D-I-TASSER A6NMX2-D1

D-I-TASSER results for A6NMX2-D1

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>A6NMX2 (242 residues)
MLAVEVSEAEGGIREWEEEEKEEEAAERTPTGEKSPNSPRTLLSLRGKARTGGPMEVKLE
LHPLQNRWALWFFKNDRSRAWQDNLHLVTKVDTVEDFWALYSHIQLASKLSSGCDYALFK
DGIQPMWEDSRNKRGGRWLVSLAKQQRHIELDRLWLETLLCLIGESFEEHSREVCGAVVN
IRTKGDKIAVWTREAENQAGVLHVGRVYKERLGLSPKTIIGYQAHADTATKSNSLAKNKF
VV

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MLAVEVSEAEGGIREWEEEEKEEEAAERTPTGEKSPNSPRTLLSLRGKARTGGPMEVKLELHPLQNRWALWFFKNDRSRAWQDNLHLVTKVDTVEDFWALYSHIQLASKLSSGCDYALFKDGIQPMWEDSRNKRGGRWLVSLAKQQRHIELDRLWLETLLCLIGESFEEHSREVCGAVVNIRTKGDKIAVWTREAENQAGVLHVGRVYKERLGLSPKTIIGYQAHADTATKSNSLAKNKFVV
Prediction	CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSCCCCCHHHHHHCSSSSSSSCHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHCCCCCSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSCCCCCSSSSSCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCSSSSSSCHHHHHCCCCCCCCSSSC
Confidence	97655667766643444444444555568776667777654556322333467766676678789848999961897212454145778981699999999829987769999627564379756888955588978999975876613899999999999976531556770345999961798399998289868899999999999994999885799986256442158876743649
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MLAVEVSEAEGGIREWEEEEKEEEAAERTPTGEKSPNSPRTLLSLRGKARTGGPMEVKLELHPLQNRWALWFFKNDRSRAWQDNLHLVTKVDTVEDFWALYSHIQLASKLSSGCDYALFKDGIQPMWEDSRNKRGGRWLVSLAKQQRHIELDRLWLETLLCLIGESFEEHSREVCGAVVNIRTKGDKIAVWTREAENQAGVLHVGRVYKERLGLSPKTIIGYQAHADTATKSNSLAKNKFVV
Prediction	75425356576415545667756656664554665665655455465556564446464651405230000004465464035203301305203301300210340550443200000244041316365135001010203365445302400230001001320463242000000002555100000034174561044015202610705763303033154136566444533044
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180                 200                 220                 240

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSCCCCCHHHHHHCSSSSSSSCHHHHHHHHHCCCCHHHCCCCCSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSCCCCCSSSSSCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCCCCSSSSSSCHHHHHCCCCCCCCSSSC
MLAVEVSEAEGGIREWEEEEKEEEAAERTPTGEKSPNSPRTLLSLRGKARTGGPMEVKLELHPLQNRWALWFFKNDRSRAWQDNLHLVTKVDTVEDFWALYSHIQLASKLSSGCDYALFKDGIQPMWEDSRNKRGGRWLVSLAKQQRHIELDRLWLETLLCLIGESFEEHSREVCGAVVNIRTKGDKIAVWTREAENQAGVLHVGRVYKERLGLSPKTIIGYQAHADTATKSNSLAKNKFVV

4axgA

0.46

0.35

10.12

1.17

DEthreader

--------------------------------------------------------H-LYKHPLMNVWTLWYLENDRSKSWEDMQNEITSFDTVEDFWSLYNHIKPPSEIKLGSDYSLFKKNIRPMWEDAANKQGGRWVITLN-KSSKTDLDNLWLDVLLCLIGEAF-DHSDQICGAVINIRGKSNKISIWTADGNNEEAALEIGHKLRDALRLGRNNSLQYQLHKDT--MVKQNVKSIYTL

4axgA

0.48

0.36

10.45

3.64

SPARKS-K

---------------------------------------------------------HLYKHPLMNVWTLWYLENDRSKSWEDMQNEITSFDTVEDFWSLYNHIKPPSEIKLGSDYSLFKKNIRPMWEDAANKQGGRWVITLNK-SSKTDLDNLWLDVLLCLIGEAF-DHSDQICGAVINIRGKSNKISIWTADGNNEEAALEIGHKLRDALRLGRNNSLQYQLHKDTMVKQNV--KSIYTL

2idvA

0.41

0.30

8.75

1.63

MapAlign

------------------------------------------------------------AHPLENAWTFWFDNPSRQVAWGSTIHPIHTFSTVEDFWGLYNNIHNPSKLNVGADFHCFKNKIEPKWEDPISANGGKWTISCGR----GKSDTFWLHTLLAMIGEQF-DFGDEICGAVVSVRQKQERVAIWTKNAANEAAQISIGKQWKEFLDYK--DSIGFIVHEDAK-RSDKGPKNRYTV

2idvA

0.41

0.29

8.64

1.25

CEthreader

------------------------------------------------------------AHPLENAWTFWFDNPSRQVAWGSTIHPIHTFSTVEDFWGLYNNIHNPSKLNVGADFHCFKNKIEPKWEDPISANGGKWTISCGRGK----SDTFWLHTLLAMIGEQF-DFGDEICGAVVSVRQKQERVAIWTKNAANEAAQISIGKQWKEFLDYKDS--IGFIVHEDAKRS-DKGPKNRYTV

2gpqA

0.63

0.56

16.07

2.92

MUSTER

-------------------------MATVEPETTPTPNPPTTEEEKTESNQEVANPEHYIKHPLQNRWALWFFKNDKSKTWQANLRLISKFDTVEDFWALYNHIQLSSNLMPGCDYSLFKDGIEPMWEDEKNKRGGRWLITLNKQQRRSDLDRFWLETLLCLIGESFDDYSDDVCGAVVNVRAKGDKIAIWTTECENREAVTHIGRVYKERLGLPPKIVIGYQSHADTATKSGSTTKNRFVV

2gpqA

0.65

0.58

16.62

3.66

HHsearch

MATVE--------------------------PETTPTPPPTTEEEKTESNQEVANPEHYIKHPLQNRWALWFFKNDKSKTWQANLRLISKFDTVEDFWALYNHIQLSSNLMPGCDYSLFKDGIEPMWEDEKNKRGGRWLITLNKQQRRSDLDRFWLETLLCLIGESFDDYSDDVCGAVVNVRAKGDKIAIWTTECENREAVTHIGRVYKERLGLPPKIVIGYQSHADTATKSGSTTKNRFVV

3m93A

0.49

0.36

10.56

2.83

FFAS-3D

------------------------------------------------------------RHPLQCHWALWYLKADRSKDWEDCLKQVAVFDTVEDFWSLYNHIQAASGLTWGSDYYLFKEGIKPMWEDENNVKGGRWLVVVDKQKRAQLLDHYWLELLMAIIGEQFEDNGEYICGAVVNVRQKGDKVSLWTRDSLKDDVNLRIGQILKAKLEIPDTEPIRYEVHTGSMVKPRIVIPSK---

2gpqA

0.60

0.51

14.57

1.55

EigenThreader

-----------------------------MATVEPETTPTP-----NPPTTEEEKTESEHYIKHPNRWALWFFNDKSKT-WQANLRLISKFDTVEDFWALYNHIQLSSNLMPGCDYSLFKDGIEPMWEDEKNKRGGRWLITLNKQQRRSDLDRFWLETLLCLIGESFDDYSDDVCGAVVNVRAKGDKIAIWTTECENREAVTHIGRVYKERLGLPPKIVIGYQSHADTATKSGSKNRFVV--

1wkwA

0.70

0.55

15.74

2.42

CNFpred

---------------------------------------------------EVANPEHYIKHPLQNRWALWFFKNDKSKTWQANLRLISKFDTVEDFWALYNHIQLSSNLMPGCDYSLFKDGIEPMWEDEKNKRGGRWLITLNKQQRRSDLDRFWLETLLCLIGESFDDYSDDVCGAVVNVRAKGDKIAIWTTECENREAVTHIGRVYKERLGLPPKIVIGYQSHADTATKSGSTTKNRFVV

3m93A

0.51

0.37

10.66

1.17

DEthreader

-----------------------------------------------------------MRHPLQCHWALWYLKADRSKDWEDCLKQVAVFDTVEDFWSLYNHIQAASGLTWGSDYYLFKEGIKPMWEDENNVKGGRWLVVVDKQKRAQLLDHYWLELLMAIIGEQFEDNGEYICGAVVNVRQKGDKVSLWTRDSLKDDVNLRIGQILKAKLEIPDTEPIRYEVH-----T--SMVKPRIVI

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.7993

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	4axgA	0.72	1.37	0.470	0.748	model1_4axgA.pdb.gz
2	3hxgA	0.70	1.58	0.341	0.740	model1_3hxgA.pdb.gz
3	3m93A	0.70	1.51	0.508	0.731	model1_3m93A.pdb.gz
4	2gpqA	0.70	3.41	0.609	0.855	model1_2gpqA.pdb.gz
5	2idvA	0.69	1.21	0.414	0.719	model1_2idvA.pdb.gz
6	2jgbA	0.67	1.42	0.324	0.698	model1_2jgbA.pdb.gz
7	1rf8A	0.62	3.27	0.293	0.764	model1_1rf8A.pdb.gz
8	4b6vA	0.61	3.30	0.218	0.727	model1_4b6vA.pdb.gz
9	1nj1A	0.34	6.13	0.060	0.570	model1_1nj1A.pdb.gz
10	3fg0C	0.30	6.29	0.054	0.537	model1_3fg0C.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:1901363	0.93	heterocyclic compound binding
GO:0097159	0.93	organic cyclic compound binding
GO:0031370	0.93	eukaryotic initiation factor 4G binding
GO:0003676	0.89	nucleic acid binding
GO:0003723	0.88	RNA binding
GO:0070491	0.87	repressing transcription factor binding
GO:0019899	0.85	enzyme binding
GO:0003743	0.82	translation initiation factor activity
GO:0000339	0.55	RNA cap binding
GO:0000340	0.53	RNA 7-methylguanosine cap binding
GO:0044822	0.52	poly(A) RNA binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0009987	0.86	cellular process
GO:0065007	0.83	biological regulation
GO:0050789	0.83	regulation of biological process
GO:0050794	0.82	regulation of cellular process
GO:0080090	0.76	regulation of primary metabolic process
GO:0060255	0.76	regulation of macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0031323	0.76	regulation of cellular metabolic process
GO:0008152	0.75	metabolic process
GO:0006417	0.75	regulation of translation
GO:0044237	0.72	cellular metabolic process
GO:0044699	0.67	single-organism process
GO:0071704	0.61	organic substance metabolic process
GO:0044238	0.60	primary metabolic process
GO:0043170	0.58	macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0044260	0.57	cellular macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0048523	0.56	negative regulation of cellular process
GO:0044767	0.56	single-organism developmental process
GO:0006807	0.55	nitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:0034641	0.54	cellular nitrogen compound metabolic process
GO:0032269	0.54	negative regulation of cellular protein metabolic process
GO:0017148	0.53	negative regulation of translation
GO:0006413	0.53	translational initiation
GO:0048518	0.51	positive regulation of biological process
GO:0044763	0.51	single-organism cellular process
GO:0048522	0.50	positive regulation of cellular process
GO:0006139	0.50	nucleobase-containing compound metabolic process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	1.00	intracellular part
GO:0044444	0.95	cytoplasmic part
GO:0005737	0.85	cytoplasm
GO:0048471	0.80	perinuclear region of cytoplasm

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1qssA	0.467	5.00	0.089	0.698	2.7.7.7	NA
2	0.060	1trkA	0.409	5.68	0.044	0.669	2.2.1.1	70
3	0.060	3ciaA	0.417	5.88	0.064	0.715	3.4.11.-	NA
4	0.060	1ahuA	0.418	4.06	0.033	0.570	1.1.3.38 1.1.3.13	NA
5	0.060	3d2jA	0.420	4.36	0.042	0.574	1.21.3.3	176

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.67	1ejhA	0.701	1.79	0.728	0.744	1.75	III	complex1.pdb.gz	62,63,65,94,98,102,157,160,164,165,168,211
2	0.36	2v8yA	0.714	1.57	0.724	0.748	1.53	MGV	complex2.pdb.gz	81,126,127,128,137,187,191,225,228
3	0.18	3hxgA	0.704	1.58	0.341	0.740	1.08	GTA	complex3.pdb.gz	73,75,113,126,127,128,180,182,187

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.