D-I-TASSER A8MTL3-D1

D-I-TASSER results for A8MTL3-D1

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>A8MTL3 (300 residues)
MDWFHCNQCFRKDGAHFFVTSCGHIFCKKCVTLEKCAVCGTACKHLALSDNLKPQEKMFF
KSPVETALQYFSHISQVWSFQKKQTDLLIAFYKHRITKLETAMQEAQQALVSQDKELSVL
RKENGELKKFLAILKESPSRYQGSRSITPRPVGITSPSQSVTPRPSFQHSSQVVSRSSSA
ESIPYREAGFGSLGQGGRGLQGRRTPRDSYNETPSPASTHSLSYRTSSASSGQGIFSFRP
SPNGHSGHTRVLTPNNFAQRESTTTLESLPSFQLPVLQTLYQQRRHMGLPSGREAWTTSR

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MDWFHCNQCFRKDGAHFFVTSCGHIFCKKCVTLEKCAVCGTACKHLALSDNLKPQEKMFFKSPVETALQYFSHISQVWSFQKKQTDLLIAFYKHRITKLETAMQEAQQALVSQDKELSVLRKENGELKKFLAILKESPSRYQGSRSITPRPVGITSPSQSVTPRPSFQHSSQVVSRSSSAESIPYREAGFGSLGQGGRGLQGRRTPRDSYNETPSPASTHSLSYRTSSASSGQGIFSFRPSPNGHSGHTRVLTPNNFAQRESTTTLESLPSFQLPVLQTLYQQRRHMGLPSGREAWTTSR
Prediction	CCCSSCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSCCCCHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCC
Confidence	984367655767999789815864321777414888546883650125642026789872352668999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999737776432112322112234311367763223344444544333467754455566665544445567887556789999887777767776667776545688877778875557998655665667755575333541121788865315643111122359
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MDWFHCNQCFRKDGAHFFVTSCGHIFCKKCVTLEKCAVCGTACKHLALSDNLKPQEKMFFKSPVETALQYFSHISQVWSFQKKQTDLLIAFYKHRITKLETAMQEAQQALVSQDKELSVLRKENGELKKFLAILKESPSRYQGSRSITPRPVGITSPSQSVTPRPSFQHSSQVVSRSSSAESIPYREAGFGSLGQGGRGLQGRRTPRDSYNETPSPASTHSLSYRTSSASSGQGIFSFRPSPNGHSGHTRVLTPNNFAQRESTTTLESLPSFQLPVLQTLYQQRRHMGLPSGREAWTTSR
Prediction	742010020134473301000000000350165630420444043340355235503421353353145105403502511453243014304621540453155145414514541551354155035305514544553554454454445343545534455534453544444444554344444344345444435454444654554444344554444444444444434343435464444434445434445544434423334353154235245433345455445468
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180                 200                 220                 240                 260                 280                 300

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCSSCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSCCCCHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCC
MDWFHCNQCFRKDGAHFFVTSCGHIFCKKCVTLEKCAVCGTACKHLALSDNLKPQEKMFFKSPVETALQYFSHISQVWSFQKKQTDLLIAFYKHRITKLETAMQEAQQALVSQDKELSVLRKENGELKKFLAILKESPSRYQGSRSITPRPVGITSPSQSVTPRPSFQHSSQVVSRSSSAESIPYREAGFGSLGQGGRGLQGRRTPRDSYNETPSPASTHSLSYRTSSASSGQGIFSFRPSPNGHSGHTRVLTPNNFAQRESTTTLESLPSFQLPVLQTLYQQRRHMGLPSGREAWTTSR

5lj5t

0.05

2.43

1.25

CEthreader

---MLCAISGKVPRRPVLSPKSRTIFEKSLLDTGNDPITNEPLSIEEIVPNLLTSLQNEWDAKLRSTLDSLTKKLSTVMYERDAAKLVAAQLLMEKNEDSKDLPKSSQQAPKWPILKNLELLQAQNYSRNIKTFPYKELNKSMYYDKWVCMCRCEDGALHFTQLKDSKTITTITTPNPRTGGEHPAIISRGPCNRLLLLITILDSKTNKVLREIEVDSANEIIYMYGHNTEYFIWADNRGTSAKSDVEYSSGVLHKDSLLLALYSPDGIQASSRFPVDEEAKIKEVKFADNGYWMVVECD

5gmkq

0.05

2.43

1.68

MapAlign

-MLCAISGKVPR---RPVLSPKSTIFEKSLLDTGNDPITNEPLSEIVEIVPSAQQASSIPNLLTSLQNEWDAIMLENFKLRSTLDSLTKKLSTVMYERDAAKLVAAQLLMEKNEDSKDLPKSPNPRTGGEHPARLLLLYPSKTNKVLREMYGHNEVNTEYFIWADNRGTIGFYIVHSAKSDVEYSSGVLHKDSLLLALYSPLDVYNLSSPDQASSRFPAKIKEVKFADNGYWMVVEVVCFDLRKDVGTLAYYDIDMIAYSNESNSLTIYKFDTKDEESALCLQSDTADFTDMDVVCGDAI

5gmkq

0.08

3.15

1.07

CEthreader

---MLCAISGKVPRRPVLSPKSRTIFEKSLLEQKDTGNDPITNEPLSIEEIVEIVPSAQQASSIPNLLTSLQNEWDAIMLENFKLRSTLDSLTKKLSTVMYERDAAKLVAAQLLMEKNEDSKDLPKSSQQDFVARGKLKAPKWPILKNLELLQKTFPARLLLLYPSKTNKVLREMYGHNEVNTEYFIWADNRGTIGFYIVHSAKSDVEYSSGVLHKDSLLLALYSPDGILDPAKIKEVKFADNGYWMVVELRKDVGTLAYPTYKTGTKKKNWTKDEESALCLQSDTADFTDMDVVCGDAI

4tn3A

0.07

2.85

0.75

EigenThreader

VD----HCARHGEKLLLFCQEDSKVICWLCKDS---QEHRGHHTFLMEEVAQEYHVKLQTALEMLRQKQQEAEKLEADIREEKASWKIQIDYDKTNVSADFEQLREILDWEESNELQNLEKTEMVQQTQYMRELISELEHRLQMAAEESPVLLAMNIFEMLRIDEGLRLKIYKN-----TEGYYTIGIGSPSLNAAKSELDKAIGRNTNGVITRGILRNAKLKPVYDSLDAVRRAALINMVFQMGETGVAGFTNSLRMLQQKRWDEAAVNLAKSRWYNQTPNRAKRVITTFRTGTWDAYK

6nmiH

0.20

0.09

2.98

0.83

FFAS-3D

MDDQGCPRCYRNPSLKLMVNVCGHTLCESCVGAGNCPECGSNFRVQLFEDPTVDKEVEIRKKVLKDLDNTKKKMEIYQKENKDVIQKNKLKLTREQEELEEALEVERQENEQRRLFIQKEEQLQQILQAFLDELESS-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3jc8Na

0.10

0.08

2.81

0.99

SPARKS-K

---------------------------------------------MMIRINLLPVRAVKKREMGRQVLVLFAVVLIGAGVANYLWYDDRQSELEAHQAGVASTKARIAELEKIIGEVKNINTRKAEVEKKLAVLDALRKGRSGPVRMMDALASATPKKVWVKTFSENNNAVSIDGSAVSHDEVAEFMRGLNGVVWTPKGMGRLVDRRRDSKTARVEMLTSDATIEEFPEAQVSPFF------------KNIDLQTAKQVGGAQVGVPILVEFKITMTSNY--------------------

5eiuA

0.10

0.04

1.36

0.56

CNFpred

--------CARHGKLLLFCQEDSKVICWLCERSQEHR----GHHTFLME------------EVAQEYHVKLQTALEMLRQKQQEAETERNQVAKRVPKAPPEKEALIARGKALGEQTQYMRELISELEHRLQGS----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

4bujB

0.02

1.15

0.67

DEthreader

KYIIAMTLTQ-----PNNLEVLSELS-------------------VIKGIKGDSIFRALNLWRKLPGFSTGDDYTAAKYTAWPFRVIFSVGLGQAYHAGIISLCDVGRLDLYSQGLSNGRSKAAQFMYAKNVLENHINNG-------ERHHYENNEL-N--HGLGNFESI-AKTKIS-----------------------FQELLSIIAKLYGESDEMSDDKREDLS-----LEE----------------TRLYRNDTGKQVWQRAVWLDKNIQRRIASNGA---------LRSIQRG-

3jb9U

0.07

2.79

1.47

MapAlign

----MFCSISGETPKEPVISRVSNVYEKRLIETSKDPVTQQECDLVPVKVPDFVRPATSLPALLSLFQEEWDSVALEQFELRRNLTETKQELSTALYSLDAALRVISRLTKERDEAREALAKFSDPSTILENLETESTTSFFPSPENSSFVLCLHKDELLCLDIQSEGSALACCWLTSSKIAVASIFEFPVSSSGLQSVGEIDEKVNFLQAHPSGEYLLAASNEKCYYNITVAQHITSLAVHPDGNLFVAGLENGELRFFETSSGNELTKFGPHSSPVKTLQWLVVTTNSDIFIWDLRKS

3oc5A

0.10

3.54

0.64

MUSTER

----------EHLRYPYL----------ECIKIGMSRDYLENCVKVSFPTS-QDMFYDAYPSTKTRTKEDFSARLLAGDYDSLQKLYIDFYLAQTTFDWEIPTRDQIETLVNYANEGKLSTALNQEYITGRFLTKENGRYDIVNVGGVPDNTPVKLPAIVSKRGLMGTTSVVNAIPNEIYPHIKVYEGTLSRLKPGGAMIAVLEYDVNSKHGYTNLWDVQFKVPHAETGVIYDPVYEETVKPYQPLTGKKLYNVSTNDMHNGYKWSNTMFSNSNYKTQILLTKGDGSGVKLYSKAYSENF

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.5814

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	4bujB	0.43	5.85	0.036	0.690	model1_4bujB.pdb.gz
2	6um1A	0.42	6.30	0.063	0.703	model1_6um1A.pdb.gz
3	5u1sA	0.41	5.97	0.045	0.657	model1_5u1sA.pdb.gz
4	6g2dC	0.40	6.41	0.038	0.683	model1_6g2dC.pdb.gz
5	7dl2A	0.40	6.05	0.038	0.643	model1_7dl2A.pdb.gz
6	3s4wB	0.39	5.80	0.068	0.627	model1_3s4wB.pdb.gz
7	3rkiA	0.39	5.52	0.042	0.587	model1_3rkiA.pdb.gz
8	1ztmC	0.39	5.40	0.033	0.577	model1_1ztmC.pdb.gz
9	2wpqA	0.25	3.53	0.021	0.303	model1_2wpqA.pdb.gz
10	3iv1A	0.22	2.72	0.027	0.243	model1_3iv1A.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0003824	0.77	catalytic activity
GO:0016740	0.68	transferase activity
GO:0019787	0.64	ubiquitin-like protein transferase activity
GO:0004842	0.53	ubiquitin-protein transferase activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0009987	0.93	cellular process
GO:0008152	0.76	metabolic process
GO:0044237	0.75	cellular metabolic process
GO:0044260	0.74	cellular macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0044238	0.74	primary metabolic process
GO:0065007	0.65	biological regulation
GO:0050789	0.63	regulation of biological process
GO:0050794	0.62	regulation of cellular process
GO:0019538	0.55	protein metabolic process
GO:0044267	0.53	cellular protein metabolic process
GO:0034641	0.53	cellular nitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:0006464	0.52	cellular protein modification process
GO:0006139	0.52	nucleobase-containing compound metabolic process
GO:0090304	0.51	nucleic acid metabolic process
GO:0022402	0.50	cell cycle process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	1.00	intracellular part
GO:0044446	0.92	intracellular organelle part
GO:0043226	0.88	organelle
GO:0043229	0.85	intracellular organelle
GO:0044444	0.81	cytoplasmic part
GO:0043231	0.78	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0044428	0.76	nuclear part
GO:0032991	0.70	macromolecular complex
GO:0043234	0.67	protein complex
GO:0016020	0.65	membrane
GO:0005829	0.51	cytosol
GO:0005634	0.51	nucleus
GO:0005737	0.50	cytoplasm

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	2gv9B	0.309	6.55	0.045	0.540	2.7.7.7	NA
2	0.060	3b8eC	0.261	5.71	0.017	0.393	3.6.3.9	NA
3	0.060	2hc8A	0.122	4.34	0.027	0.167	3.6.3.-	26
4	0.060	1g0dA	0.288	6.27	0.029	0.497	2.3.2.13	NA
5	0.060	3hz3A	0.309	6.66	0.030	0.543	2.4.1.5	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Click to view	Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
	1	0.01	1su4A	0.279	5.86	0.033	0.447	0.45	NA	complex1.pdb.gz	37,38,40
	2	0.01	2w6dB	0.355	5.23	0.028	0.497	0.45	CPL	complex2.pdb.gz	7,8,24

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.