D-I-TASSER A4D126

D-I-TASSER results for A4D126

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: A4D126
Protein Name: D-ribitol-5-phosphate cytidylyltransferase
Gene Name: CRPPA

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>A4D126 (451 residues)
MEAGPPGSARPAEPGPCLSGQRGADHTASASLQSVAGTEPGRHPQAVAAVLPAGGCGERM
GVPTPKQFCPILERPLISYTLQALERVCWIKDIVVAVTGENMEVMKSIIQKYQHKRISLV
EAGVTRHRSIFNGLKALAEDQINSKLSKPEVVIIHDAVRPFVEEGVLLKVVTAAKEHGAA
GAIRPLVSTVVSPSADGCLDYSLERARHRASEMPQAFLFDVIYEAYQQCSDYDLEFGTEC
LQLALKYCCTKAKLVEGSPDLWKVTYKRDLYAAESIIKERISQEICVVMDTEEDNKHVGH
LLEEVLKSELNHVKVTSEALGHAGRHLQQIILDQCYNFVCVNVTTSDFQETQKLLSMLEE
SSLCILYPVVVVSVHFLDFKLVPPSQKMENLMQIREFAKEVKERNILLYGLLISYPQDDQ
KLQESLRQGAIIIASLIKERNSGLIGQLLIA

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	A4D126-D1	1-22,283-451	191		MEAGPPGSARPAEPGPCLSGQRQEICVVMDTEEDNKHVGHLLEEVLKSELNHVKVTSEALGHAGRHLQQIILDQCYNFVCVNVTTSDFQETQKLLSMLEESSLCILYPVVVVSVHFLDFKLVPPSQKMENLMQIREFAKEVKERNILLYGLLISYPQDDQKLQESLRQGAIIIASLIKERNSGLIGQLLIA
2	A4D126-D2	23-282	260		GADHTASASLQSVAGTEPGRHPQAVAAVLPAGGCGERMGVPTPKQFCPILERPLISYTLQALERVCWIKDIVVAVTGENMEVMKSIIQKYQHKRISLVEAGVTRHRSIFNGLKALAEDQINSKLSKPEVVIIHDAVRPFVEEGVLLKVVTAAKEHGAAGAIRPLVSTVVSPSADGCLDYSLERARHRASEMPQAFLFDVIYEAYQQCSDYDLEFGTECLQLALKYCCTKAKLVEGSPDLWKVTYKRDLYAAESIIKERIS

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.63

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	4cvhA	0.84	1.57	0.990	0.867	model1_4cvhA.pdb.gz
2	3ogzA	0.52	5.48	0.081	0.694	model1_3ogzA.pdb.gz
3	3d8vA	0.52	4.90	0.094	0.639	model1_3d8vA.pdb.gz
4	4bqhA	0.51	4.82	0.085	0.645	model1_4bqhA.pdb.gz
5	7k47A	0.51	5.02	0.083	0.634	model1_7k47A.pdb.gz
6	5vmkA	0.51	5.03	0.090	0.627	model1_5vmkA.pdb.gz
7	1hm8A	0.51	4.61	0.093	0.610	model1_1hm8A.pdb.gz
8	2w0wA	0.50	4.78	0.096	0.616	model1_2w0wA.pdb.gz
9	3fwwA	0.50	4.73	0.081	0.614	model1_3fwwA.pdb.gz
10	2yqjA	0.50	4.48	0.100	0.610	model1_2yqjA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0003824	1.00	catalytic activity
GO:0016740	0.97	transferase activity
GO:0016779	0.96	nucleotidyltransferase activity
GO:0050518	0.93	2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate cytidylyltransferase activity
GO:0097159	0.65	organic cyclic compound binding
GO:1901363	0.64	heterocyclic compound binding
GO:0036094	0.63	small molecule binding
GO:0097367	0.62	carbohydrate derivative binding
GO:0000166	0.62	nucleotide binding
GO:0032553	0.61	ribonucleotide binding
GO:0032549	0.61	ribonucleoside binding
GO:0043167	0.59	ion binding
GO:0046872	0.57	metal ion binding
GO:0046914	0.52	transition metal ion binding
GO:0032557	0.51	pyrimidine ribonucleotide binding
GO:0032551	0.51	pyrimidine ribonucleoside binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0071704	1.00	organic substance metabolic process
GO:0044763	1.00	single-organism cellular process
GO:0044710	1.00	single-organism metabolic process
GO:0044238	1.00	primary metabolic process
GO:0044237	1.00	cellular metabolic process
GO:0044260	0.91	cellular macromolecule metabolic process
GO:0005975	0.90	carbohydrate metabolic process
GO:0006486	0.89	protein glycosylation
GO:0035269	0.88	protein O-linked mannosylation

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0044424	1.00	intracellular part
GO:0044444	0.99	cytoplasmic part
GO:0005829	0.91	cytosol
GO:0043226	0.57	organelle
GO:0043229	0.55	intracellular organelle
GO:0043227	0.55	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0043231	0.53	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.489	1i52A	0.466	2.01	0.238	0.494	2.7.7.60 2.7.7.-	59
2	0.390	2e3dC	0.459	2.85	0.130	0.508	2.7.7.9	59
3	0.361	1lvwA	0.457	3.69	0.144	0.530	2.7.7.24	59
4	0.322	1mc3A	0.454	3.57	0.140	0.521	2.7.7.24	59
5	0.271	3f1cB	0.475	2.34	0.284	0.508	2.7.7.60	126,159,183,265,269

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.62	1vpaA	0.465	1.85	0.305	0.488	1.39	CTP	complex1.pdb.gz	52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,66,123,124,125,126,129,156,157,158,263
2	0.42	1yp3A	0.498	4.38	0.121	0.603	1.04	ATP	complex2.pdb.gz	52,54,96,125,126,129,156,157,158,236,237,238
3	0.40	1h5sC	0.448	3.80	0.134	0.525	0.96	TMP	complex3.pdb.gz	52,53,54,55,67,121,124,125,126,127,158
4	0.12	2ggqA	0.458	4.44	0.136	0.563	0.95	TTP	complex4.pdb.gz	52,54,55,56,57,58,59,66,122,125,129
5	0.09	3d8vA	0.516	4.90	0.094	0.639	0.89	UD1	complex5.pdb.gz	52,54,55,122,124,125,126,129,156,238,265
6	0.08	2v0lA	0.506	4.91	0.092	0.623	0.82	URI	complex6.pdb.gz	52,54,55,125,126,156,158
7	0.07	2w0vA	0.505	4.96	0.087	0.625	0.81	LZR	complex7.pdb.gz	52,55,67,122,129,156,158,183,212,263

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.