D-I-TASSER A0A1W2PRS3-D1

D-I-TASSER results for A0A1W2PRS3-D1

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>A0A1W2PRS3 (101 residues)
GVHRKPSLLAHPGPLVKSEETVILQCWSDVMFEHFLLHREGTFNDTLRLTGELHDGVSKA
NFSIGRMTQDLAGTYRCYGSVPHSPYQLSAPSDPLDIVITG

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 \| \| \| \| \| GVHRKPSLLAHPGPLVKSEETVILQCWSDVMFEHFLLHREGTFNDTLRLTGELHDGVSKANFSIGRMTQDLAGTYRCYGSVPHSPYQLSAPSDPLDIVITG
Prediction	CCCCCCSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSCCCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSCCCCHHHCSSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSC
Confidence	98899946753788436898489997267887499999789888861113113798438999855678556818999985489976415899965999709
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 \| \| \| \| \| GVHRKPSLLAHPGPLVKSEETVILQCWSDVMFEHFLLHREGTFNDTLRLTGELHDGVSKANFSIGRMTQDLAGTYRCYGSVPHSPYQLSAPSDPLDIVITG
Prediction	86454230213444404454302010325433220101224546334444554573433040304413473323120222345433311442431404148
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Contact, Hydrogen and Distance Map Used in D-I-TASSER simulation

Contact Map

Distance Map

Hydrogen bond networks

D-I-TASSER simulation is guided by the consensus contact map (left figure), distance map (middle figure) and Hydrogen bond network (right figure) derived based on confidence scores of AttentionPotential. In the contact, distance map and hydrogen bond networks, the axes mark the residue index along the sequence. For the contact map, each dot represents a residue pair with predicted contact, while for the distance map and hydrogen bond network, a color scale represents a distance of 1-20+ angstroms or a angle of 0-180 degree.

Top 10 threading templates used by D-I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
hit

ID1

ID2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
alignment

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

SS
Seq

CCCCCCSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSCCCCCCCSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSCCCCHHHCSSSSSSSSCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSC
GVHRKPSLLAHPGPLVKSEETVILQCWSDVMFEHFLLHREGTFNDTLRLTGELHDGVSKANFSIGRMTQDLAGTYRCYGSVPHSPYQLSAPSDPLDIVITG

7khfH

0.42

12.22

1.33

DEthreader

QFYDRVSLSVQPGPTVASGENVTLLCQSQGWMQTFLLTKEGAADDPWRL-RSTYQQKYQAEFPMGPVTSAHAGTYRCYGSQSSKPYLLTHPSDPLELVVSA

1efxD1

0.90

0.88

24.77

1.24

SPARKS-K

-VHRKPSLLAHPGRLVKSEETVILQCWSDVRFEHFLLHREGKFKDTLHLIGEHHDGVSKANFSIGPMMQDLAGTYRCYGSVTHSPYQLSAPSDPLDIVIT-

1b6uA

0.90

0.88

24.77

0.55

MapAlign

--HRKPSLLAHPGPLVKSEETVILQCWSDVRFQHFLLHREGKFKDTLHLIGEHHDGVSKANFSIGPMMQDLAGTYRCYGSVTHSPYQLSAPSDPLDIVITG

1b6uA

0.90

0.88

24.77

0.48

CEthreader

--HRKPSLLAHPGPLVKSEETVILQCWSDVRFQHFLLHREGKFKDTLHLIGEHHDGVSKANFSIGPMMQDLAGTYRCYGSVTHSPYQLSAPSDPLDIVITG

3vh8G3

0.80

0.77

21.82

1.40

MUSTER

GNHRKPSLLAHPGPLVKSGERVILQCWSDIMFEHFFLHKEGISKDPSRLVGQIHDGVSKANFSIGPMMLALAGTYRCYGSVTHTPYQLSAPSDPLDIV---

1efxD

0.90

0.89

25.05

0.41

HHsearch

-VHRKPSLLAHPGRLVKSEETVILQCWSDVRFEHFLLHREGKFKDTLHLIGEHHDGVSKANFSIGPMMQDLAGTYRCYGSVTHSPYQLSAPSDPLDIVITG

1efxD1

0.90

0.88

24.77

1.70

FFAS-3D

-VHRKPSLLAHPGRLVKSEETVILQCWSDVRFEHFLLHREGKFKDTLHLIGEHHDGVSKANFSIGPMMQDLAGTYRCYGSVTHSPYQLSAPSDPLDIVIT-

6aedA2

0.40

11.68

0.32

EigenThreader

QIRGTPFISVQPGPTVASGENVTLLCQSWRQFHTFLLTKAGAADAPLRLRSIHEYPKYQAEFPMSPVTSAHAGTYRCYGSLNSDPYLLSHPSEPLELVVS-

1nkrA

0.93

0.90

25.30

1.85

CNFpred

---RKPSLLAHPGPLVKSEETVILQCWSDVMFEHFLLHREGMFNDTLRLIGEHHDGVSKANFSISRMTQDLAGTYRCYGSVTHSPYQVSAPSDPLDIVIIG

2p1yA2

0.16

0.15

4.95

1.33

DEthreader

-ADGQVRQSPQ-SLTVWEGETAILNCSYENSFDYFPWYQQGPALLIFTIFFNKRE--KKLSLHIADSQPGDSATYFCAAIDTNA-YKVI-FGKGTHLHVLP

(a)	ID1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	ID2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment and is highlighted in bold.
(e)	Download alignment lists the threading program used to identify the template, and provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates (threading[1-10].pdb.gz).
(f)	Template residues identical to query sequence are highlighted in color.

Top 1 final models from D-I-TASSER

Click to view	Rank^a	Download	Estimated TM-score^b
	1	model1.pdb.gz	0.8575

(a)

D-I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, i.e. decoys. These decoys are clustered by SPICKER based on pairwise structure similarity to report up to five final models from the five largest clusters. Models are ranked in descending order of cluster size. If the simulations converge well, it is possible to have less than 5 models generated, which is usually an indication of good model quality.

(b)

The model confidence is quantitatified by estimated TM-score (eTM-score), calculated based on significance of threading template alignments, contact map satisfaction rate, mean absolute error between distance of model and distance of AttentionPotential, and convergence of D-I-TASSER simulations. eTM-score is typically in the range of [0, 1], with higher eTM-score signifies higher model confidence.

Proteins with similar structure

Top 10 structural analogs in PDB (as identified by TM-align)

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	Download Alignment
1	3vh8G	0.95	1.00	0.792	1.000	model1_3vh8G.pdb.gz
2	1b6uA	0.94	1.04	0.899	0.980	model1_1b6uA.pdb.gz
3	6aedA2	0.92	1.15	0.410	0.990	model1_6aedA2.pdb.gz
4	7khfH	0.91	1.32	0.426	1.000	model1_7khfH.pdb.gz
5	6grqA	0.89	1.24	0.414	0.980	model1_6grqA.pdb.gz
6	4ll9A	0.88	1.41	0.433	0.960	model1_4ll9A.pdb.gz
7	1ovzA2	0.86	1.50	0.368	0.941	model1_1ovzA2.pdb.gz
8	5nstB	0.86	1.53	0.268	0.951	model1_5nstB.pdb.gz
9	3kgrA	0.86	1.47	0.271	0.951	model1_3kgrA.pdb.gz
10	1p6fA	0.85	1.24	0.372	0.931	model1_1p6fA.pdb.gz

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Gene Ontology (GO) Terms

Molecular Function (MF)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0004872	0.82	receptor activity
GO:0003823	0.76	antigen binding
GO:0042605	0.70	peptide antigen binding
GO:0004871	0.68	signal transducer activity
GO:0038023	0.65	signaling receptor activity
GO:0004888	0.64	transmembrane signaling receptor activity

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Molecular Function. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Biological Process (BP)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0050896	0.93	response to stimulus
GO:0002376	0.83	immune system process
GO:0065007	0.78	biological regulation
GO:0050789	0.78	regulation of biological process
GO:0006955	0.77	immune response
GO:0006950	0.65	response to stress
GO:0006952	0.63	defense response
GO:0002682	0.54	regulation of immune system process
GO:0050776	0.51	regulation of immune response

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Biological Process. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Cellular Component (CC)

GO term	Cscore^GO	Name
GO:0016020	1.00	membrane
GO:0044464	0.91	cell part
GO:0044425	0.82	membrane part
GO:0044459	0.71	plasma membrane part
GO:0016021	0.71	integral component of membrane
GO:0005886	0.60	plasma membrane
GO:0005887	0.56	integral component of plasma membrane

Download full result of the above consensus prediction.

Click the graph to show a high resolution version.

(a)

Cscore^GO is the confidence score of predicted GO terms. Cscore^GO values range in between [0-1]; where a higher value indicates a better confidence in predicting the function using the template.

(b)

The graph shows the predicted terms within the Gene Ontology hierachy for Cellular Component. Confidently predicted terms are color coded by Cscore^GO:

[0.4,0.5)

[0.5,0.6)

[0.6,0.7)

[0.7,0.8)

[0.8,0.9)

[0.9,1.0]

Predicted Enzyme Commission (EC) Numbers

Top 5 enzyme homologs in PDB

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	EC Number	Predicted Active Site Residues
1	0.204	2dm7A	0.629	2.27	0.146	0.802	2.7.11.1	25,92
2	0.202	2edwA	0.650	2.25	0.133	0.812	2.7.11.1	26
3	0.185	2edrA	0.635	2.34	0.120	0.812	2.7.11.1	26,39,41,72
4	0.169	1zvyA	0.751	1.90	0.110	0.901	3.2.1.17	13
5	0.155	2edtA	0.650	2.22	0.159	0.802	2.7.11.1	72,92

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted active site residues.
(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the Enzyme Commission (EC) number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted Ligand Binding Sites

Template proteins with similar binding site:

Rank	Cscore^LB	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov.	BS-score	Lig. Name	Download Complex	Predicted binding site residues
1	0.14	1efx2	0.917	1.45	0.900	0.990	0.69	III	complex1.pdb.gz	19,42,68,70
2	0.07	1vdg0	0.825	1.74	0.400	0.941	0.68	III	complex2.pdb.gz	23,33,46,47,48,49,50,52,61,62,63,65,80
3	0.05	2g5bD	0.758	2.18	0.116	0.941	0.59	UUU	complex3.pdb.gz	13,71,73,75
4	0.05	1m7iB	0.757	2.06	0.118	0.921	0.54	UUU	complex4.pdb.gz	38,40,76,78,92
5	0.05	1m7dB	0.755	2.09	0.118	0.921	0.45	UUU	complex5.pdb.gz	42,74,75,76
6	0.04	1uz8H	0.740	2.11	0.110	0.901	0.50	UUU	complex6.pdb.gz	22,73,74
7	0.04	1etzH	0.777	2.13	0.095	0.941	0.44	GAS	complex7.pdb.gz	74,76,78,93
8	0.04	3ifpH	0.771	1.98	0.085	0.931	0.50	III	complex8.pdb.gz	37,39,40,43,45,47,96,97
9	0.03	3idiB	0.780	2.01	0.135	0.951	0.40	III	complex9.pdb.gz	41,43,71,74,98
10	0.03	3ixtH	0.775	1.96	0.117	0.931	0.41	III	complex10.pdb.gz	14,64,100

	Click on the radio buttons to visualize predicted binding site and residues.
(a)	Cscore^LB is the confidence score of predicted binding site. Cscore^LB values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable ligand-binding site prediction.
(b)	BS-score is a measure of local similarity (sequence & structure) between template binding site and predicted binding site in the query structure. Based on large scale benchmarking analysis, we have observed that a BS-score >1 reflects a significant local match between the predicted and template binding site.
(c)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(d)	RMSD^a the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(e)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(f)	Cov. represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

[Click result.zip to download all results on this page]

References:
1.	Wei Zheng, Chengxin Zhang, Yang Li, Robin Pearce, Eric W. Bell, Yang Zhang. Folding non-homology proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. In preparation, 2020.