D-I-TASSER A8MYJ7

D-I-TASSER results for A8MYJ7

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: A8MYJ7
Protein Name: Tetratricopeptide repeat protein 34
Gene Name: TTC34

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>A8MYJ7 (566 residues)
MLQRSPRAGPSRAQGRREAAETGGPTTQEGVACGVHQLATLLMELDSEDEASRLLAADAL
YRLGRLEETHKALLVALSRRPQAAPVLARLALLQLRRGFFYDANQLVKKLVQSGDTACLQ
PTLDVFCHEDRQLLQGHCHARALAILRARPGGADGRVHTKEAIAYLSLAIFAAGSQASES
LLARARCYGFLGQKKTAMFDFNTVLRAEPGNVQALCGRALVHLALDQLQEAVDDIVSALK
LGPGTVVPELRSLKPEAQALITQGLYSHCRALLSQLPDTGAPLEDKDTQGLLAVGEALIK
IDSGQPHWHLLLADILMAQGSYEEAGTHLEKALHRAPTSEAARARLGLLQLKKGDVPGAA
RDLQSLAEVDAPDLSCLLHLLEASERQSLAQAAAQEAGTLLDAGQPRQALGYCSLSVLAS
GSSACHLRLRATCLAELQEFGRALRDLDHVLQEALGDGDLPRRAEDFCRQGRLLLSLGDE
AAAAGAFAQALKLAPSLAQNSLCRQPGRAPTARMFLLRGQCCLEEQRHAEAWTAVESGLL
VDPDHRGLKRLKARIRREASSGCWLQ

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	A8MYJ7-D1	1-81	81		MLQRSPRAGPSRAQGRREAAETGGPTTQEGVACGVHQLATLLMELDSEDEASRLLAADALYRLGRLEETHKALLVALSRRP
2	A8MYJ7-D2	82-176	95		QAAPVLARLALLQLRRGFFYDANQLVKKLVQSGDTACLQPTLDVFCHEDRQLLQGHCHARALAILRARPGGADGRVHTKEAIAYLSLAIFAAGSQ
3	A8MYJ7-D3	177-241	65		ASESLLARARCYGFLGQKKTAMFDFNTVLRAEPGNVQALCGRALVHLALDQLQEAVDDIVSALKL
4	A8MYJ7-D4	242-403	162		GPGTVVPELRSLKPEAQALITQGLYSHCRALLSQLPDTGAPLEDKDTQGLLAVGEALIKIDSGQPHWHLLLADILMAQGSYEEAGTHLEKALHRAPTSEAARARLGLLQLKKGDVPGAARDLQSLAEVDAPDLSCLLHLLEASERQSLAQAAAQEAGTLLDA
5	A8MYJ7-D5	404-566	163		GQPRQALGYCSLSVLASGSSACHLRLRATCLAELQEFGRALRDLDHVLQEALGDGDLPRRAEDFCRQGRLLLSLGDEAAAAGAFAQALKLAPSLAQNSLCRQPGRAPTARMFLLRGQCCLEEQRHAEAWTAVESGLLVDPDHRGLKRLKARIRREASSGCWLQ

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.69

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	5hb4B	0.59	6.94	0.068	0.901	model1_5hb4B.pdb.gz
2	6yejA	0.56	7.28	0.077	0.876	model1_6yejA.pdb.gz
3	5u1sA	0.55	7.05	0.054	0.848	model1_5u1sA.pdb.gz
4	3opbA	0.53	6.17	0.068	0.751	model1_3opbA.pdb.gz
5	7nscE	0.53	5.92	0.071	0.739	model1_7nscE.pdb.gz
6	3a6pA	0.52	7.13	0.062	0.807	model1_3a6pA.pdb.gz
7	6bcuA	0.51	7.07	0.067	0.784	model1_6bcuA.pdb.gz
8	5fvmA	0.51	6.67	0.054	0.758	model1_5fvmA.pdb.gz
9	6swy5	0.50	6.74	0.076	0.746	model1_6swy5.pdb.gz
10	3c2hB	0.50	6.24	0.070	0.719	model1_3c2hB.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0046872	1.00	metal ion binding
GO:0019899	0.62	enzyme binding
GO:1901363	0.53	heterocyclic compound binding
GO:0097159	0.53	organic cyclic compound binding
GO:0031267	0.50	small GTPase binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0038061	1.00	NIK/NF-kappaB signaling
GO:0009987	0.80	cellular process
GO:0051179	0.56	localization
GO:0051234	0.55	establishment of localization
GO:0006810	0.54	transport
GO:0016043	0.53	cellular component organization
GO:0046907	0.51	intracellular transport
GO:0071702	0.50	organic substance transport

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0005634	1.00	nucleus
GO:0044422	0.93	organelle part
GO:0044446	0.92	intracellular organelle part
GO:0032991	0.80	macromolecular complex
GO:0044428	0.77	nuclear part
GO:0043234	0.76	protein complex
GO:0044444	0.71	cytoplasmic part
GO:0005737	0.66	cytoplasm
GO:0016020	0.52	membrane

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	2q1fA	0.344	7.68	0.054	0.567	4.2.2.21	NA
2	0.060	2zxqA	0.388	7.75	0.053	0.643	3.2.1.97	NA
3	0.060	2q3zA	0.320	7.89	0.040	0.535	2.3.2.13	NA
4	0.060	2j62A	0.288	7.12	0.060	0.447	3.2.1.52	NA
5	0.060	3k1dA	0.317	7.45	0.062	0.503	2.4.1.18	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.01	1iq1C	0.433	5.42	0.098	0.578	0.14	III	complex1.pdb.gz	54,91,92,93,134,174,177
2	0.01	3btrC	0.422	5.58	0.074	0.567	0.16	III	complex2.pdb.gz	62,63,94,96,137,176
3	0.01	1qgrA	0.409	6.50	0.054	0.599	0.12	III	complex3.pdb.gz	12,90,122,175
4	0.01	1i7x3	0.432	6.64	0.105	0.650	0.14	III	complex4.pdb.gz	13,16,28,54,55,58,208,214
5	0.01	1i7x1	0.445	6.51	0.101	0.657	0.10	III	complex5.pdb.gz	38,348,349
6	0.01	1jdh0	0.401	7.57	0.087	0.661	0.12	III	complex6.pdb.gz	96,136,144,180,183,186,216
7	0.01	2gl70	0.439	6.22	0.099	0.632	0.13	III	complex7.pdb.gz	92,93,96,135,218
8	0.01	1pjnB	0.433	5.43	0.098	0.578	0.19	III	complex8.pdb.gz	35,51,55,58,59,85,89,121,175,179,181,207,238
9	0.01	2c1m0	0.407	5.58	0.108	0.553	0.21	III	complex9.pdb.gz	89,93,124,240,241,243,274,275,278
10	0.01	2gl7D	0.403	7.44	0.062	0.654	0.12	III	complex10.pdb.gz	72,138,139,179,180,186,217

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.