D-I-TASSER A6NDX4-D1

D-I-TASSER results for A6NDX4-D1

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>A6NDX4 (124 residues)
MYVSISFLLGLSHLVLCCLLTFIVNFYLPPESIDFEFMAHNWSKGRSPSSTLGLSWFKAG
FRFSDGWSMFYSSGLPGVALPGSPPRSHLLPGTQILIRSFQPCESAKHSARLSSLLTTTS
YSVS

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 \| \| \| \| \| \| MYVSISFLLGLSHLVLCCLLTFIVNFYLPPESIDFEFMAHNWSKGRSPSSTLGLSWFKAGFRFSDGWSMFYSSGLPGVALPGSPPRSHLLPGTQILIRSFQPCESAKHSARLSSLLTTTSYSVS
Prediction	CSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHSCCCCCCCSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHCCCSCCCCHHHSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCSSCC
Confidence	9366404642579999999999986215954444232320334699975431235554141204762101114898632699997323689835876504752333457888876520211209
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 \| \| \| \| \| \| MYVSISFLLGLSHLVLCCLLTFIVNFYLPPESIDFEFMAHNWSKGRSPSSTLGLSWFKAGFRFSDGWSMFYSSGLPGVALPGSPPRSHLLPGTQILIRSFQPCESAKHSARLSSLLTTTSYSVS
Prediction	6424021123232020002112303231237514242224315544435331214124321424431321343413111234634453214113111431531653545440432143353638
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHSCCCCCCCSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHCCCSCCCCHHHSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCCCSSCC
MYVSISFLLGLSHLVLCCLLTFIVNFYLPPESIDFEFMAHNWSKGRSPSSTLGLSWFKAGFRFSDGWSMFYSSGLPGVALPGSPPRSHLLPGTQILIRSFQPCESAKHSARLSSLLTTTSYSVS

1oh2Q

0.10

3.61

0.66

CEthreader

SLYGRNFGDIDDSSNSVQNYILTMNHFAGPLQMMVSGLRAKDNDERLAKGDAANTGVHALLGLHNDTALLYGHGLGAEVKGIGSDGALRPGADTWRIASYGTTPLSENWSVAPAMLAQRSKDRY

2b2jA

0.06

2.52

0.70

EigenThreader

FAGGMPLTLIGAALLWFGWFGFNGGSAAINAVVVTNTSAAVAGFVWMIVSGAIAGLAAITPAAGFVIGLVAGIVCYLAMIDESLDAWAIHGIGGLWGSVAVGILANQLLVSQLIAVASTTAYAF

3ecpA

0.11

0.10

3.46

0.28

FFAS-3D

---NLERMVSILSFVAVRLLQLRAETVLTPDECQL-LGYLDKGKRKRKEKAGSLQWAYMAIARLGGF----------MDSKRTGI-----ASWGALWEGWEALQSKLDGFLAAKDLMAQGIKIG

2qv3A3

0.10

0.09

3.31

0.58

SPARKS-K

----------TASTNVAVKNFNINELIVKTEDIQSRINTVRLETGTRSIFSGGVKFKSGEKLVIDPWNYFDARNIKNVEITRKSTPENPWGTSKLMFNNLTLGQNADYSQFSNLTIQGDFINNQ

5oqtA

0.15

0.07

2.46

0.54

CNFpred

--LVLSFILSGLACVFAALCYAEFASTVPVSGSAYTYSYATF---------GELIAWILGWDLILEYGVASSA---------------------------------------------------

5k6lA

0.04

0.03

1.65

0.83

DEthreader

TDGPSNGMLSTF-N-PDVIERMYGFTSMIVEC-L-LGP--GMN-IHRNGRNF-EYFIAALKLHKYGSDGVAGFIAVKGCKA-------------------FMTLNTRLRDEGFKG-NEYNTAML

5t3rD

0.07

0.06

2.39

0.71

MapAlign

--KMNVLNTEQYGRAMWQAYVNTDWFDEITRTGVIQQYNLSVSNGSEKGSSFFSLGYYKNLGVIKDTDFDRFSANSDYKLIDDILTIGQHFTLNRTSEVQAPGGIIETA---------------

5z50A1

0.13

0.12

4.21

0.41

MUSTER

GTLSIATTHTQARYALPNVISGFIKQY--PD-VSLHMHQGTPMQIAEMDGTVDFAIATEALELFGDLIMMPCYRVTKIGF----RRGTFLRGFMCFIEKFAPHELLAKAVQCHNKFDGIELPVY

2pffB

0.26

0.24

7.46

0.61

HHsearch

YLLSIIGVIQVSVRKAITVLFFGVRCYSLPPSILEDSLENNEGV---PSPMLSISNLTQE--QVQDYVNKTNSHLP----AGKQVEISLVNGAKNLVVSGPPVASPFHSHLLVPAINNVSFNIS

6lixA

0.09

3.40

0.51

CEthreader

LTGEKFTREQASRDPDNYFNIRMLSCPAAEMVDGSEVLYLEQAFWRTPQKPFRQRLYMVKPCPKELKCDVEVSSYAIRPLPEEVIGDIGEHLTTIHLNCCDRGKRCLYEGSTSPGGFPNSWNGA

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.5587

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	5zleA	0.49	4.14	0.045	0.798	model1_5zleA.pdb.gz
2	4o6yA	0.49	4.16	0.064	0.798	model1_4o6yA.pdb.gz
3	1rlhA	0.48	3.82	0.053	0.758	model1_1rlhA.pdb.gz
4	6qd6A	0.48	4.12	0.084	0.782	model1_6qd6A.pdb.gz
5	1w27A	0.48	4.39	0.051	0.766	model1_1w27A.pdb.gz
6	4ddpA	0.47	4.54	0.028	0.774	model1_4ddpA.pdb.gz
7	2wxwA	0.47	4.53	0.048	0.831	model1_2wxwA.pdb.gz
8	2arqA	0.46	4.40	0.075	0.806	model1_2arqA.pdb.gz
9	1e03L	0.46	4.32	0.078	0.782	model1_1e03L.pdb.gz
10	2jb7A	0.46	4.29	0.062	0.782	model1_2jb7A.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0000166	0.12	nucleotide binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0055114	0.07	oxidation-reduction process

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0043231	0.75	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0016021	0.75	integral component of membrane
GO:0016020	0.75	membrane
GO:0044446	0.50	intracellular organelle part
GO:0005794	0.50	Golgi apparatus

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	2ri9B	0.446	4.41	0.063	0.758	3.2.1.113	14
2	0.060	1e6yA	0.458	4.10	0.049	0.766	2.8.4.1	NA
3	0.060	1h1lA	0.436	4.47	0.087	0.750	1.18.6.1	NA
4	0.060	1l5hA	0.312	4.75	0.048	0.548	1.18.6.1	NA
5	0.060	3bxvA	0.427	4.31	0.043	0.702	1.13.11.55	22

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.05	1nq9I	0.421	4.87	0.067	0.798	0.32	NTP	complex1.pdb.gz	11,12,14,15,50
2	0.01	3drbB	0.432	4.85	0.045	0.782	0.19	ADP	complex2.pdb.gz	4,8,38
3	0.01	3sqgA	0.456	4.26	0.057	0.790	0.12	TP7	complex3.pdb.gz	11,52,53,94
4	0.01	3sqgA	0.456	4.26	0.057	0.790	0.20	M43	complex4.pdb.gz	10,11,12,13,14,53
5	0.01	1nq9L	0.448	4.52	0.078	0.790	0.23	NTP	complex5.pdb.gz	11,12,14,15
6	0.01	1qh40	0.458	4.39	0.042	0.774	0.13	III	complex6.pdb.gz	10,12,16,19,22,36,37,80,81
7	0.01	3sqgD	0.443	4.45	0.038	0.782	0.33	M43	complex7.pdb.gz	4,69,83
8	0.01	1vrpB	0.347	4.52	0.038	0.589	0.17	ADP	complex8.pdb.gz	3,39,40,59,75,76,77
9	0.01	1gkmA	0.355	4.97	0.029	0.637	0.14	UUU	complex9.pdb.gz	10,14,52
10	0.01	1lq8C	0.433	4.49	0.095	0.750	0.10	III	complex10.pdb.gz	1,52,53,54,57,59,61,79

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.