D-I-TASSER O15466

D-I-TASSER results for O15466

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: O15466
Protein Name: Alpha-2,8-sialyltransferase 8E
Gene Name: ST8SIA5

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>O15466 (376 residues)
MRYADPSANRDLLGSRTLLFIFICAFALVTLLQQILYGRNYIKRYFEFYEGPFEYNSTRC
LELRHEILEVKVLSMVKQSELFDRWKSLQMCKWAMNISEANQFKSTLSRCCNAPAFLFTT
QKNTPLGTKLKYEVDTSGIYHINQEIFRMFPKDMPYYRSQFKKCAVVGNGGILKNSRCGR
EINSADFVFRCNLPPISEKYTMDVGVKTDVVTVNPSIITERFHKLEKWRRPFYRVLQVYE
NASVLLPAFYNTRNTDVSIRVKYVLDDFESPQAVYYFHPQYLVNVSRYWLSLGVRAKRIS
TGLILVTAALELCEEVHLFGFWAFPMNPSGLYITHHYYDNVKPRPGFHAMPSEIFNFLHL
HSRGILRVHTGTCSCC

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	O15466-D1	1-376	376		MRYADPSANRDLLGSRTLLFIFICAFALVTLLQQILYGRNYIKRYFEFYEGPFEYNSTRCLELRHEILEVKVLSMVKQSELFDRWKSLQMCKWAMNISEANQFKSTLSRCCNAPAFLFTTQKNTPLGTKLKYEVDTSGIYHINQEIFRMFPKDMPYYRSQFKKCAVVGNGGILKNSRCGREINSADFVFRCNLPPISEKYTMDVGVKTDVVTVNPSIITERFHKLEKWRRPFYRVLQVYENASVLLPAFYNTRNTDVSIRVKYVLDDFESPQAVYYFHPQYLVNVSRYWLSLGVRAKRISTGLILVTAALELCEEVHLFGFWAFPMNPSGLYITHHYYDNVKPRPGFHAMPSEIFNFLHLHSRGILRVHTGTCSCC

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.563

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	5bo6A	0.69	2.18	0.282	0.742	model1_5bo6A.pdb.gz
2	4js1A	0.57	3.81	0.161	0.678	model1_4js1A.pdb.gz
3	6apjC	0.53	4.17	0.209	0.654	model1_6apjC.pdb.gz
4	2wmlA	0.53	3.79	0.270	0.628	model1_2wmlA.pdb.gz
5	1r8wA	0.44	5.94	0.046	0.660	model1_1r8wA.pdb.gz
6	6lonB	0.43	5.78	0.058	0.646	model1_6lonB.pdb.gz
7	2iobB	0.43	6.70	0.058	0.705	model1_2iobB.pdb.gz
8	5mu5A	0.42	5.09	0.058	0.575	model1_5mu5A.pdb.gz
9	6ec6A	0.42	5.36	0.059	0.601	model1_6ec6A.pdb.gz
10	3k46A	0.42	5.23	0.022	0.588	model1_3k46A.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0003824	1.00	catalytic activity
GO:0008373	0.99	sialyltransferase activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044699	0.99	single-organism process
GO:0009987	0.98	cellular process
GO:0008152	0.98	metabolic process
GO:0071704	0.97	organic substance metabolic process
GO:0044763	0.96	single-organism cellular process
GO:0044710	0.96	single-organism metabolic process
GO:0044238	0.96	primary metabolic process
GO:0044237	0.96	cellular metabolic process
GO:0005975	0.94	carbohydrate metabolic process
GO:0044260	0.92	cellular macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0044723	0.91	single-organism carbohydrate metabolic process
GO:0006464	0.91	cellular protein modification process
GO:0009311	0.88	oligosaccharide metabolic process
GO:0006486	0.87	protein glycosylation
GO:0018279	0.80	protein N-linked glycosylation via asparagine
GO:1901135	0.75	carbohydrate derivative metabolic process
GO:0044255	0.73	cellular lipid metabolic process
GO:1903509	0.72	liposaccharide metabolic process
GO:0006643	0.72	membrane lipid metabolic process
GO:1901576	0.71	organic substance biosynthetic process
GO:0006807	0.71	nitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:0006664	0.71	glycolipid metabolic process
GO:1901564	0.70	organonitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:0044711	0.70	single-organism biosynthetic process
GO:0044249	0.70	cellular biosynthetic process
GO:1901137	0.69	carbohydrate derivative biosynthetic process
GO:0008610	0.69	lipid biosynthetic process
GO:0006665	0.69	sphingolipid metabolic process
GO:0030148	0.68	sphingolipid biosynthetic process
GO:0009247	0.68	glycolipid biosynthetic process
GO:0006687	0.68	glycosphingolipid metabolic process
GO:0006688	0.67	glycosphingolipid biosynthetic process
GO:0046513	0.64	ceramide biosynthetic process
GO:0001574	0.63	ganglioside biosynthetic process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044464	0.97	cell part
GO:0044424	0.95	intracellular part
GO:0044444	0.94	cytoplasmic part
GO:0044446	0.89	intracellular organelle part
GO:0016020	0.88	membrane
GO:0044431	0.87	Golgi apparatus part
GO:0000139	0.82	Golgi membrane

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1jcnB	0.335	6.35	0.046	0.535	1.1.1.205	NA
2	0.060	1tiwA	0.318	6.07	0.027	0.479	1.5.1.12 1.5.99.8	NA
3	0.060	3lggA	0.375	5.93	0.054	0.567	3.5.4.4	197
4	0.060	1edgA	0.368	6.03	0.068	0.558	3.2.1.4	NA
5	0.060	2zxqA	0.383	6.03	0.048	0.572	3.2.1.97	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Click to view	Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
	1	0.33	2wnbA	0.529	3.76	0.278	0.630	1.32	C5P	complex1.pdb.gz	168,169,170,191,192,300,302,321,322,336
	2	0.15	1ro7D	0.365	4.67	0.203	0.473	0.94	CSF	complex2.pdb.gz	168,169,170,171,191,192,193,214,300,301,320,321,322,348

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.