D-I-TASSER O60245

D-I-TASSER results for O60245

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: O60245
Protein Name: Protocadherin-7
Gene Name: PCDH7

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>O60245 (1069 residues)
MLRMRTAGWARGWCLGCCLLLPLSLSLAAAKQLLRYRLAEEGPADVRIGNVASDLGIVTG
SGEVTFSLESGSEYLKIDNLTGELSTSERRIDREKLPQCQMIFDENECFLDFEVSVIGPS
QSWVDLFEGQVIVLDINDNTPTFPSPVLTLTVEENRPVGTLYLLPTATDRDFGRNGIERY
ELLQEPGGGGSGGESRRAGAADSAPYPGGGGNGASGGGSGGSKRRLDASEGGGGTNPGGR
SSVFELQVADTPDGEKQPQLIVKGALDREQRDSYELTLRVRDGGDPPRSSQAILRVLITD
VNDNSPRFEKSVYEADLAENSAPGTPILQLRAADLDVGVNGQIEYVFGAATESVRRLLRL
DETSGWLSVLHRIDREEVNQLRFTVMARDRGQPPKTDKATVVLNIKDENDNVPSIEIRKI
GRIPLKDGVANVAEDVLVDTPIALVQVSDRDQGENGVVTCTVVGDVPFQLKPASDTEGDQ
NKKKYFLHTSTPLDYEATREFNVVIVAVDSGSPSLSSNNSLIVKVGDTNDNPPMFGQSVV
EVYFPENNIPGERVATVLATDADSGKNAEIAYSLDSSVMGIFAIDPDSGDILVNTVLDRE
QTDRYEFKVNAKDKGIPVLQGSTTVIVQVADKNDNDPKFMQDVFTFYVKENLQPNSPVGM
VTVMDADKGRNAEMSLYIEENNNIFSIENDTGTIYSTMSFDREHQTTYTFRVKAVDGGDP
PRSATATVSLFVMDENDNAPTVTLPKNISYTLLPPSSNVRTVVATVLATDSDDGINADLN
YSIVGGNPFKLFEIDPTSGVVSLVGKLTQKHYGLHRLVVQVNDSGQPSQSTTTLVHVFVN
ESVSNATAIDSQIARSLHIPLTQDIAGDPSYEISKQRLSIVIGVVAGIMTVILIILIVVM
ARYCRSKNKNGYEAGKKDHEDFFTPQQHDKSKKPKKDKKNKKSKQPLYSSIVTVEASKPN
GQRYDSVNEKLSDSPSMGRYRSVNGGPGSPDLARHYKSSSPLPTVQLHPQSPTAGKKHQA
VQDLPPANTFVGAGDNISIGSDHCSEYSCQTNNKYSKQMRLHPYITVFG

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	O60245-D1	1-134	134		MLRMRTAGWARGWCLGCCLLLPLSLSLAAAKQLLRYRLAEEGPADVRIGNVASDLGIVTGSGEVTFSLESGSEYLKIDNLTGELSTSERRIDREKLPQCQMIFDENECFLDFEVSVIGPSQSWVDLFEGQVIVL
2	O60245-D2	135-301	167		DINDNTPTFPSPVLTLTVEENRPVGTLYLLPTATDRDFGRNGIERYELLQEPGGGGSGGESRRAGAADSAPYPGGGGNGASGGGSGGSKRRLDASEGGGGTNPGGRSSVFELQVADTPDGEKQPQLIVKGALDREQRDSYELTLRVRDGGDPPRSSQAILRVLITDV
3	O60245-D3	302-409	108		NDNSPRFEKSVYEADLAENSAPGTPILQLRAADLDVGVNGQIEYVFGAATESVRRLLRLDETSGWLSVLHRIDREEVNQLRFTVMARDRGQPPKTDKATVVLNIKDEN
4	O60245-D4	410-528	119		DNVPSIEIRKIGRIPLKDGVANVAEDVLVDTPIALVQVSDRDQGENGVVTCTVVGDVPFQLKPASDTEGDQNKKKYFLHTSTPLDYEATREFNVVIVAVDSGSPSLSSNNSLIVKVGDT
5	O60245-D5	529-630	102		NDNPPMFGQSVVEVYFPENNIPGERVATVLATDADSGKNAEIAYSLDSSVMGIFAIDPDSGDILVNTVLDREQTDRYEFKVNAKDKGIPVLQGSTTVIVQVA
6	O60245-D6	631-738,902-1069	276		DKNDNDPKFMQDVFTFYVKENLQPNSPVGMVTVMDADKGRNAEMSLYIEENNNIFSIENDTGTIYSTMSFDREHQTTYTFRVKAVDGGDPPRSATATVSLFVMDENDNRYCRSKNKNGYEAGKKDHEDFFTPQQHDKSKKPKKDKKNKKSKQPLYSSIVTVEASKPNGQRYDSVNEKLSDSPSMGRYRSVNGGPGSPDLARHYKSSSPLPTVQLHPQSPTAGKKHQAVQDLPPANTFVGAGDNISIGSDHCSEYSCQTNNKYSKQMRLHPYITVFG
7	O60245-D7	739-901	163		APTVTLPKNISYTLLPPSSNVRTVVATVLATDSDDGINADLNYSIVGGNPFKLFEIDPTSGVVSLVGKLTQKHYGLHRLVVQVNDSGQPSQSTTTLVHVFVNESVSNATAIDSQIARSLHIPLTQDIAGDPSYEISKQRLSIVIGVVAGIMTVILIILIVVMA

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.55

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	6l7eA	0.30	9.64	0.031	0.488	model1_6l7eA.pdb.gz
2	6vg4A	0.29	6.31	0.095	0.366	model1_6vg4A.pdb.gz
3	6c13A	0.29	6.56	0.105	0.372	model1_6c13A.pdb.gz
4	3q2wA	0.28	6.68	0.116	0.371	model1_3q2wA.pdb.gz
5	5sznA	0.28	6.22	0.114	0.353	model1_5sznA.pdb.gz
6	3q2vA	0.28	6.55	0.120	0.363	model1_3q2vA.pdb.gz
7	6rw9A	0.28	9.51	0.032	0.449	model1_6rw9A.pdb.gz
8	7cpxA	0.27	9.69	0.038	0.443	model1_7cpxA.pdb.gz
9	6wjvA	0.27	9.32	0.045	0.429	model1_6wjvA.pdb.gz
10	5iryA	0.27	7.01	0.118	0.368	model1_5iryA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0043169	0.71	cation binding
GO:0004872	0.61	receptor activity
GO:0005044	0.59	scavenger receptor activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0007155	0.70	cell adhesion
GO:0044699	0.68	single-organism process
GO:0098609	0.65	cell-cell adhesion
GO:0098742	0.60	cell-cell adhesion via plasma-membrane adhesion molecules
GO:0031638	0.59	zymogen activation
GO:0007156	0.52	homophilic cell adhesion via plasma membrane adhesion molecules

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	0.83	cell part
GO:0016020	0.76	membrane
GO:0005886	0.61	plasma membrane
GO:0044456	0.60	synapse part
GO:0043083	0.59	synaptic cleft
GO:0044425	0.56	membrane part
GO:0044459	0.52	plasma membrane part

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	3dy5A	0.200	8.20	0.034	0.289	1.13.11.40 4.2.1.92	NA
2	0.060	3ixzA	0.200	9.40	0.034	0.317	3.6.3.10	778
3	0.060	3ffzA	0.205	8.77	0.032	0.305	3.4.24.69	NA
4	0.060	2hr7A	0.144	6.93	0.056	0.193	2.7.10.1	NA
5	0.060	3b8eA	0.201	9.27	0.038	0.316	3.6.3.9	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Click to view	Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
	1	0.01	2omy1	0.087	2.19	0.144	0.090	0.11	III	complex1.pdb.gz	64,65,115,117,119,122

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.