D-I-TASSER A2RTY3

D-I-TASSER results for A2RTY3

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Summary of the Protein

Uniprot ID: A2RTY3
Protein Name: Protein HEATR9
Gene Name: HEATR9

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>A2RTY3 (570 residues)
MAYEKSTDISDVSRSMFLYPWLEYPDKTKELRKAMAPVHLPLSCYQMPKEEFPPSPECWR
QHPSKPNSVPYCYFKKPEIYTHWHDLYDQREEREAEKMLRKMRDDCRYIKEVHQTHIKMF
HLPMSKLTIKSEMRSRPLEPTQDPLKWQRLRELTKSLESPREDEQFYAAQALGCLRISDK
FVMEALQQVAQTGPEKVKYEAYRTLAILGCLNKHVIRALIKQLKEKNEGQRMETLTGLRM
ALNSWAAVSKDKRTQVGDEGKLVPVLQTLIKKSSSEASLEAALCLGFLRPCSNMVQEFLL
QCLCQGLKTQRMKALRMLVKVMHVHSAPVIKAILDQLCSSSVLEDRFEATQMLKTIGLEQ
IQAQGLEELTFNLLRRKTHNEPFLAVRQAVAQTVEELKLKPTMMNLVEAQLMNPDATARQ
EAVISLGVLGIRSPQVFHLLLDLLDAENHQAVKKSLQETLILCASIDPWIQNKLKNKVLS
VYEAPKTNVKAEPTRFQKEPENPEELTIQDFRLAKLNPLFIAKSITKVGQKKTPAFPPCC
SKPRKHRPQVIGPWQPRIKKQLRVLAEIAK

Predicted Contact and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure) and distance map (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Information of Domain

No. of Domain	Domain	Domain Boundary	Length of Domain	Models of Domain	Sequence
1	A2RTY3-D1	1-119	119		MAYEKSTDISDVSRSMFLYPWLEYPDKTKELRKAMAPVHLPLSCYQMPKEEFPPSPECWRQHPSKPNSVPYCYFKKPEIYTHWHDLYDQREEREAEKMLRKMRDDCRYIKEVHQTHIKM
2	A2RTY3-D2	120-325	206		FHLPMSKLTIKSEMRSRPLEPTQDPLKWQRLRELTKSLESPREDEQFYAAQALGCLRISDKFVMEALQQVAQTGPEKVKYEAYRTLAILGCLNKHVIRALIKQLKEKNEGQRMETLTGLRMALNSWAAVSKDKRTQVGDEGKLVPVLQTLIKKSSSEASLEAALCLGFLRPCSNMVQEFLLQCLCQGLKTQRMKALRMLVKVMHVH
3	A2RTY3-D3	326-570	245		SAPVIKAILDQLCSSSVLEDRFEATQMLKTIGLEQIQAQGLEELTFNLLRRKTHNEPFLAVRQAVAQTVEELKLKPTMMNLVEAQLMNPDATARQEAVISLGVLGIRSPQVFHLLLDLLDAENHQAVKKSLQETLILCASIDPWIQNKLKNKVLSVYEAPKTNVKAEPTRFQKEPENPEELTIQDFRLAKLNPLFIAKSITKVGQKKTPAFPPCCSKPRKHRPQVIGPWQPRIKKQLRVLAEIAK

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.74

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	6reyc	0.58	6.18	0.059	0.819	model1_6reyc.pdb.gz
2	3w3gA	0.48	5.98	0.070	0.665	model1_3w3gA.pdb.gz
3	6xteA	0.47	5.67	0.075	0.640	model1_6xteA.pdb.gz
4	5dlqB	0.47	5.84	0.070	0.637	model1_5dlqB.pdb.gz
5	6xjpC	0.47	6.03	0.057	0.649	model1_6xjpC.pdb.gz
6	3oc3A	0.47	5.54	0.070	0.628	model1_3oc3A.pdb.gz
7	5gm6G	0.46	6.06	0.052	0.640	model1_5gm6G.pdb.gz
8	3wpbA	0.46	6.28	0.071	0.668	model1_3wpbA.pdb.gz
9	5gmfA	0.46	6.07	0.063	0.651	model1_5gmfA.pdb.gz
10	6yejA	0.46	7.15	0.035	0.705	model1_6yejA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0005215	0.50	transporter activity
GO:0008565	0.49	protein transporter activity
GO:0008139	0.49	nuclear localization sequence binding
GO:0003676	0.36	nucleic acid binding
GO:0003723	0.35	RNA binding
GO:0099600	0.32	transmembrane receptor activity
GO:0070851	0.32	growth factor receptor binding
GO:0038023	0.32	signaling receptor activity
GO:0005126	0.32	cytokine receptor binding

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0009987	0.90	cellular process
GO:0044699	0.89	single-organism process
GO:0044763	0.72	single-organism cellular process
GO:0048869	0.68	cellular developmental process
GO:0030154	0.61	cell differentiation
GO:0002244	0.60	hematopoietic progenitor cell differentiation

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0016021	1.00	integral component of membrane
GO:0016020	1.00	membrane
GO:0044464	0.99	cell part
GO:0044424	0.96	intracellular part
GO:0044444	0.82	cytoplasmic part
GO:0044446	0.77	intracellular organelle part
GO:0005737	0.71	cytoplasm
GO:0044459	0.69	plasma membrane part
GO:0043229	0.69	intracellular organelle
GO:0005886	0.69	plasma membrane
GO:0043227	0.68	membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0043231	0.67	intracellular membrane-bounded organelle
GO:0031226	0.62	intrinsic component of plasma membrane
GO:0031090	0.56	organelle membrane
GO:0005887	0.52	integral component of plasma membrane

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.060	1g87B	0.327	7.02	0.032	0.496	3.2.1.4	NA
2	0.060	2rd0A	0.314	7.96	0.036	0.523	2.7.1.153	NA
3	0.060	2pffA	0.352	8.19	0.023	0.605	2.3.1.41 2.3.1.86	NA
4	0.060	2g8eA	0.174	6.95	0.030	0.267	3.4.22.52	NA
5	0.060	3eqoA	0.314	7.33	0.028	0.493	3.2.1.58	NA

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.01	1f59B	0.328	4.68	0.070	0.402	0.43	III	complex1.pdb.gz	165,170,173,174
2	0.01	2ot8A	0.363	6.94	0.071	0.549	0.50	III	complex2.pdb.gz	134,165,174,196,199,200,203,234
3	0.01	1o6oA	0.328	4.58	0.071	0.400	0.51	III	complex3.pdb.gz	169,172,173
4	0.01	2z5kA	0.353	6.13	0.060	0.496	0.45	III	complex4.pdb.gz	170,174,203,233,236,239
5	0.01	2bptA	0.430	6.33	0.053	0.602	0.46	III	complex5.pdb.gz	169,170,173,174
6	0.01	1ibr1	0.314	3.93	0.052	0.358	0.48	III	complex6.pdb.gz	174,236,276,279,280,283,287
7	0.01	1o6pA	0.326	4.70	0.073	0.400	0.59	III	complex7.pdb.gz	166,169,170

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.