D-I-TASSER O75144

D-I-TASSER results for O75144

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: O75144
Protein Name: ICOS ligand
Gene Name: ICOSLG

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>O75144 (302 residues)
MRLGSPGLLFLLFSSLRADTQEKEVRAMVGSDVELSCACPEGSRFDLNDVYVYWQTSESK
TVVTYHIPQNSSLENVDSRYRNRALMSPAGMLRGDFSLRLFNVTPQDEQKFHCLVLSQSL
GFQEVLSVEVTLHVAANFSVPVVSAPHSPSQDELTFTCTSINGYPRPNVYWINKTDNSLL
DQALQNDTVFLNMRGLYDVVSVLRIARTPSVNIGCCIENVLLQQNLTVGSQTGNDIGERD
KITENPVSTGEKNAATWSILAVLCLLVVVAVAIGWVCRDRCLQHSYAGAWAVSPETELTG
HV

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of DeepPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	O75144-D1	1-135	135		MRLGSPGLLFLLFSSLRADTQEKEVRAMVGSDVELSCACPEGSRFDLNDVYVYWQTSESKTVVTYHIPQNSSLENVDSRYRNRALMSPAGMLRGDFSLRLFNVTPQDEQKFHCLVLSQSLGFQEVLSVEVTLHVA
2	O75144-D2	136-245	110		ANFSVPVVSAPHSPSQDELTFTCTSINGYPRPNVYWINKTDNSLLDQALQNDTVFLNMRGLYDVVSVLRIARTPSVNIGCCIENVLLQQNLTVGSQTGNDIGERDKITEN
3	O75144-D3	246-302	57		PVSTGEKNAATWSILAVLCLLVVVAVAIGWVCRDRCLQHSYAGAWAVSPETELTGHV

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.56

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of DeepPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	4fmkA	0.58	3.27	0.185	0.692	model1_4fmkA.pdb.gz
2	4ofyD	0.58	3.73	0.102	0.719	model1_4ofyD.pdb.gz
3	4hh8A	0.57	3.17	0.223	0.682	model1_4hh8A.pdb.gz
4	3alpA	0.56	4.23	0.145	0.735	model1_3alpA.pdb.gz
5	4f80A	0.56	3.39	0.243	0.682	model1_4f80A.pdb.gz
6	2petA	0.55	3.52	0.154	0.689	model1_2petA.pdb.gz
7	4fomA	0.55	4.38	0.081	0.735	model1_4fomA.pdb.gz
8	3pv6A	0.55	3.34	0.163	0.666	model1_3pv6A.pdb.gz
9	1l6zA	0.54	3.13	0.119	0.642	model1_1l6zA.pdb.gz
10	4oi9A	0.54	4.09	0.109	0.682	model1_4oi9A.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0005102	0.57	receptor binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0065007	0.92	biological regulation
GO:0050789	0.91	regulation of biological process
GO:0050794	0.89	regulation of cellular process
GO:0048518	0.81	positive regulation of biological process
GO:0048522	0.78	positive regulation of cellular process
GO:0002682	0.74	regulation of immune system process
GO:0050863	0.70	regulation of T cell activation
GO:0044699	0.65	single-organism process
GO:0042127	0.64	regulation of cell proliferation
GO:0002684	0.64	positive regulation of immune system process
GO:0009987	0.62	cellular process
GO:0050870	0.61	positive regulation of T cell activation
GO:0042129	0.61	regulation of T cell proliferation
GO:0002376	0.58	immune system process
GO:0044763	0.52	single-organism cellular process
GO:0008284	0.52	positive regulation of cell proliferation

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	0.94	cell part
GO:0043226	0.68	organelle
GO:0043227	0.67	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0044421	0.62	extracellular region part
GO:0031988	0.57	membrane-bounded vesicle
GO:0070062	0.56	extracellular exosome
GO:0016020	0.56	membrane
GO:0044424	0.51	intracellular part

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1ej6A	0.361	5.48	0.033	0.543	2.7.7.50	NA
2	0.060	2vdcA	0.353	6.07	0.058	0.570	1.4.1.13	NA
3	0.060	2e9bA	0.372	4.92	0.035	0.530	3.2.1.41	NA
4	0.060	1es0B	0.330	3.46	0.117	0.391	4.1.1.15	NA
5	0.060	1h16A	0.303	6.63	0.050	0.523	2.3.1.54	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.02	2if70	0.520	2.79	0.155	0.599	0.41	III	complex1.pdb.gz	51,55,61,62,65,79,112,114
2	0.01	1c5cH	0.425	4.80	0.099	0.616	0.69	TK4	complex2.pdb.gz	31,103,105,106
3	0.01	2j6e6	0.344	3.54	0.085	0.411	0.72	III	complex3.pdb.gz	144,227,228,229,230,231,232
4	0.01	2dtq0	0.345	3.22	0.100	0.404	0.43	III	complex4.pdb.gz	30,85,87,96,98,129
5	0.01	2vuoB	0.346	3.37	0.113	0.407	0.41	UUU	complex5.pdb.gz	37,91,95,97
6	0.01	1um5H	0.355	3.49	0.089	0.424	0.41	SS1	complex6.pdb.gz	159,198,201
7	0.01	2j6eB	0.344	3.54	0.085	0.411	0.60	UUU	complex7.pdb.gz	142,144,146,155,157,161,162,192,194,198,228
8	0.01	1um4H	0.352	3.57	0.089	0.424	0.50	SH4	complex8.pdb.gz	170,172,173,213,214,217

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.