDDDGEDEGARPAPWRDARDLPDGPDAPADRQQYLRQEVLRRAEATAASTSRSLALMYESEKVGVASSEELARQRGVLERTEKMVDKMDQDLKISQKHINSIKSVFGGLVNYFKSKPVETPPEQNGTLTSQPNNRLKEAISTSKEQEAKYQASHPNLRKLDDTDPVPRGAGSAMSTDAYPKNPHLRAYHQKIDSNLDELSMGLGRLKDIALGMQTEIEEQDDILDRLTTKVDKLDVNIKSTERKVRQL
Prediction	855455431112444567544435454454355465445532540353145336402500440241043036203500530451453054045325414532540454154244010202224444435443343344444434344343443554544444444444444444444544444445544444443543455346335403510540351044135204512631550353155245315513532666
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180                 200                 220                 240

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHHHCHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCC
MSAYPKSYNPFDDDGEDEGARPAPWRDARDLPDGPDAPADRQQYLRQEVLRRAEATAASTSRSLALMYESEKVGVASSEELARQRGVLERTEKMVDKMDQDLKISQKHINSIKSVFGGLVNYFKSKPVETPPEQNGTLTSQPNNRLKEAISTSKEQEAKYQASHPNLRKLDDTDPVPRGAGSAMSTDAYPKNPHLRAYHQKIDSNLDELSMGLGRLKDIALGMQTEIEEQDDILDRLTTKVDKLDVNIKSTERKVRQL

3j96M

0.28

0.14

4.27

1.24

SPARKS-K

-----------------------------------------------RADQLADESLESTRRMLQLVEESKDAGIRTLVMLDEQGEQLDRVEEGMNHINQDMKEAEKNLKDLGK----------------------------------------------------------------------------------ARENEMDENLEQVSGIIGNLRHMALDMGNEIDTQNRQIDRIMEKADSNKTRIDEANQRATKM

3j96M

0.28

0.14

4.27

1.05

MUSTER

-----------------------------------------------RADQLADESLESTRRMLQLVEESKDAGIRTLVMLDEQGEQLDRVEEGMNHINQDMKEAEKNLKDLGK----------------------------------------------------------------------------------ARENEMDENLEQVSGIIGNLRHMALDMGNEIDTQNRQIDRIMEKADSNKTRIDEANQRATKM

3j96M

0.28

0.14

4.27

3.78

HHsearch

-----------------------------------------------RADQLADESLESTRRMLQLVEESKDAGIRTLVMLDEQGEQLDRVEEGMNHINQDMKEAEKNLKDLGK----------------------------------------------------------------------------------ARENEMDENLEQVSGIIGNLRHMALDMGNEIDTQNRQIDRIMEKADSNKTRIDEANQRATKM

3j96M

0.28

0.14

4.27

1.51

FFAS-3D

-----------------------------------------------RADQLADESLESTRRMLQLVEESKDAGIRTLVMLDEQGEQLDRVEEGMNHINQDMKEAEKNLKD----------------------------------------------------------------------------------LGKARENEMDENLEQVSGIIGNLRHMALDMGNEIDTQNRQIDRIMEKADSNKTRIDEANQRATKM

5ebzA

0.08

0.06

2.44

1.00

DEthreader

VG--------LNLKIFLLGCD--S-SDCV-Y-QLPIIQLRKVWAEAVHYVSGLKEDYSRLFQGQRAAMLSLLRYNANLTKMKNTLISASQQLKAKLEFFHKSIQLDLERYEQMTYGIS----------------------GEDQIMSLHAEIMEL-KS--G-----------------------STEVKIIVHTVQSQDRVLKELFGHLSKLLGCKQKIIDLLPKVEVALSNIKEADNTVMFMQGKRQKEIWHLLKIA

4tqlA

0.11

0.09

3.25

1.06

SPARKS-K

-------------------YKQMVQELEKARDRMEKLYKEMVELIQKAIELMRKIFQEVKQEVEKAIEEMKKLYDEAKKKIEQMIQQIKKMEELLKRAKEEMKKVKDKMEKLLEKLKQIMQEAKQKMEKQLKEEMKKMKEKMEKLLKEMKQRMEEVKKK---------------------MDDELLEKIKKNIDDKIAEDLIKKAEENIKEAKKIAEQLVKRAKQLIEKAKQVAEELIKKILQLIEKAKEIAEKVLKG

1fewA

0.06

0.04

1.82

0.76

MapAlign

----------------------------------LSSEALMRRAVSLVTDSTSTFLSQTTYALIEAITEYTKAVYTLTSLYRQYTSLLGKMNSEEEDEVWQVIIGARAEMTSKHQ-----------------------EYLKLETTWMTAVGLSEMAAEAAY-------------------------QTGADQASITARNHIQLVKLQVEEVHQLSRKAETKLAEAQIEELKQKTQEEGEERAESEQEAYLRED----

3j96M

0.28

0.14

4.27

0.57

CEthreader

-----------------------------------------------RADQLADESLESTRRMLQLVEESKDAGIRTLVMLDEQGEQLDRVEEGMNHINQDMKEAEKNLKDLGK----------------------------------------------------------------------------------ARENEMDENLEQVSGIIGNLRHMALDMGNEIDTQNRQIDRIMEKADSNKTRIDEANQRATKM

5nnvA

0.09

0.08

2.98

0.84

MUSTER

--------------------AKEEELAESSAISAKEAKIEDTRDKIQALDESVDELQQVLLVTSEELEKLEGRKEVLKERKKNAVQNQEQLEEAIVQFQQKETVLKEELSKQEAVFETL----QAEVKQLRAQVKEKQQLSNELTELKIAAAKKEQACKGEEDNLARLKKELTETELALKEAKEDLSFLTSESSSTSGEEKLEEAAKHKLNDKTKTIELIALRRDQRIKLQHGLDTYERELKEKRLYKQKTTLL----

4wy4C

1.00

0.30

8.47

2.37

HHsearch

--------------------------------------ADRQQYLRQEVLRRAEATAASTSRSLALMYESEKVGVASSEELARQRGVLERTEKMVDKMDQDLKISQKHINSIKSVF----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.5586

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	4tqlA	0.53	5.07	0.068	0.771	model1_4tqlA.pdb.gz
2	5owvC	0.49	5.82	0.073	0.818	model1_5owvC.pdb.gz
3	6r3qA	0.48	5.19	0.046	0.721	model1_6r3qA.pdb.gz
4	5xbjA1	0.47	4.70	0.043	0.655	model1_5xbjA1.pdb.gz
5	1f31A3	0.46	5.43	0.025	0.705	model1_1f31A3.pdb.gz
6	5ebzA	0.46	6.37	0.064	0.822	model1_5ebzA.pdb.gz
7	6j72A	0.46	5.83	0.063	0.736	model1_6j72A.pdb.gz
8	4gnkE	0.45	5.43	0.092	0.721	model1_4gnkE.pdb.gz
9	6th1R	0.45	4.97	0.025	0.659	model1_6th1R.pdb.gz
10	3ffzA	0.45	5.64	0.022	0.702	model1_3ffzA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0005484	0.99	SNAP receptor activity
GO:0000149	0.98	SNARE binding
GO:0019905	0.97	syntaxin binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044699	0.99	single-organism process
GO:0009987	0.96	cellular process
GO:0044763	0.94	single-organism cellular process
GO:0016043	0.94	cellular component organization
GO:1902589	0.92	single-organism organelle organization
GO:0048284	0.92	organelle fusion
GO:0061025	0.90	membrane fusion
GO:0022607	0.90	cellular component assembly
GO:0006906	0.88	vesicle fusion
GO:0071822	0.87	protein complex subunit organization
GO:0031629	0.86	synaptic vesicle fusion to presynaptic active zone membrane
GO:0016082	0.86	synaptic vesicle priming

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	1.00	cell part
GO:0016020	1.00	membrane
GO:0044424	0.95	intracellular part
GO:0044444	0.93	cytoplasmic part
GO:0005886	0.93	plasma membrane
GO:0044425	0.88	membrane part
GO:0031201	0.87	SNARE complex

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1b0pA	0.350	6.18	0.045	0.597	1.2.7.1	NA
2	0.060	1clqA	0.346	5.94	0.051	0.562	2.7.7.7	222
3	0.060	1n63B	0.353	5.65	0.032	0.558	1.2.99.2	NA
4	0.060	2pdaA	0.345	6.34	0.064	0.601	1.2.7.1	NA
5	0.060	3g61A	0.400	6.57	0.019	0.756	3.6.3.44	150

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.01	3h6vA	0.203	5.72	0.067	0.333	0.66	NS6	complex1.pdb.gz	73,78,219,223,224,226
2	0.01	3il1E	0.206	5.55	0.043	0.337	0.70	B5D	complex2.pdb.gz	74,219,223
3	0.01	3ijoE	0.201	5.85	0.045	0.333	0.69	B4D	complex3.pdb.gz	73,76,77,217,222,223
4	0.01	3ijxB	0.200	5.81	0.079	0.333	0.64	HCZ	complex4.pdb.gz	73,78,216,219
5	0.01	2w6dB	0.440	5.40	0.046	0.686	0.70	CPL	complex5.pdb.gz	81,82,84
6	0.01	3pmvA	0.204	6.19	0.031	0.357	0.60	557	complex6.pdb.gz	75,79,80,81,223
7	0.01	3iluH	0.204	5.89	0.043	0.349	0.61	HFZ	complex7.pdb.gz	74,75,76,220,223
8	0.01	3il1H	0.206	5.51	0.043	0.337	0.97	B5D	complex8.pdb.gz	75,219,220,223

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.